A large study of the drug hydroxychloroquine has been retracted by three of its authors.
The paper, published in the journal the Lancet last month, concluded that hydroxychloroquine, taken either alone or with an antibiotic, to treat patients with COVID-19 was of no benefit and actually increased a patient's risk of dying.
The publication of the study prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to halt its own study of hydroxychloroquine. The WHO has now resumed the trial.
You may remember that Senator Amy Klobuchar's husband got the coronavirus and that he was treated with hydroxychloroquine, per Amy, and he recovered.
I am not endorsing hydroxychloroquine, I am not saying it's useless. I'm starting with that because the media pushed the one study. Why? In part to make fun of Donald Trump, let's be honest. He keeps harping on hydroxychloroquine and this was a way to run with "Donald is stupid" stories.
That never should have been an issue in the coverage. The media needs to stop trying to frame stories to embarrass Donald. The whole world is not Donald Trump.
This is from Patrick Martin (WSWS):
A report issued Wednesday by the International Council of Nurses (ICN) finds that more than 600 nurses worldwide have died in the coronavirus epidemic, and that an estimated 450,000 health care workers of all kinds have been infected.
The death toll among nurses is more than double the 260 reported on May 6 by the ICN, partly from more countries issuing reports but mainly from the ongoing impact of the pandemic, which has now hit 6.5 million people globally, with more than 380,000 dead.
The Geneva-based nursing association said there was no actual count of the number of health care workers infected because so many countries’ health agencies were not tracking deaths and infections by occupation. The ICN has accumulated statistics from some countries and anecdotal reports from others to produce a low-end figure of 230,000 health care workers infected. The higher estimate of 450,000 is based on the finding that 7 percent of all those contracting COVID-19 are health care workers and then taking 7 percent of the 6.5 million total cases reported.
Disclosure, I'm a nurse. The photo with the article has a person holding a sign that reads "Doctors not martyrs." That grabbed my interest.
It's an important article.
I would like to see a study on workers in the healthcare industry -- one that would include those doing custodial work in clinics and hospitals. I work at a clinic in normal times, during the pandemic, I'm also filling in at a hospital when needed. (Which appears to be all the time lately.) I know we wouldn't be open -- clinic or hospital -- without the workers who keep the place clean. They are, my opinion, more exposed than most others. For example, say I'm taking part in the treatment of someone who has covid 19 but they don't know they have it. They're wearing a mask, I'm wearing a mask. I've got gloves on, etc. Even if I wipe the examining room down after they leave, I'm less exposed than, for example, the woman that wipes down the lobby. To really wipe down the seating area, for example, her pant leg is touching the seat a person sat on. She's also cleaning mass areas -- areas where massive number of people sit, walk, etc. She's also more exposed to the cleaning chemicals.
They, the people doing this cleaning, are the unsung heroes. Without them, we wouldn't be open, without them, it wouldn't be safe for patients to come in.
This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Thursday:
Thursday, June 4, 2020.  Iraq has a host of problems that are not being 
addressed, Joe Biden continues to lack inspiration and is upstaged by 
celebrities, and much more.
“It’s really hard that people are going to tear me apart. But it doesn’t change what happened. This happened in 1993. I was harassed, and I was assaulted, and history will look back on the journalism from this time and judge it,” she tells GT by phone.
Overwhelmed by threats and online harassment, Reade says she is “a poster child for why victims don’t want to come forward.”
“This is destroying my life,” says Reade, who did not speak with GT for our initial story. “I’m not suing Biden. I’m obviously not having any effect on his campaign. His campaign is fine. I tried to come forward in 1993 and in 2019 and now. I just hope it gets easier for the survivors.”
Some former acquaintances of Reade have taken calls from a private investigator and spoken with him. Hummer says the investigator wouldn’t say who his client was, although he insisted it wasn’t the Biden campaign.
 
Starting with Tara Reade who has made a credible allegation that Joe Biden assaulted her.  Jacob Pierce (GOOD TIMES) reports:
“It’s really hard that people are going to tear me apart. But it doesn’t change what happened. This happened in 1993. I was harassed, and I was assaulted, and history will look back on the journalism from this time and judge it,” she tells GT by phone.
Overwhelmed by threats and online harassment, Reade says she is “a poster child for why victims don’t want to come forward.”
“This is destroying my life,” says Reade, who did not speak with GT for our initial story. “I’m not suing Biden. I’m obviously not having any effect on his campaign. His campaign is fine. I tried to come forward in 1993 and in 2019 and now. I just hope it gets easier for the survivors.”
Some former acquaintances of Reade have taken calls from a private investigator and spoken with him. Hummer says the investigator wouldn’t say who his client was, although he insisted it wasn’t the Biden campaign.
It's Anita Dunn, that's the 
client.  Her dirty work is at play just as it was for Harvey Weinstein. 
Times Up will always be a dirty joke for making that dirty whore their 
manager.  It'll be very hard for them to blackmail donations in the 
future, which, let's be honest, is what they've done and they have 
nothing to show for the millions that they've extorted.  They are a fake
 organization pretending to help victims as the money disappears into 
private pockets and is expensed under 'overhead.'  
Tara
 told her story.  She has been attacked for it.  People pretend that the
 slurs and smears means she wasn't assaulted when that's not what they 
mean at all.  
Her character has no bearing on 
whether or not she was assaulted.  What we do have is what in every 
other cases is consider corroborating evidence.  We have her mother's 
phone call to Larry King.  I like Larry and I've known him for years.  
If you missed it, he took time out this week to talk about his friends 
(Joe Biden and Donald Trump) and to say he didn't believe Tara.
You know what I didn't hear, Larry?
I didn't hear you apologize.
For years, you've maintained that you do the work you do for your audiences.
In
 1993, Tara's mother called into your show and asked for help.  Neither 
you nor your guests offered her any.  You just moved right on.
If you don't believe Tara today, well that's on you, now isn't it?
You
 had her mother call in and explain her daughter was having difficulty 
and had just stopped working for a senator.  You didn't have any 
questions, did you, Larry?  That was a viewer you failed.  So don't ever
 tell me again how you do what you do because you're there for your 
audience.  And how dare you, having failed Tara's mother -- one of your 
viewers, how dare you now smear her daughter.
Shame
 on you, Larry.  I've defended you many, many times.  I'm not interested
 in defending you right now and I think you deserve huge push back -- 
which I hope you get.
Not done with the press. 
 I stayed silent on Ryan Grimm for over 24 hours.  I wanted to be in a 
calm place.  He gave an interview to THE WASHINGTON POST -- not linking 
to the garbage, you can Google it if you want.  
I really am not in the mood for these journalists who try to make it about them.
I'm
 not in the mood for these circle the wagons circle jerks.  It happens 
all the time.  Barbara Walters should have been called out for her 
involvement in Iran-Contra but thanks to the circle the wagons aspect of
 journalism, she was barely in a 24 hour news cycle. 
More energy, similarly, was put into defending Ronan Farrow than defending Tara Reade.
Ronan's journalism is questionable.  It is not beyond critique.  
But you saw RISING and various others nearly have a heart attack over the questioning of Ronan's work.
Ryan Grim?  No one forced him to write the article he did -- about Times Up not supporting Tara.  
He
 wrote it.  He was a lousy journalist for not informing Tara of the 
connection Times Up had to the Biden campaign -- she learned of it when 
she read his report.  
Now he wants to back off
 to THE WASHINGTON POST.  Maybe she's telling the truth, maybe she's 
not, he just reported on Times Up and . . .
No.
He
 went on various programs discussing Tara Reade the allegation she made 
and he did so after his report was published, he did so amplifying the 
work of others.
So don't pretend you filed one report and that's all you did.  
And
 if you're not sure of what she's saying, maybe you get off your cushy 
ass and do the damn job you should have done in the first place: report.
I
 don't mean use the names on the list the Biden campaign's handing out 
to the press.  I mean actually report -- don't wait for a listener of 
Katie Halper's show to hear you on it and do the research -- that's who 
uncovered the call made by Tara's mother to Larry King -- that you 
should have done yourself.
If you made stronger
 comments than what THE POST ran, you've got a Twitter account.  You 
didn't note that you were misquoted or that important statements were 
left out.  In fact, while you Tweeted THE NEW YORK TIMES smear job on 
Tara, you didn't even note your interview with THE POST -- nor did you 
call out THE TIMES smear job.  
You aren't 
someone who's a journalist, not a good one, not a bad one, you shouldn't
 even be called a working journalist.  You are a joke and you will 
always be that.
You put a woman out in public 
and now you want to try to save face.  Have the guts to say one way or 
the other whether you believe her.  And stop hiding and pretending that 
all you did was one story in March.  You used her name to get on 
programs and that's another thing.
You stupid 
idiot, learn from your betters. Ellen Goodman walked away from the chat 
and chews because she knew she couldn't be an insta-expert.  She had her
 area of expertise but the chat and chews want you to be an expert on 
every topic.  You clearly are not so stop talking about every topic in 
the news cycle.  Judging by your remarks to THE POST, you're not even an
 expert on what you report on (Tara Reade).  
I
 never respected you and I never liked you.  You are part of the circle 
jerk involving some of the worst men around.  I count three men who have
 assaulted women that you've reTweeted since May 31st.  Did you not know
 -- is that going to be your story like Meryl Streep's lie about not 
knowing about Harvey Weinstein?
Well you need to know.  You present as an investigative journalist so why are you hanging with rapists?
I believe Tara.  If you don't, have the guts to say so.  If you do, do your damn job.
Nothing
 that's been said of Tara discredits her allegation.  It's amazing all 
these 'expert' pieces written and televised and we're the ones who have 
to point out that assault experts are not part of the conversation?  And
 after I hit on that repeatedly with Dean, THE TIMES finally sees fit to
 include them in a report?
Tara told her story 
and the media at large didn't want to deal with it.  That's evidenced 
not only by them ignoring it -- until they were provide the oppo 
research Anita Dunn had overseen for the Biden campaign.  It's also 
evidenced by the fact that the charge is assault.
It's
 not whether Joe Biden paid Tara's bills or not.  Her finances are not 
now and never were the issue.  But that's who the press went to time and
 again, not experts on assault.  We didn't need one sentence in a CNN 
broadcast of MJ Lee speaking as though she's an expert on assault, for 
example, we needed experts on assault discussing the issue, addressing 
the realities.
Her story changed!
Which means nothing.  
Well it means one thing, it means the people screaming that nonsense are stupid and willing to flaunt their stupidity.  
Experts
 on assault would have spoken to how it is not at all uncommon for 
assault to be a slow reveal with the victim revealing more details as 
her/his comfort level rises.
Experts on assault could have addressed so much and educated the public.
But
 they didn't want education, the corporate media's been in the tank for 
Joe Biden all along.  You saw it with their efforts to undermine Bernie 
Sanders.  You saw it with their attacks on Kamala Harris, Cory Booker 
and Julian Castro when they dared to question Joe in debates.  
Smears
 were attached to the story, smears that let rape culture thrive.  The 
media needs to take accountability for what they have done.  They 
won't.  Ryan Grim's only one example of someone who will not take 
accountability.  
And if he no longer knows -- 
or feels he does -- what happened maybe it's time for him to realize 
that he doesn't need to be on RISING every week or all the other 
programs, he needs to be doing the job of journalism.  If he wants to be
 gas bag pundit, have at it but stop pretending you're a reporter 
because you aren't.  And, again, heed the wisdom of Ellen Goodman and 
grasp that you can't be an expert on every issue under the sun just 
because you happened to reTweet on a few topics you've never reported 
on.
At THE GUARDIAN, Lauren Gambino asks, "Can Joe Biden convince protesters he would be a 'transformational' president?" 
 That's why another brainless and braless celebrity was out front 
yesterday trying to build excitement for Joe (and trying to stop people 
from protesting).  I'm referring, of course, to Miss Barack Obama.  
You
 know what, at least Hillary Clinton has the good sense to dial her own 
presence down right now.  She's not trying to steal focus from the 
nominee.  She realizes Joe needs to be the headline.  But Barack, who 
did nothing to stop police violence in his eight years as president and 
whose best known effort at racial healing was the laughable beer summit,
 needs some attention so Miss Barack Obama holds a virtual town hall and
 the corporate media goes into overdrive.
Is Barack the nominee?  
No.  
Joe can't excite voters and he can't connect with them.
Which
 is why the media continues to play the who-will-he-pick game to gin up 
excitement and interest in a flaccid campaign.  Joe has stated it will 
be August when he announces his running mate.  But both he and his 
campaign are so boring and uninspiring that the media daily rushes to 
the closet to pull down their board game and play Mystery Date.
Gretch
 The Wretch has a husband who looks corrupt with his lunacy around 
Memorial Day (the whole yacht thing) and that's not going to play well. 
 Amy's got major racial issues that aren't going to play well.  Stacey 
Abrams isn't experienced or competent enough to serve as vice president 
to a healthy person let alone to Joe who would require a v.p. who could 
step in at any moment due to his poor health and cognitive decline.  
 The media's not addressing those realities, it's just playing Mystery 
Date and that game has not aged well.
By the way, Joe's promise to make a woman his v.p. pick was stupid from the beginning.
There's nothing wrong with picking a woman.
But promising to pick one?
That's nonsense.  
It's one thing to pick a woman because she brings something to the ticket that other candidates do not.  
It's wrong, however, to pick a woman just because you said you were going to.
There's a desperation to it right now as a result.  
And,
 at the end of the day, the pick will not be seen as the best but 
instead as the best Biden could settle for after making his public 
promise.
In other news, Emily Jacobs (NY POST) reports:
Charlamagne tha God isn’t joining Team Biden just yet.
The radio personality, speaking to CNN on Tuesday evening, discussed his assessment of how the presumptive Democratic nominee was performing as the country reels over the death of George Floyd and the protests and riots that ensued as a result.
Despite offering praise for former Vice President Joe Biden’s address to the nation from Philadelphia, the host of “The Breakfast Club” radio program said he needed more from the 2020 hopeful.
[. . .]
The radio personality, speaking to CNN on Tuesday evening, discussed his assessment of how the presumptive Democratic nominee was performing as the country reels over the death of George Floyd and the protests and riots that ensued as a result.
Despite offering praise for former Vice President Joe Biden’s address to the nation from Philadelphia, the host of “The Breakfast Club” radio program said he needed more from the 2020 hopeful.
[. . .]
The African American influencer, who boasts over 2.1 million Twitter 
followers and has interviewed almost every major presidential candidate 
this election cycle, went on to say that Biden had a “racist” 
legislative history in the Senate.
“To me it’s like this: If Barack Obama was JFK, then Joe Biden needs to be Lyndon B. Johnson. You know, he has the opportunity to be as progressive as Lyndon B. Johnson. Lyndon B. Johnson may have been labeled a racist but his record doesn’t reflect that. LBJ’s record showed that he had, like, the most effective progressive record on race and class of any Democratic president of the past 80 years.
“I think, you know, Biden’s record in the Senate actually reflects very racist legislation, but he has a chance to correct that by doing right by black people,” Charlamagne said.
“To me it’s like this: If Barack Obama was JFK, then Joe Biden needs to be Lyndon B. Johnson. You know, he has the opportunity to be as progressive as Lyndon B. Johnson. Lyndon B. Johnson may have been labeled a racist but his record doesn’t reflect that. LBJ’s record showed that he had, like, the most effective progressive record on race and class of any Democratic president of the past 80 years.
“I think, you know, Biden’s record in the Senate actually reflects very racist legislation, but he has a chance to correct that by doing right by black people,” Charlamagne said.
Turning to Iraq . . .
That
 was April, and Mustafa al-Kadhim wasn't yet prime minister -- he would 
become prime minister on May 7th.  It needs to be noted that as he 
prattled on about Iraq's sovereignty and the need to protect it, the 
Turkish government was bombing Iraq and killing people.  That's 
terrorism.  Does Mustafa plan to address that?  Does he plan to ask the 
international community for help with that?  Will he ask the United 
Nations -- which just extended its own mandate in Iraq -- for help in 
stopping the Turkish bombings?
 In other problems that need to be resolved, Karwan Faidhi Dri (RUDAW) reports:
The Iraqi government must submit its 2020 draft budget to the Iraqi 
parliament by June 30, parliamentarians decided during the legislative 
body’s Wednesday session.
Already six months into 2020, Baghdad is currently still operating its financial affairs based on the country’s 2019 budget law, after the government was paralyzed in political deadlock for most of the year.
Until Mustafa Kadhimi was approved as prime minister alongside his cabinet in early May, Iraq had not had a fully-functioning government since December, when Adil Abdul-Mahdi resigned from the post in the face of mass protests over unemployment, corruption, and the lack of basic services.
Both the previous caretaker and newly-established governments have failed to submit the 2020 draft budget to parliament to be turned into a bill and finally a law. This comes at a time of great financial distress for Iraq, which is simultaneously battling an economic slowdown related to the COVID-19 pandemic, a massive drop in oil prices, an increase in Islamic State (ISIS) attack, as well as budgetary disagreements between Erbil and Baghdad.
Iraq’s parliament held a session on Wednesday in the presence of 184 MPs to review a drafted loans bill, and discuss financial support for impoverished Iraqis, according to a statement from the parliament.
Already six months into 2020, Baghdad is currently still operating its financial affairs based on the country’s 2019 budget law, after the government was paralyzed in political deadlock for most of the year.
Until Mustafa Kadhimi was approved as prime minister alongside his cabinet in early May, Iraq had not had a fully-functioning government since December, when Adil Abdul-Mahdi resigned from the post in the face of mass protests over unemployment, corruption, and the lack of basic services.
Both the previous caretaker and newly-established governments have failed to submit the 2020 draft budget to parliament to be turned into a bill and finally a law. This comes at a time of great financial distress for Iraq, which is simultaneously battling an economic slowdown related to the COVID-19 pandemic, a massive drop in oil prices, an increase in Islamic State (ISIS) attack, as well as budgetary disagreements between Erbil and Baghdad.
Iraq’s parliament held a session on Wednesday in the presence of 184 MPs to review a drafted loans bill, and discuss financial support for impoverished Iraqis, according to a statement from the parliament.
The following sites updated:
 
