Monday, July 19, 2021

Volvo workers

 Jerry White reports on the Volvo workers here.  And Barry Gray reports on support they received from another union.

Here is the workers' statement:

Volvo workers can contact the Volvo Workers Rank-and-File Committee at or by text to (540) 307–0509.


Where we are, what we’ve gone through, and what’s next in our struggle

July 18, 2021

Brothers and sisters,

Monday, many of us begin to return to work, after the UAW claimed its third tentative agreement with the company passed by just 17 votes last Wednesday. Many aspects of the revote remain highly dubious, given the supposedly narrow margin, the UAW’s explicitly stated desire to see this contract pass and their dishonest conduct throughout the entire process.

However, setting aside the accuracy of the vote, the conclusion of the strike and the return to work does not mean the end of the fight for the rights of all workers at NRV. Rather, it only marks the beginning of the next stage of the struggle. But to successfully navigate this next stage, we must first review and understand the experiences through which we’ve passed.

At the outset, we wish to state that the Volvo Workers Rank-and-File Committee is immensely proud of having fought alongside our thousands of brothers and sisters over these past three months. For weeks, we collectively held firm against one of the biggest corporations in the world and defied the demands that we must sacrifice while its investors get billions. Our stand will serve as a beacon for the many workers struggling against the very same issues.

To our brothers and sisters who did vote yes and thought it was necessary to end the strike: Our bonds of solidarity are no less profound. We understand the very difficult financial situation that many faced, given the meager $275 a week in strike pay the UAW allotted, and that this was not an easy decision to make. A vote for the contract was by no means an endorsement of its terms, let alone of the UAW.

To the many brothers and sisters at Mack, at auto plants and at other workplaces throughout the country, we extend our deepest appreciation for your solidarity. To the workers in other countries who expressed support for our strike, especially the Volvo Cars workers in Belgium, we wish to say that your words and support immensely encouraged, strengthened and inspired the workers of NRV. It has become clear to us how essential the solidarity of the international working class is for the success of any struggle.

Finally, we want to express our gratitude to the World Socialist Web Site, which provided us with so much invaluable advice and information—about Volvo, about the UAW, about the history of other workers struggles. While all the corporate media and the UAW were blacking out the strike nationally, the WSWS worked to break the blackout and bring the strike to the attention of workers everywhere. We also wish to note that the WSWS did not require agreement with their political program as a condition for their unwavering support for our strike.

Now, let us collectively draw the lessons of this experience. What happened?

To begin with the events of this month, a “third” tentative agreement was announced on July 1, a little over two weeks ago, which the UAW falsely claimed included “major gains.”

This contract, which Volvo and the UAW now assert is in effect, significantly increases health care costs for both active workers and retirees, kept raises roughly below 2 percent annually for the top of the pay scale, does not provide across-the-board cost-of-living raises to keep up with inflation, rebrands the tier system into a years-long “wage progression” system, and gives greater leeway for management to penalize and discipline workers. Of course, these are only the concessions revealed in the UAW’s “highlights,” and we must carefully study the full contract to see what else is in store.

Last Friday, on July 9, despite a campaign by both Volvo and the UAW for ratification of the contract, the majority of workers made clear that it was inadequate, rejecting the agreement by 60 percent.

This is roughly the point at which our rebellion changed from being viewed as an irritation for Volvo and the UAW to a real threat and danger. The strike was gaining support among Mack workers as well as workers internationally. The company’s orders, by their own admission, were put at risk, and so Volvo and the UAW worked out a plan to attempt to break the strike quickly and brutally.

First, the UAW announced to us—speaking on behalf of the company—that Volvo was going to impose the agreement despite our rejection, an open act of strikebreaking. The UAW then said it was organizing a “revote” on the same agreement, a completely undemocratic action, which it attempted to cover over with false suggestions that it was legally required.

The UAW then proceeded with a campaign to convince us that we had no choice but to surrender, that the contract would be in effect even if we voted no, and that all we would “gain” is the loss of our signing bonus. Local 2069 President Matt Blondino and Chair of the Election Committee Missy Edwards both lobbied for a yes vote. Additionally, we were told that the UAW’s misnamed “Solidarity House” headquarters was opposed to the strike continuing, and that it would end by the weekend regardless of the outcome of the revote.

Despite this, there remained very significant opposition to the deal, particularly as more workers learned of the support and strike action by Belgian Volvo Cars workers.

On Wednesday night, the UAW delayed announcement of the results by more than three hours, longer than earlier votes, during which it was undoubtedly consulting with UAW headquarters. Then, it announced the deal had miraculously passed by just 17 votes. It told workers within 30 minutes that the pickets were being closed down “as we speak.”

This immediately prompted an outcry by workers, with many alleging a fraud or calling for a recount, which the UAW has completely ignored. But even if we were to concede that the ballot count was accurate, it does not change the fact that not only the revote, but also the entire so-called “contract negotiation” process overseen by the UAW, was completely undemocratic and essentially illegitimate from beginning to end.

First, the UAW extended the previous contract with the company by 30 days, allowing Volvo to stockpile trucks. Given the widespread sentiment for a strike, with a roughly 97 percent strike vote, the UAW felt they would not be able to get a contract through without allowing some limited job action. It called the first strike on April 17, with the aim, however, of preparing the ground for securing passage of their previously worked out agreement with the company.

Two weeks later, they abruptly shut the strike down, ordering us to return to work without showing the first tentative agreement, let alone holding a vote on it. After the “highlights” were released, however, it became clear that the deal completely failed to meet our needs. Despite threats by Ray Curry, who was then UAW secretary-treasurer and head of the Heavy Trucks Department, and has now been appointed UAW president, opposition to the first TA was overwhelming, and it was voted down by a 91 percent margin on May 16.

Within less than a week, on May 20, the UAW then announced it had a new tentative agreement with the company. Curry falsely claimed that it “made even more solid gains toward fair pay, benefits and job security protections,” but the agreement was in fact only cosmetically different from the first contract.

Despite the best efforts of the UAW and the company, the deal was again voted down overwhelmingly on June 6, by almost the same 90 percent margin. Facing this rebellion by workers, the UAW felt that it had no choice but to call another strike on June 7.

The union proceeded to isolate the strike, starving workers on just $275 in strike pay and enforcing a blackout aimed at preventing autoworkers from even knowing it was happening. It did nothing to oppose the company’s aggressive strikebreaking moves, such as cutting off our health care and other insurance and bringing in scabs. As much as it could, the UAW withheld vital information from us, including what it was demanding of or discussing with the company.

Nevertheless, a majority of us rejected its third contract with the company in the first vote on July 9, as we have already reviewed, despite an all-out campaign by the UAW to sell the deal via lies about how good it was and threats of what would happen to us if it was rejected. It was only through a last-ditch and desperate effort on the part of Volvo and the UAW, dramatically escalating the strikebreaking operation and carrying out a mockery of a “democratic process” in Wednesday’s revote, that they were able to barely secure passage of the contract, or so they claim.

What is revealed by these events? We believe that the following conclusions must be drawn:

1. The UAW represents the companies, not the workers, and no amount of pressure will change that. Far from responding to our overwhelming rejection of their deals with Volvo by reversing course and working to achieve our demands, the UAW instead reacted by doubling down on its information blackout and deepening its conspiracy with the company, which culminated in the assistance it provided Volvo in getting the third TA implemented through the revote last week.

2. While the UAW has shown it is not capable of meeting our needs, that does not diminish or remove the necessity of a collective, rank-and-file organization of workers to defend and fight for our interests. The Volvo Workers Rank-and-File Committee fought throughout the struggle to unify all workers, to give voice to the needs of all the generations, to combat the lies of Volvo and the UAW and to find the path to win the strike. Many workers at NRV reached out to us and communicated with our committee during the strike, telling us that the no votes would not have been as substantial as they were if it were not for the statements of our committee.

3. For the next fight to be successful, whether at Volvo, Mack or elsewhere, it must broaden its scope beyond one or another plant, mobilizing the real strength of the working class. We cannot combat multinational corporations like Volvo at just one factory. They operate with a global strategy, and so must we. The support of workers in Belgium, Australia, England and other countries showed that workers internationally are able to recognize they are facing the same issues, and want to unite in a struggle against them.

This work of linking up with other workers has already started, and it must be developed even further. Our committee has begun to coordinate with workers at Mack Trucks in Pennsylvania who have founded their own rank-and-file committee, as well as workers in other states. We make a particular appeal to workers at John Deere, who are facing their own contract struggle under the treacherous UAW in the coming months, to carefully study the lessons of our experiences and to form rank-and-file committees like our own.

Moreover, the betrayal we have faced is in no way unique to autoworkers. Right now, Frito-Lay workers in Kansas are on strike after rejecting a contract supported by the union there. Warrior Met coal miners have been on strike for more than 100 days, isolated by the UMWA. The USW just imposed a concessions contract on steelworkers at ATI after a months-long strike. The unions as they exist today simply do not serve the function for which they were originally created in the 1930s.

A real movement of workers must come from the bottom, not from the bureaucracy. The building of a powerful rank-and-file movement—of the workers, by the workers and for the workers—is the task facing all workers everywhere.

Such a movement is on the order of the day. We live in a society that is massively unequal. While we struggle every day to put food on the table for our families and pay our bills, a small percentage of the population lives in unimaginable extravagance. Their salaries are not only in the hundreds of thousands, but in the millions and tens of millions, all of which comes from the wealth that we collectively create. And amidst a pandemic that has killed millions, their wealth has only increased.

To Volvo workers at NRV, we say: The fight continues. Opposition and anger are inevitably going to reignite as the full reality of this new contract comes to light, and as the company tries to enforce speedup to make up for lost production. We appeal to you to join our committee and help us build it as the organization which will lead the struggles still to come.

I believe the vote was rigged and that, in a fair vote, the results would have been to remain on strike.

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Monday:

 Monday, July 19, 2021.  Protesters turn out in Baghdad, David Ignatius plays dummy for his ventriloquists at the CIA, Mustafa al-Kadhimi and (most of) the press pretend he wants US forces out of Iraq, and much more.

THE ECONOMIC TIMES notes, "The White House announced that US President Joe Biden would be meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhemi this month. The White House announced Friday that Biden would be hosting Kadhemi at the White House on July 26 in an effort to reaffirm the strategic partnership between both countries."  Khalid Al Ansary and Zaid Sabah (BLOOMBERG NEWS) add that Mjustafa plans to discuss US troop withdrawal with the White House."  TASNIM NEWS AGENCY explains, "In an interview with Saudi-owned al-Hadath television news network on Sunday, al-Kadhim said that his upcoming visit to Washington is aimed at regulating Iraq’s relations with the United States and pushing for the withdrawal of foreign combat forces from the Arab country."

That probably sounds good . . . to the very stupid. If Mustafa wants foreign troops out, he can do that without a meet-up  If he wants them out (he doesn't).  He can exercise the exit clause in Iraq's agreement with the US.  But he's refused to do that.  He makes statements -- which he knows wil be popular but he never backs them up.

Even now, he's not backing them up.  But a whorish press pretends that he is.  

Even now, he's not calling for US troops out, despite reports otherwise.  Dilan Sirwan (RUDAW) reports:

Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi claimed that his upcoming visit to Washington will put an end to the presence of US combat troops in Iraq in an interview on Sunday, but stressed the need for continued training, air force, and intelligence support.

“We are visiting Washington to set out our relationship with America. The Iraqi army still needs their forces for training. We need their support to our air force, and we need their intelligence support in the fight against ISIS (Islamic State),” Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi said in an interview with the Saudi owned al-Hadath TV on Sunday. 

“The visit will be to set out this relationship, and to put an end to the presence of combat forces, because the Iraqi army can now fight for itself on behalf of Iraqis and the world against these terrorist groups in Iraq,” Kadhimi added. “There is no need for combat troops.”

Get it yet?

He's not attempting to eject US troops out of Iraq.  It's a lie.  He's trying for a second term as prime minister.  Glenn Greenwald, before you Tweet nonsense again about Mustafa, grasp how empty his damn words truly are.

"Combat troops" -- the ultimate weasel word.  

As for the claim that Iraqi forces still need US forces to help them train?  Seriously?

They've been training Iraqi forces since 2003.

I think I had more respect for the Iraqi government in the fall of 2011 when they began making clear that they didn't want any help training from the US.  Remember the millions spent on the secure training facility in Baghdad?  Built just for this purpose.

And never ever used.

The Iraqi forces refused to show up for training from Americans.

Remember that?

Oh, wait, many probably don't because you had 'news' outlets refusing to report the truth if they thought it might hurt Barack Obama's re-election choices.

The current state of the media?

We didn't get here overnight.  The media shielded Barack.  Which is why most Americans don't know about the training facility or the millions -- of US tax dollars -- spent on it or that Barack ended up just handing the building over to the Iraqi government.  Most never heard about poor Brook Darby, sent by the US State Dept to Congress to try to spin this huge failure.  They don't realize that the Inspector General -- whose office was allowed to elapse for telling truths -- noted in reports and testimony that the Iraqis did not want training from the Americans.  

Lying whore Jill Abramson is now exposed for the serial plagiarist that she is.  And, in related news, her son's rock band dreams were crushed (you're welcome, Jill).  At THE NEW YORK TIMES, she whored over and over.  She repeatedly tailored what appeared in the paper based on whether ir would help Barack Obama or not.  Tim Arango was the reporter covering Iraq.  He learned that Barack was sending US troops back into Iraq.  Jill wouldn't let the story run.  She finally allowed it to appear dead center in a long article on Syria.

Here's what Tim Arango reported:

Iraq and the United States are negotiating an agreement that could result in the return of small units of American soldiers to Iraq on training missions. At the request of the Iraqi government, according to General Caslen, a unit of Army Special Operations soldiers was recently deployed to Iraq to advise on counterterrorism and help with intelligence.        

That should have been a front page, stand-alone report.  Instead, it appeared in the middle of a report on Syria.

And while we're here . . .

I take reporters to account.  If you don't like that, oh well.  But grasp that sometimes my sources are reporters.  Meaning?  After Anthony Shadid died, I got a ton of e-mails about how rude I was.

I was rude?

For saying he needed to keep covering Iraq and not Syria?

You do know that Anthony felt that way himself, right?  You may not know that he asked us to hit the paper on that.  You may not realize that he participate in multiple roundtables for the gina & krista round-robin as my guest.

And I bring that up because of whore Jill Abramson.

Let's all be very clear that she's why he's dead.

He didn't want to report on Syria.  He did not think (a) that it was safe and (b) that Iraq needed to lose focus.  

Jill wanted war.  More war.  And she was willing to risk the lives of others to get it.

She's a lying two-bit whore who has Tony's blood on her hands.  She knows it.  Most of us know it.  It's past time she was called out because she is not a journalist.  

She's a plagiarist.  She's a whore.

Anyone counting on her to deliver the news is as big a fool as those who counted on Gail Collins to deliver opinions worth reading.  

If you're late to the party on Gail, this is the piece of trash who oversaw the op-ed pages when the paper had multiple columnists and only one was a woman.  Confronted on hiring a man to fill in for Maureen Dowd when Dowd was on vacation, Gail insisted that it didn't matter.  Representation, didn't matter.  That's the whore trash who tries to pose as a feminist.  Grasp that.  That's the whore who refused to run any of the submissions on Coretta Scott King.  Coretta, a historical woman, had just passed away.  Gail, herself, did an unsigned editorial on her playwright friend -- a woman whose work is not all that important, sorry -- and had multiple article in the paper -- including on the front page -- about her death.  But Gail wouldn't draft an outside writer to write about Coretta or take any of the submissions on the topic offered to the paper.  Tired of my nagging, Bob Herbert finally pulled Coretta into a column -- the first (and only) time her death was noted on the op-ed pages.  Grasp that we could write a book about all the whore trash at THE NEW YORK TIMES alone. Oh, the stories we could tell.

The bulk of the press exists as p.r. agents.  They don't deliver news, ,they run through publicity copy.  

Saturday, we noted David Ignatius' latest nonsense column which argues -- on behalf of the CIA -- that Mustafa needs a second term because . . . well, there might be worse.

Worse for whom, David?  For whom?

The Iraqi people are suffering.  But he doesn't care about them.  

What's really sad about old whores like David?  They don't realize that they have a long history.  They don't realize that their past arguments re already known.  They don't grasp just how whorish they look.  Papers should probably begin to impose a ten year limit on columnists since, by that point, they ha e a history that betrays them as an idiot who has repeatedly gotten it wrong.

Uli Tweets:

Iraqis have protested in Baghdad to demand that authorities hold accountable the killers of dozens of activists associated with a long-running protest movement. More than 70 activists have been targeted in assassinations, attempted murders and abductions

Deji Sadiq Tweets about it as well:

Iraq protesters demand accountability after killings of activists Hundreds protest in Baghdad demanding the end of impunity after the killings of dozens of pro-democracy activists.

Also noting it is Linda Hemby:

#Iraq: Hundreds protested on Sunday in central Baghdad to demand that authorities hold accountable the killers of dozens of activists associated with a long-running protest movement


In pictures: Iraqis protest in central Baghdad to demand authorities hold accountable the killers of dozens of activists associated with a protest movement against government corruption

Golly, Jane Arraf, that doesn't look like a "small" protest -- the one you noted in your Tweet.  At least you managed to include that the Iraqi police was stopping reporters from taking pictures.

Farid Y. Farid Tweets: 

In #Baghdad, hundreds have taken to the streets today to call for an end to assassinations & abductions targeting activists & revolutionaries of the #October2019 uprising. More than 70 have been killed in the last 2yrs #إنهاء_الإفلات_من_العقاب #Iraq

More poignant scenes from the #Baghdad protest where many youth feel power let down that their friends have been killed without any semblance of justice meted out by authorities #Iraq #إنهاء_الإفلات_من_العقاب

“We're here to say that we want to end impunity in #Iraq,” ., an 18-yr-old student told #AFP from Firdous Square in #Baghdad. “We want freedom! This revolution started because of this & we won't stop until we win”

2:07 PM · Jul 18, 2021

ALJAZEERA carries AFP's report:

Hundreds of Iraqis have protested in central Baghdad to demand that authorities hold accountable the killers of dozens of activists associated with a long-running protest movement.

More than 70 activists have been targeted in assassinations, attempted murders and abductions since a pro-democracy protest movement erupted against government corruption and incompetence in 2019.

“We’re here to say that we want to end impunity in Iraq,” Hussein Al-Faili, an 18-year old student, told AFP news agency on Sunday from Firdos Square, a key protest site.

“We want freedom! This revolution started because of this and we won’t stop until we win.”

Dozens also turned out in the southern city of Nasiriya, where tensions have been running high following a hospital fire that killed at least 60 people on Monday.

The October Revolution started in the fall of 2019 to call out corruption and to demand a better Iraq.  The protests continue.  They continue despite the attacks on protesters at demonstrations -- attacks carried out by security forces.  Remember when, I do, Jane Arraf went on NPR to dismiss the force being shown towards protesters and instead she justified the use of tear gas cannisters and less than 30 minutes after her 'report' social media was abuzz with photos of the protester killed by a tear cannister -- lodged in his head.

Oh, Jane, it's been a very interesting career.  It could make a film.  Not a serious film, mind you, but it would be hilarious if it focused on the oblivious American reporter who forever gets it wrong -- think an update of Bob Hope and Dorothy Lamour's THEY GOT ME COVERED.

The following sites updated: