AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:
A new study that concludes there's no need to cut back on red and processed meats has created as much confusion as buzz. The findings contradict the advice from major health groups, including the American Heart Association and the American Cancer Society. But as NPR's Allison Aubrey reports, the controversy has not changed the advice many dietitians have been giving for years.
ALLISON AUBREY, BYLINE: Elizabeth Ward is a registered dietitian who's counseled people on healthy eating for the last 15 years. She says when it comes to red meat, there are lots of questions.
ELIZABETH WARD: People are confused about meat, and this latest information doesn't add to anybody's understanding.
AUBREY: Despite all the noise, the idea that red meat, which includes beef, lamb and pork, is either the nutritional angel or devil is flawed. Neither is true. And she says the key, if you like to eat red meat, is to think about it as one component of a healthy diet.
WARD: Studies come out all the time, but the consensus is still that, you know, meat in moderation is perfectly fine for you.
AUBREY: So what does moderation look like on our plates? The answer depends on your weight, your age and your overall preferences. But a general rule of thumb - two to three servings per week is a range to consider. A serving should be about four ounces.
WARD: A four-ounce portion is slightly bigger than a deck of cards.
AUBREY: The American Institute for Cancer Research concludes eating more than 18 ounces of red meat per week can increase the risk of colorectal cancer. Ward's advice, which is based on the best available nutrition science, is to think about making meat more of a side dish rather than the main attraction in a meal.
I support the strikers and I hope you do too. There's a great article at WSWS that you should check out entitled "Why students and youth should support striking GM workers." I am not highlighting that tonight, though. I saw an article by Casey Gold at WSWS that I found to be as important as the strikers and I want to be sure everyone's aware of it. From Casey Gold's article:
The recent arrests of two 6-year-old children at their elementary school in Orlando, Florida has shone light on the shocking number of child arrests and detainments in the United States. A report by ABC News on Monday noted that nearly 30,000 children under the age of 10 have been arrested just between 2013 and 2017.
The arrest and detainment of children for the crime of acting their age will continue, and indeed increase, as social inequality worsens and the ruling class marches toward authoritarian rule.
The FBI recently released its annual crime statistics for the year 2018. While the report boasts that the arrest of juveniles decreased by 11 percent from 2017, the number of arrests of individuals under 18 still stands at a staggering 718,962. This number includes 3,500 children under 10, more than 38,000 children between 10 and 12, and more than 355,000 children between the ages of 13 and 16.
These statistics only account for 28 specific offenses, and the FBI’s website where this data is available notes, “The program does not collect data regarding police contact with a juvenile who has not committed an offense, nor does it collect data on situations in which police take a juvenile into custody for his or her protection.”
It is not clear under what circumstances the police would make contact with juveniles who have not committed an offense, nor is it understandable in what situation a child should be arrested for “protection.”
That is appalling. I hope it gets a lot of attention, it needs it. This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Tuesday:
Tuesday, October 1, 2019. Protests in Iraq over corruption, in the US
Joe Biden defenders continue attempting to defend and/or deny Joe's
unethical conduct.
In Iraq today, a major protest. In fact, another major protest. It is at least the third major protest in the last seven days. Last week, Lawk Ghafuri (RUDAW) reported:
Protestors demanding government action on postgraduate unemployment were hosed down with Iraqi security force water cannons on Wednesday, in an act condemned by a national human rights commission as an act “against freedom of expression.”
Iraqi master’s degree and PhD holders have been protesting outside ministry buildings in Baghdad since June, calling for measures to ease unemployment among postgraduates, including an increase in public sector jobs.
A video recorded by a protestor and published on social media on Wednesday shows water cannons being used to disperse protestors in front of the Council of Ministers in Baghdad.
Protestors, some of whom can be seen wearing graduation sashes, are knocked to the ground by the sheer force of the cannons. Other protestors rush to their aid.
“This is how Iraqi postgraduates are being treated in Iraq,” said the protestor recording events, who proceeds to call on Muqtada al-Sadr, the United Nations, the European Union and the entire world to come to their assistance.
Sunday, journalist Mustafa Habib reported:
In Iraq today, a major protest. In fact, another major protest. It is at least the third major protest in the last seven days. Last week, Lawk Ghafuri (RUDAW) reported:
Protestors demanding government action on postgraduate unemployment were hosed down with Iraqi security force water cannons on Wednesday, in an act condemned by a national human rights commission as an act “against freedom of expression.”
Iraqi master’s degree and PhD holders have been protesting outside ministry buildings in Baghdad since June, calling for measures to ease unemployment among postgraduates, including an increase in public sector jobs.
A video recorded by a protestor and published on social media on Wednesday shows water cannons being used to disperse protestors in front of the Council of Ministers in Baghdad.
Protestors, some of whom can be seen wearing graduation sashes, are knocked to the ground by the sheer force of the cannons. Other protestors rush to their aid.
“This is how Iraqi postgraduates are being treated in Iraq,” said the protestor recording events, who proceeds to call on Muqtada al-Sadr, the United Nations, the European Union and the entire world to come to their assistance.
Sunday, journalist Mustafa Habib reported:
Now, today, Mohammed Rwanduzy (RUDAW) reports:
Hundreds of Iraqis protested in Baghdad’s Tahrir Square on Tuesday to express diverse, long-brewing grievances, including, a lack of basic services, rampant corruption, and unequal treatment within the Iraqi Army.
Civilian protestors expressed anger about the Friday dismissal of Iraqi Army commander Lt. Gen. Abdul Wahab al-Saadi, credited with the defeat of the Islamic State (ISIS) in Iraq, from the Iraqi Counter-Terrorism Services (ICTS). Civilian protestors holding pictures of al-Saadi disapproved of his subsequent transfer to the Ministry of Defense.
“We don't want this is corrupt government,” civilians chanted, while others extended their discontent to the parliament and presidency. “All are corrupt equally,” a protestor said.
Mustafa Habib notes:
Here are some more Tweets about the protest.
Protest against the government in Tahrir Square, Baghdad #iraq #socialtrouble hozint.com/?utm_source=tw…
Dozens of people gathered today morning in Tahrir Square in #Baghdad following calls on social media to protest against the government.
Hundreds of Iraqis protest in #Baghdad’s Tahrir Square to express diverse, long-brewing grievances, including, a lack of basic services
Hundreds of #Iraqi people gathered at the #Tahrir square in central #Baghdad to protest at a lack of services, rampant #corruption and high unemployment rates.
And it's not just Baghdad.
There are protests in Iraq today in Baghdad, Basra and Missan >
The heavily fortified Green Zone remains off limits to the average Iraqi. The home of the US fortress that houses State Dept personnel and others was again zoned off from the Iraqi people today.
Iraqi forces close Al Jumhuriya bridge to prvent demonstrators to reach Green Zone. They want to protest the government's perceived inefficiency and corruption & lack of employment opportunities in the country. #Iraq
Meanwhile AFP reports:
Iraq's premier has said for the first time that his government had "indications" Israel was behind some attacks on paramilitary bases this summer, but stopped short of making an explicit accusation.
Hashd al-Shaabi, otherwise known as the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), has blamed the series of explosions at its bases and arms depots on Israel and the US, but the central government had so far said it was still investigating.
In a first, Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi told Al-Jazeera television in an interview aired Monday that those investigations were nearing a conclusion.
AFP fails to note that the first public finger pointing at Israel for these bombings took place in July and was led by the Israeli press (see the July 30th Iraq snapshot). In addition, the US government has whispered to the US press that Israel is behind the attacks (see the August 23rd snapshot). Seth J. Frantzman (JERUSALEM POST) observes:
Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi said that “investigations into the targeting of some Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) positions indicate that Israel carried it out,” in his first direct comments blaming Jerusalem. This is the first time he spoke so clearly about a series of mysterious attacks since July that have targeted munitions facilities of the PMF. The PMU are a group of mostly Shi’ite militias, some of which are closely tied to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
In the past voices in Iraq have sought to blame Israel but have been reticent to do so clearly. Elements within the PMU have instead held the US responsible, claiming that the US allowed Israel to carry out the attacks. These reports appeared in foreign Arabic media sometimes, but there was not a robust response because the PMU didn’t know what the best response was. So why would Abdul-Mahdi, who faces many challenges at home, decide to blame Israel now?
It appears that the Iraqi Prime Minister is blaming Israel at this juncture because he is being targeted for criticism for removing a key member of the Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) named Lt. General Abdul Wahab Al-Saadi. Al-Saadi was a popular deputy commander of the CTS, Iraq’s most elite unit. He played a key role defeating ISIS. However he was suddenly sidelined last week and the Prime Minister is being criticized across the political spectrum. However Abdul-Mahdi’s office has said the decision is irreversible and has said Al-Saadi must adhere to it. In addition rumors have been spread against the commander, suggesting he visited foreign embassies. The Prime Minister sought to blame the CTS for the decision on Monday, suggesting that the chief of staff wanted Al-Saadi out of the way.
Turning to the US where the race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination continues.
Elizabeth Warren has overtaken Joe Biden as the top 2020 choice among college students, according to a new College Reaction/Axios poll.
But it's not just Elizabeth.
Democrats Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders both poll higher than Joe at present. In addition, President Donald Trump, a Republican, polls higher than Joe at present.
The always ridiculous opportunist Matthew Dowd (conservative hack who tries to pretend he's converted to the center) rushes to save Joe from himself.
This can and is simultaneously true: what Hunter Biden did was unseemly and possibly unethical, and there isn’t an ounce of evidence that Joe Biden did anything wrong or untoward.
No, that can't be simultaneously true, you War Hawk idiot. Joe did to things "wrong and untoward." He allowed his son Hunter to profit from the position Joe held. (Joe also let his brother James do the same.) That is unethical. For Dowd to be correct about "there isn't an ounce of evidence that Joe Biden did anything wrong or untoward," Joe would have to insist today that he's only just now learning about the money Hunter raked in from Ukraine and from China or that James raked in from Iraq. These deals took place while Joe was vice president. They were known. Joe should have told his family to stop grifting. He didn't. And they continued to grift. That's unethical and, yes, it is untoward and, yes, it is wrong.
BREAKING: After Joe Biden claimed that he never discussed his son’s foreign business dealings with him,
A photo surfaced, from 2014, showing the former VP and his son golfing with a board member of the Ukrainian company that paid Hunter Biden $50k a month.
This. Is. Corruption.
Why did that happen? Because Hunter was being paid for access to the White House. That's unethical.
Andrew Stein (NEW YORK POST) argues:
Biden’s corrupt dealings in
Ukraine and those of his son must be investigated, and the time has come
for him to drop out of the presidential race.
While Biden served as vice president, his son Hunter was unaccountably making $50,000 a month “consulting”
in an industry with which he was totally unfamiliar (energy), in a
notoriously graft-prone country where he didn’t speak the language
(Ukraine). Hunter made similarly sketchy deals with China.
President Trump’s phone call this summer with his Ukrainian counterpart may have been ill-advised,
but it simply didn’t rise to an impeachable offense. Meanwhile, the
American people deserve to know the truth about the Biden family’s
lucrative dealings with other countries during the Obama
administration.
Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Ethel Mertz, Whistle-blower' went up last night.
Kat's review of Stevie Nicks' STAND BACK "Kat's Korner: Just an invitation would have been just fine" went up Sunday.
The following sites updated:
