I will not link to that garbage.
In a section entitled "Of Wikiblosesphere And Lying Feminist Slags," they trash various women writers and praise professional liar John Pilger. Ava and C.I. addressed his crazy in "TV: The Craziest Sitcom." They catch him lying and explain how he had so refer to that.
John Pilger, Media Lens wants you to know, is whining about women who have played "the feminist card." As Ava and C.I. note, John's had a career that's lasted five decades and coincides with the women's movement and yet he's never written about women. And C.I. can hit a lot harder than that if she has to by citing various female Australian journalists. Johnny Boy's got a bad repuation.
He's nothing but a dirty little liar. And I used to look the other way on his lying ass because we were on the same side. I'd catch him in a lie and write it off as a mistake. It wasn't. It was a lie. And he did it over and over. It took the dirt bag attacking two women who may have been raped by Julian Assange for me to see the truth about that lying piece of s**t. And, by the way, Pilger better hope that C.I. and others don't come forward with some ugly realities about John Pilger. Meaning? This week Sy Hersh unloaded a lot of crazy and got called out for it. Over three years ago, C.I. told you about Hersh's conspiracy theories, warned you about them. Some got offended with C.I. for that. She knows all the dirt. She also can connect a certain writer with the CIA and an effort to destroy a Civil Rights march. A certain respected 'left' writer. I really wouldn't piss C.I. off these days because she's not in the mood.
And who is when we live in a world where Media Lens lies nonstop?
Only a "minority of bigots" have attacked the two women. Not true. The women have been called liars, CIA dupes, CIA assets, CIA agents, you name it. It was not in passing or minor. It was Ray McGovern, it was Michael Moore, it was Keith Olbermann, it was Naomi Wolf, it was Naomi Klein, it was so very, very many.
And to 'prove' this was true, they needed to find a 'report' written by a man who is down with Holocaust deniers.
There's been no "group of media feminists joins the assault on Julian Assange and WikiLeaks." Now Sunday there will be because we've tried to be nice but now we're going to call out WikiLeaks. But we have been drawing a line between Assange and WikiLeaks. A
Media Lens insists "slut-shaming" didn't occur and then demonstrate that they don't even know what the term means. It does not mean you have to call someone a "slut." It means you infer they had whatever coming because they did this or that.
Feminists are then accused of having been evil and wrong. And poor Julian Assange.
Here's reality, I've yet to read one feminist -- UK or US -- who has said "Julian Assange is guilty." Now I've read and heard John Pilger, Michael Moore, et al say that the women were liars. But all feminists have done is stated that we don't need to attack two women and we don't know what happened.
In other words, Media Lens is upset that feminists are calling for people to wait for the facts. And that outrages Media Lens. But it's okay for others to insult the women and to launch investigations on them, to try to dig up dirt on them, to hound them, to run one out of her country and more. That's fine. But callling for people not to rush to judgment isn't fair to the man.
Media Lens is full of s**t. I'm just not in the mood for this crap.
This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Friday: