Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Where we stand now

Where do we stand now as a country?

I think Justin Raimondo (Antiwar.Com) sums it up best:

You can tell the American empire is on its last legs because its ruling classes have already declared open warfare on their less fortunate subjects. The puffed-up arrogance and exhibitionistic wealth and behavior of these worthies is something that even a Bourbon would know enough to refrain from flaunting. But our elites are on a suicide mission.
For decades, the corporate and ideological tribes that have ruled this country have looted it within an inch of its life. The tremendous wealth created by what used to be the freest economy in the world has been monopolized by a tiny minority of crony capitalists at the top of the pyramid. Hi-tech oligarchs who look like tenth graders and have the mentality of high school hall monitors have seized control of the commanding heights of the culture and turned it into a nightmarish mix of Mr. Roger’s Neighborhood and Nineteen Eight-Four. Instead of adapting themselves to the views of the American people, our two political parties have adopted ideologies that have very little to do with the concerns of ordinary citizens. Instead, we are subjected to tirades from the Democrats about how the Russian government is in de facto everyday control of the White House and that the best thing we can hope for is a coup d'├ętat.

And that's where we are and why there is so much hatred in the country.

We tell people, "Just vote.  It doesn't matter who you vote for, just take part."

But we see that just vote is nothing but two meaningless words.

They want you to vote -- but to vote how they tell you.

The press told you to vote for Hillary.

Enough people disagreed resulting in Trump as president.

And now the process is not respected nor is the outcome.

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Monday:

Monday, January 15, 2018.  Baghdad's slammed by bombings while political fusion takes place among various groups in their desperate plea to hold back thug Nouri al-Maliki.

Today is MLK Day.


Martin Luther King Jr. Spent the Last Year of His Life Detested By the Liberal Establishment by

The bipartisan political propaganda machine always sweeps such events under a rug until they are relegated to recent history.  And the corporate media makes sure any deviant explanation faces ridicule and shame as a .  And of course there are agents everywhere...

Happy Day! This holiday should be moved to the date when the US security state had him murdered.  Connect the dots:

Turning to Iraq . . .

The strongly condemns this morning attack in Tayaran Square, Baghdad. Our government and the people of Iraq offer their condolences and full support to all those affected.

The Baghdad government serves up "their condolences and full support" to those attacked outside the Green Zone.  Almost as if the Baghdad-based government, within the Green Zone, is another country.  But then, it really is, isn't it?

Terrible news from where many have been killed and injured in a double suicide attack in .
My thoughts are with all those affected by this horrific and disgusting crime.

AMN reported earlier this morning that Baghdad was slammed by twin bombings leaving at least 16 people dead and 64 more injured. 

: Number of killed and injured reaches 79 following twin bomb blasts in early morning.


RT notes that the official death toll is now 38.  Mohammed Ebraheem (IRAQI NEWS) reports on Salim al-Jaoburi, the Speaker of Parliament:

During a parliament session, Jabouri urged “maintaining national unity in Iraq and making the utmost use of the great victory achieved over terrorism.”
“We condemn the terrorist acts that targeted innocent people in the Iraqi capital Baghdad and we call on security bodies to take required measures to protect citizens,” Jabouri said.

But what national unity?

Saturday, we noted these Tweets:

This is confirmed: PM Haider al-Abadi have reached a final agreement with the PMU fictions including Badr, Asaib Ahl al-Haq, Hiblollah and al-Nujaba to run for the election in a united coalition.

The coalition which is led by Abadi is called Nasr al-Iraq or The Victory of Iraq: all PMU factions, Ibrahim al-Jafari, Shahristani's party and Islamic Supreme Council among others.

  • Haider al-Abadi will run on the top of the coalition in Baghdad followed by Hadi al-Amiri and sources tell me the coalition will go into alliance with Maliki's State of Law coalition and Muqtada al-Sadr's coalition after the elections.

  • There are few Sunnis in the coalition including Iraq's former defence minister Khalid al-Obaidi.

  • Iran has played a major role in the agreement between Abadi and PMU.

  • And two last notes: the US is not happy with Abadi’s agreement to run with the PMU and the agreement will largely kill Abadi’s ‘anti-corruption battle’ given many of those in the list of targeted are close to the parties that are in his coalition now.

  • And now several Iraqi sources say Qasem Soleimani was in Baghdad in the afternoon of Saturday in which he attended a long quadrilateral-meeting with Abadi, Hadi Amiri and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis which resulted in the final agreement to run for elections together.

    In response to that news?  Only one person appears to be speaking out.  ALARABIYA reports:

    The leader of the Sadrist movement political party, Muqtada al-Sadr, criticized the new electoral alliance of Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi with the Iranian backed Popular Mobilization Unit (PMU) militias.
    Sadr, one of the most influential religious and popular figures in Iraq, issued a statement issued on Sunday describing the alliance as “an abhorrent political agreement.”
    He also expressed his deep surprise at the inclusion of the PMU militias calling them an “abhorrent sectarian dichotomy,” that is aimed at reproducing a “corrupt political class”.

    Mina Aldroubi (THE NATIONAL) adds:

    The Shiite cleric had previously announced his support for Mr Al Abadi and said that he would back his candidacy for a second term.
    However, Mr Al Sadr described the militias as “shameless” and considers the deal to “pave the way for the return of corruption and sectarianism”.
    The militias, known as Hashed Al Shaabi, are a Shiite-dominated alliance which remains deeply divisive and has been accused of a string of abuses.

    ASHARQ AL-AWSAT notes:

    Also on Sunday, the Hikma Movement headed by Ammar al-Hakim said it was joining the Abadi-Ameri alliance under the name of “the Nasr al-Iraq coalition,” or Victory.

    An Iraqi politician, who wished to remain anonymous, told Asharq Al-Awsat on Sunday that the decision of the Hikma Movement to join this alliance might strengthen Abadi’s situation and could guarantee his reelection for a second term.

    The politician said that all indicators reveal that Iran is backing Abadi, adding that it could be the force that encouraged Hash al-Shaabi to ally with the prime minister, a decision that places Nouri al-Maliki in a very difficult position.

    Was that the whole point?

    For Hayder to make sure Nouri didn't take his place?

    Nouri had a first term that wasn't good.  But it was his second term that really saw him carrying out non-stop abuses.

    Betting that the same won't be true of Hayder seems a long shot.

    He and Nouri were good friends until Hayder became prime minister.  Hayder belongs to Dawa (Nouri's political party) and is a member of State of Law (Nouri's political slate).

    The issue of displacement and voting is ignored by most outlets -- MIDDLE EAST MONITOR is one of the few to report on it.

    Marcia's "Tide pods" went up this morning as did Ava and my "Media: 'It's very rude of him,' she said, 'To come and spoil the fun!'."