With all that's going on right now, people demanding justice and equality, that song has been on my mind.
The struggle never ends, sadly. But, hopefully, we get closer and closer to equality and justice with each generation.
This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Monday:
Monday, June 1, 2020. THE NEW YORK TIMES rushes to trash Tara Reade
again, many people aren't having it, in Iraq the water issues continue
in Basra and much more.
Human Rights Watch interviewed 58 Basra residents, workers at private and public water facilities, and healthcare professionals, and reviewed water sample tests from the Shatt al-Arab river, treatment plants, and taps in homes. Human Rights Watch also interviewed representatives from Basra’s provincial council, governor’s office, and the Ministries of Water Resources, Municipalities and Public Works’ water and sewage departments, Health and Environment, and Agriculture, and analyzed academic and public health data and over 20 years of scientific and commercial satellite imagery of the region to substantiate many of the findings.
Basra’s primary water sources are the Shatt al-Arab river and its freshwater canals. Human Rights Watch found that Iraqi authorities have failed to properly manage and regulate Iraq’s water resources, depriving people in southern Iraq’s Basra governorate – four million people – of their right to safe drinking water for decades, including during the period of occupation by the US- and UK-led Coalition Provisional Authority. But multiple government failures since the 1980s, including poor management of upstream water sources, inadequate regulation of pollution and sewage, and chronic neglect and mismanagement of water infrastructure, have caused the quality of these waterways to deteriorate.
THE NEW YORK TIMES drags Tara Reade through the mud again. You can read it at THE WALLA WALLA UNION BULLETIN.
That way, you're not giving clicks to THE TIMES or it's putrid Jim
Root-Toot-en-berg, Stephanie Saul and Lisa Lerer. The bulk of the long,
long article is trash. Here are the parts that matter. First:
Only two people know what did or did not
happen between Reade and Biden in the spring of 1993. Still, like other
significant chapters of the #MeToo moment, Reade’s comes with the
statements of confidants who say they heard her account long before it
became public.
But while five
people have said Reade shared all or part of her account of sexual
harassment with them around the time she says it happened, corroboration
of the assault charge is shakier.
The
two people who say she told them of it contemporaneously — her brother
and a longtime friend — initially offered accounts of harassment, not
assault. The friend told The Times in 2019 that Biden’s behavior was “a
little bit just over the line, but nothing like, ‘Oh, my God, call
911.’”
The friend says she had
withheld the full story because Reade was not ready to share it, and two
other people have said she told them of an assault a few years later.
Professionals who counsel sexual abuse victims say it is not uncommon
for them to reveal what happened piecemeal, over time.
Nothing
Michael Tracey and other pig boys have written or Tweeted about Tara
changes or disproves the allegation of assault she has made against Joe
Biden.
There's this:
There is some contemporaneous evidence that she complained of mistreatment while in Biden’s office.
As
The Intercept reported in April, a woman living in California called in
to “Larry King Live” in August 1993 to say her daughter had been
working “for a prominent senator and could not get through with her
problems at all.” She did not say what that trouble was. Reade has
previously said her mother, who has since died, called into the program
after she told her about her experience.
Three
years later, in divorce proceedings, her husband, Ted Dronen, said
Reade had “related a problem she was having at work regarding sexual
harassment in U.S. Senator Joe Biden’s office.” He did not say Biden had
himself harassed her.
And this:
"By coming forward about Joe Biden,” she wrote Friday, “I have lost
everything again, my job, my housing and my reputation. I have been
called every vile name imaginable and presented as a monster by the
media for daring to speak about Joe Biden and what happened. But I am
free.”
That is all that matters.
Oh, my goodness, some people didn't get repaid when they helped her with an electric payment!!!!!
Who the hell cares?
That has nothing to do with the assault she alleges.
I
loan money all the time and I never do it with the expectation that I'm
going to be paid back. I'm not seeing any story -- and it wouldn't
matter if I did -- where someone's saying, "I had an overdraft on my
account and I told Tara I could loan her X but I needed the money by
noon the next day or I would bounce checks." You had the money, you
gifted the money. In a perfect world, you'd get it back. In the real
world, you know someone supporting herself and her daughter that is
already struggling with bills is probably never going to pay you back.
None of it has anything to do with the charge of assault.
And
no where in the article does THE TIMES take accountability for their
smearing of Tara or for being in the tank for Joe Biden.
He
claimed in an interview two weeks ago that he has been endorsed by the
NAACP every time he's run for office. The NAACP has never endorsed
him. They even issued a statement noting that fact. We covered it at
THIRD ("Does Joe Biden ever stop lying?").
Where's THE NEW YORK TIMES' article? Where's their report noting all
the lies he's told and all the character flaws he has -- including
refusing to acknowledge a grandchild even after DNA tests made clear the
child's father was Hunter Biden?
Joe Biden
dropped out of the 1988 race for president why? Because he got caught
lying. And he clearly didn't learn from it because he continues to lie
-- over and over.
Why is he getting a pass on that from the press?
Oh,
right. Bully Boy Bush had the media's help selling the Iraq War
because the corporate media wanted certain things. Joe's already met
with Comcast and others and promised them their shopping lists would be
checked off.
Left-wing corporate Democratic media and politicians
not only proved me wrong, they betrayed my trust and respect as a
student journalist and moral citizen. Regardless of whether you believe
Tara Reade’s allegation against Joe Biden or not, no human and survivor
who speaks up deserves death threats and harassment, interrogation, trauma-ignorant journalists, disrespect, vilified characterization, and media blackout.
Tara
Reade is certainly not the first survivor to withstand such treatment
nor will she be the last, but as readers and as voters, we need to start
holding our institutions and representatives accountable for the
messages of silence they send.
The New York
Timeswas one of many left-leaning newspapers to exemplify this treatment
against Reade. This was shown by their taking 19 days to report on her allegation, and by including interviews from extraneous staff members, using Trump as a strawman, and editing the article after publication to say "The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden'' and excluding "beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable" —
without notifying readers of the update. Between all of it, this
article and many others like it, politically trivalize sexual violence
in a way that encourages silence for the sake of political convenience.
Many #MeToo leaders and liberal feminists, including Alyssa Milano, fell into this trap of political hypocrisy as well. The double standard reactions
towards Reade's case as compared to Ford and other survivors was made
clear as many went out of their way to criticize Reade, once more
begging the question of trading in any actual conversation of Reade and
her story for political convenience.
[. . .]
As we see survivors on national television
scrutinized and politically targeted by journalists, politicians, #MeToo
leaders, and anyone with an opinion, there's a dangerous message that
the burden is on the survivor and that the world is against them.
Consider another reason many don't report: the length and difficulty of
the reporting process and any following criminal case.
"I've
spoken to a lot of people about this and that was why the case being so
long felt even longer because they have to go through the trauma over
and over again," Sexual Assault and Relationship Violence Activists (SARVA) Director Nicole Sullivan said.
Last week, Regina Munch (COMMONWEAL) noted:
[. . .] a proper DNC inquiry is just what’s needed to give Reade’s allegation
the full attention it deserves. Why be so afraid to carry one out? If
the evidence is compelling enough on either side, then voters will know
whether or not they have a candidate they can be confident in. As
Representative Ayanna Pressley recently said: “I reject the false choice
that my party and our nominee can’t address the allegations at hand and
defeat the occupant of the White House.”
This
is not going away. Even after the 2020 election is over, this is not
going away. The Michael Traceys can savage Tara as much as they want.
It's not going to silence her or the people who are outraged over the
trashing of a woman for stepping forward. This is not a minor issue.
This is one of those issues that will never go away.
The attacks on Tara have been outrageous. What's passed for 'reporting' has been outrageous.
She's
been held to a higher standard than an elected official has. Joe's
entire life has been as a public servant. But he's not held to any real
standard by the media. A woman came forward and was savaged for her
resume, for her rent payments, etc. Joe has repeatedly lied to the
American people. He's easily told a thousand lies in public in
interviews and appearances in the last 12 months.
Where's the lengthy article examining his character?
The corporate media has never held Joe Biden accountable for anything -- including his part in the destruction of Iraq. Miguel Gonzalez (EL PAIS) reports:
At the end of July, Spanish troops will be withdrawn from the Gran Capitán base in Bismayah,
which is Spain’s most important base in Iraq. Before the coronavirus
pandemic, 350 out of Spain’s 530 soldiers in Iraq were stationed at the
Gran Capitán base. The base is one of the Building Partner Capacity
(BPC) centers run by the US-led international coalition in Iraq, which
is tasked with training Iraqi security forces. According to military
sources, troops are being withdrawn because the base has completed this
mission.
The Spanish Defense Ministry is also preparing to withdraw soldiers from Afghanistan by the end of this year or the beginning of 2021, before the 14-month deadline for complete withdrawal of US and allied forces comes to an end, as set out in the deal struck between the United States and the Taliban.
The Spanish Defense Ministry is also preparing to withdraw soldiers from Afghanistan by the end of this year or the beginning of 2021, before the 14-month deadline for complete withdrawal of US and allied forces comes to an end, as set out in the deal struck between the United States and the Taliban.
At ANTIWAR.COM, Margaret Griffis offers her roundup of May's violence: "At least 262 people were killed, and 149 were wounded
across Iraq during May. During April, at least 208 people were killed, and 185
were wounded. Although the new coronavirus kept many civilians in their homes,
security operations against the Islamic State increased violence between those
two groups."
The Iraq War has not ended. And the government of Turkey continues to terrorize the Iraqi people.
For years now, they have been ignoring Iraq's sovereignty and bombing
the country of Iraq. These bombings have resulted in many dead. Seth J. Frantzman (JERUSALEM POST) reports:
Turkish airstrikes killed civilians on Saturday, days after another set
of airstrikes killed members of a far-left Iranian dissident group in
the mountains of the Kurdistan region of northern Iraq.
The attacks appear to represent an increase in Ankara’s use of drones
and airstrikes against Kurdish groups. Ankara claims these groups,
linked to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) are “terrorists” but
presents no evidence that any of them are involved in “terror.”
The PKK is one of many Kurdish groups which supports and fights for a Kurdish homeland. Aaron Hess (International Socialist Review) described them in 2008,
"The PKK emerged in 1984 as a major force in response to Turkey's
oppression of its Kurdish population. Since the late 1970s, Turkey has
waged a relentless war of attrition that has killed tens of thousands
of Kurds and driven millions from their homes. The Kurds are the
world's largest stateless population -- whose main population
concentration straddles Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria -- and have been
the victims of imperialist wars and manipulation since the colonial
period. While Turkey has granted limited rights to the Kurds in recent
years in order to accommodate the European Union, which it seeks to
join, even these are now at risk." The Kurdistan Regional Government in
Iraq has been a concern to Turkey because they fear that if it ever
moves from semi-autonomous to fully independent -- such as if Iraq was
to break up into three regions -- then that would encourage the Kurdish
population in Turkey. For that reason, Turkey is overly interested in
all things Iraq. So much so that they signed an agreement with the US
government in 2007 to share intelligence which the Turkish military has
been using when launching bomb raids. However, this has not prevented
the loss of civilian life in northern Iraq. Aaron Hess noted, "The
Turkish establishment sees growing Kurdish power in Iraq as one step
down the road to a mass separatist movement of Kurds within Turkey
itself, fighting to unify a greater Kurdistan. In late October 2007,
Turkey's daily newspaper Hurriyet accused the prime minister of the
KRG, Massoud Barzani, of turning the 'Kurdish dream' into a 'Turkish
nightmare'."
Frantzman notes, "Iraq has complained to Ankara about the airstrikes but Ankara acts with
impunity and international organizations that usually monitor human
rights refuse to critique Turkey or visit the areas of the drone
strikes."
The new prime minister, like the
previous ones, can't protect Iraq from the continued Turkish attacks.
What can he do? Corruption now threatens to topple Iraq's long standing
food rations program. ASHARQ AL-AWSAT reports:
Iraq has only 190,000 tons of rice available in its coffers for its
food rationing program, the trade ministry said in a statement late on
Saturday.
The country needs around 1-1.25 million tons of rice a year to support the program.
In March, the trade ministry pleaded for money from the state's
budget to build three months' supply of strategic wheat and rice
stockpiles as Iraq grappled with the spread of the new coronavirus.
The
corruption has long been noted. A decade ago, some pretended to be
interested in it and in eliminating it -- the US Congress, for example,
and the US State Dept to name but two. These days? No one really seems
to care except for the Iraqi protesters. A few days ago, Khaled Yacoub Oweis (THE NATIONAL) reported:
A veteran Iraqi economist who is advising the country's new Prime
Minister, Mustafa Al Kadhimi, has revealed astounding figures on
government waste in the resource-rich but impoverished nation.
Mudher Salih told of a state obsessed with generating money from its oil sector without acting to develop the country or plug holes in the budget that have been sucking liquidity out of public finances for years.
The electricity sector costs the government about $10 billion (Dh36.73bn) a year to run but generates only 7 per cent of its operating costs in revenue, Mr Salih told the official Iraqi news agency on Tuesday.
Iraq also suffers crippling power cuts and imports electricity and gas from Iran to boost production.
Official datas show its generation capacity at 16,000 megawatts, compared with the 24,000 to 30,000 megawatts needed to satisfy demand.
Mr Salih, a former central bank official, is one of the few senior
independent experts in Iraq who survived purges under Saddam Hussein.
He retained a senior position in the state after the consolidation of the Shiite political ascendency in 2005, the year Iraq had its first democratic poll post-Saddam.
Mr Salih said Iraq imported $50bn worth of fuel in the past 10 years, although it is one of the top five members of Opec.
"This amount could have been used to build 10 large oil refineries," he said.
Mudher Salih told of a state obsessed with generating money from its oil sector without acting to develop the country or plug holes in the budget that have been sucking liquidity out of public finances for years.
The electricity sector costs the government about $10 billion (Dh36.73bn) a year to run but generates only 7 per cent of its operating costs in revenue, Mr Salih told the official Iraqi news agency on Tuesday.
Iraq also suffers crippling power cuts and imports electricity and gas from Iran to boost production.
Official datas show its generation capacity at 16,000 megawatts, compared with the 24,000 to 30,000 megawatts needed to satisfy demand.
He retained a senior position in the state after the consolidation of the Shiite political ascendency in 2005, the year Iraq had its first democratic poll post-Saddam.
Mr Salih said Iraq imported $50bn worth of fuel in the past 10 years, although it is one of the top five members of Opec.
"This amount could have been used to build 10 large oil refineries," he said.
The rice shortage comes as other things take place. Ayad Allawi Tweeted Saturday about the burning of farms that is taking place in Iraq.
Fuel
and electricity issues are not the only ones corruption has caused.
There remains the issue of Iraq having a lack of potable water. This
should have been seriously addressed in 2003. Instead, 'addressing' it
was handing out tablets to purify water and blaming women -- the United
Nations blaming women, let's be clear. That allowed the corrupt
government of Iraq to continue to ignore the water issue. Basra's water
was so outrageous that it's part of what fueled the protests. ALSUMARIA reports
that the Water Ministry declared today that it 'plans' to address the
issue of the lack of drinking water in Basra. Corruption would also
include the report
that, as vice president, Nouri al-Maliki to four billion dinars
(3,349,396 in US dollars) from the government to decorate his home.
Last July, as people in Basra were suffering, Human Rights Watch noted:
The situation culminated in an acute water crisis that sent at least
118,000 people to hospital in 2018 and led to violent protests.
The 128-page report, “Basra is Thirsty: Iraq’s Failure to Manage the Water Crisis,”
found that the crisis is a result of complex factors that if left
unaddressed will most likely result in future water-borne disease
outbreaks and continued economic hardship. The authorities at the local
and federal level have done little to address the underlying conditions
causing the situation.
“Shortsighted politicians are citing increased rainfall as the reason
they do not need to urgently deal with Basra’s persistent crisis,” said
Lama Fakih,
acting Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “But Basra will
continue to face acute water shortages and pollution crises in the
coming years, with serious consequences, if the government doesn’t
invest now in targeted, long-term, and badly needed improvements.”Human Rights Watch interviewed 58 Basra residents, workers at private and public water facilities, and healthcare professionals, and reviewed water sample tests from the Shatt al-Arab river, treatment plants, and taps in homes. Human Rights Watch also interviewed representatives from Basra’s provincial council, governor’s office, and the Ministries of Water Resources, Municipalities and Public Works’ water and sewage departments, Health and Environment, and Agriculture, and analyzed academic and public health data and over 20 years of scientific and commercial satellite imagery of the region to substantiate many of the findings.
Basra’s primary water sources are the Shatt al-Arab river and its freshwater canals. Human Rights Watch found that Iraqi authorities have failed to properly manage and regulate Iraq’s water resources, depriving people in southern Iraq’s Basra governorate – four million people – of their right to safe drinking water for decades, including during the period of occupation by the US- and UK-led Coalition Provisional Authority. But multiple government failures since the 1980s, including poor management of upstream water sources, inadequate regulation of pollution and sewage, and chronic neglect and mismanagement of water infrastructure, have caused the quality of these waterways to deteriorate.
To cope with water pollution and shortages, Basra residents have had
to rely on purchasing water. The high cost, especially during the
crisis, falls hardest on poorer residents, and makes them particularly
vulnerable to exposure to unsafe tap water.
Some will argue that Mustafa al-Kadhim only became Iraq's latest prime minister on May 7th, give him time. Really? Back to Ayad Allawi who Tweeted May 26th:
No public tribunal has yet been formed to try protestors’ killers; and neither have martyrs’ families, those wounded and made handicapped been compensated. In addition, there must be a fixed date for fair and early elections; a new electoral law; and an independent commission.
This
is not supposed to be a four year term as prime minister. al-Kahim is
supposed to be sorting things out and planning new elections. We're not
seeing that happen. We're not even seeing him offer a full Cabinet
yet.
Kat's "Kat's Korner: Ricky Martin re-emerges" went up Saturday. New content at THIRD:
