| Friday, September 2, 2011.  Chaos and violence continue, Troy Yocum  completes his Hike for our Heroes   tomorrow in Louisville, Human Rights Watch calls out the bombing of northern  Iraq, additional info about the 2006 massacre of an Iraqi family by US forces,  and more.  Starting in the US, Hike for our Heroes  is  a non-profit started by Iraq War veteran Troy Yocum  who is  hiking across the country to raise awareness and money for veterans issues. He  began the walk last April. From the Facebook page :
 Iraq War Veteran Troy Yocum, his wife  Mareike and Emmie the super dog are hiking 7,000 miles across America to help  military families in need. They took their first steps of the 16-month  cross-country quest on April 17, 2010. Backed by corporate sponsors, many  volunteers and support members, Team Hike for our Heroes/Drum Hike are taking on  the challenge of raising needed funds by hiking 7000 miles across America. The  journey will take 16 months passing through 31 states and 38 large cities. The  team will have to average over 20 miles a day while enduring each season. Funds  donated go through The Wish Upon A Hero Foundation is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt  non-profit organization that seeks to supports the community of individuals  working online who grant the needs and wants of others making a wish. We believe  that no wish is too large, no hero is too small and that everyone can become a  hero. The idea for the hike has been evolving since Troy joined the Army in 2001  but it is now when our economy is struggling and military families are in most  need that he and his family will put one foot in front of another to connect and  help struggling families. Help our mission by making a donation today!
 The hike that began in Louisville, Kentucky over a year and a  half ago is scheduled to conclude there this Saturday at approximately 1:30 p.m.  Ken Neuhauser (Louisville Courier-Journal) notes ,  "Coincidentally, Louisville native and Iraq war veteran Troy Yocum will complete  his 'Hike for Our Heroes' campaign at 1:30 p.m. Saturday across the street at  the Louisville Slugger Museum, where he began his 7,000-mile cross-country trek  in April 2010. His accomplishment will be recognized as part of the Founder's  Day celebration." Devin Katayama (WFPL)  reports :
 Now he is  getting close and he said when he arrives at the finish line at the Louisville Slugger Museum  this weekend, he expects a  few thousand people to greet him.
 "I thought I could finish all 7,880 miles  in 15 months and instead we're coming into Louisville around a month and a half  late. And that's not a failure in my book. I take from this that perseverance is  key to accomplishing any goal and I've been working extra hard this year to make  it all the way to the finish line. It's almost surreal to be this close to home.  I just passed a sign that said 33 miles and that feels really good," said  Yocum.
 Late last night, Troy Tweeted , "Feels good to be  closing on what has been an incredible journey!" That's tomorrow at  approximately 1:30 in the afternoon.  His Tweets today include:          Hailed as a victorious milestone, the achievement merely reveals  the failure and disgrace of the Iraq War. [. . .]  Milestones apparently don't  have to consider civilian deaths, which reached 155 in  August.     Celeste Headlee: Also with us is Rossana Cambron whose son Arturo  Cambron is serving his third term in Iraq so that's the opinion of a retired  army col Rossana, what's your opinion as a mom?  Does it make you feel the  situation in Iraq is getting safer?   Rossana Cambron:  It's a difficult question to answer because if I  say "yes" people get the illusion that they can kind of rest, they apply it to  their current situation. But as a mother who has a son in the war it only brings  it down just a short notch to the concern I feel and the worry I feel.  It  doesn't really make a significant difference in how much I worry about my son  and his safety --   Celeste Headlee: Well --   Rossana Cambron:  -- in the overall scheme.   Celeste Headlee: -- have you noticed any change in the past few  months in his messages to you when he talks to you? Does he seem to feel like  things have gotten improved or safer there?   Rossana Cambron:  Well if we compare it to his first deployment  which was late '06, definitely there's less combat, there's less mission where  he goes out and he doesn't come back and mention maybe a snippet of what he may  have experienced.  But, again, I don't want to leave the illusion that it's a  great relief, that I've stopped worrying or that I can stop not looking out of  my window for somebody that's waiting to give me the bad news or walking up my  door -- or things like that. It's not like that. It's just a -- shave off a thin  layer of the worry that I have every day, the concern I have every day.       Reviewing the month's violence and starting with what was reported by the  media (and noted in the snapshots).  August 1st , 2 dead and four injured; August 2nd , 6 dead and thirty-three injured; August 3rd , 18 dead and eleven wounded; August 4th , 3 dead and fourteen injured; August 5th , 1 dead and fifteen injured; August 6th , 1 dead and three wounded; August 7th , 6 dead and eight injured; August 8th , 8 dead and twenty-four wounded; August 9th , five wounded; August 10th , 1 dead and seventeen injured; August 11th , 5 dead and seventy-one injured; August 12th , five injured;  August 13th ,  3 dead and thirteen wounded; August 14th ,  6 dead and eight injured; August 15th , 75 dead and two-hundred-and-fifty  injured; August 16th , 8 dead and thirteen injured; August 17th , 8 dead and twenty-two wounded; August 18th , 10 dead and twenty-one injured; August 19th , 3 dead and six injured; August 20th , four were reported injured; August 21st , 8 dead and twelve injured; August 22nd , 6 dead and eight injured; August 23rd , no reports (the next day will find  Reuters dropping back to cover the 23rd) ; August 24th , 8 dead and twenty-four wounded; August 25th , 23 dead and seventy-one injured; August 26th , 3 dead and nine injured; August 27th , 14 dead and twenty-six injured; August 28th ,  35 dead and fifty-four injured; August 29th , 6 dead and thirty-eight injured; August 30th , 2 dead and eleven injured; August 31st , 4 dead and thirty-five  wounded.  That's 262 dead and 855 injured. Iraqi Body Count  counted 395 civilians killed (our 262 count  is all killed, not just civilians -- the 262 leaves out Turkish and PKK claims  on how many PKK fighters were killed due to the fact that the two sets of number  conflict).   A  U.S. military spokesman, Major Tim Keefe, said that the U.S. military has no  information to support the allegations and that he had not heard of them before  a reporter brought them to his attention Sunday.     Again, it must be a kind of viral outrage that comes and goes. Monday's snapshot noted , "Over the weekend, Al Rafidayn reported  that the Grand  Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani has refused to meet with Nouri al-Maliki and other  politicians. For the last 8 weeks, al-Sistani has refused them. Why? His clerics  say that he feels the people's needs are not being addressed and that the  government has failed to deliver basic services and to reduce corruption." Aswat al-Iraq reports  today Ahmed  al-Safi, the Grand Ayatollah's representative, called out today "the absence of  trust among political entities" (and it's seen as if the criticism was coming  from the Grand Ayatollah). Meanwhile the Great Iraqi Revolution  and other youth activists are gearing  up for September 9th when they resume protests in Baghdad's Tahrir Square (and  elsewhere in Iraq as well). Aswat al-Iraq notes  that today Baghdad  saw a smaller protest -- "citizens and civil activists" -- calling for US fores  to leave, for an end to corruption and for better public services.    Yesim Comert and Ivan Watson (CNN  -- link has text and video) reported yesterday afternoon on Kurds  protesting in Istanbul. Riot police were sent in, stones and "petrol bombs" were  hurled, tear gas was utilized. The reporters note, "The protest in Istanbul  Thursday began fairly peacefully. Women in traditional Kurdish costumes led a  column of thousands of people, many of them waving BDP flags and carrying  banners that said 'peace now immediately' and 'long live the brotherhood of  people'." The protests come as these Kurds in Turkey feel the government that  has long oppressed them is not following up on the promises of equality and  dignity that were made in the last few years. The protests also come as Turkey  is in the midst of bombing Kurds in northern Iraq.   Throughout the Iraq War, Turkey has bombed northern Iraq. Starting in 2007,  they had approval from Nouri al-Maliki and the US government to conduct the  bombings and they also were provided with 'intelligence' by the US military  including imagery via US drones flown over the region. As the Turkish press has  made clear in the last two weeks, the US continues to provide 'intelligence.'  Turkey insists that they are defending themselves from the PKK -- a group of  Kurdish people who advocate for and fight for a Kurdish land.
 The PKK is  one of many Kurdish groups which supports and fights for a Kurdish homeland. Aaron Hess (International Socialist  Review) described them in 2008 , "The PKK emerged in 1984 as a  major force in response to Turkey's oppression of its Kurdish population. Since  the late 1970s, Turkey has waged a relentless war of attrition that has killed  tens of thousands of Kurds and driven millions from their homes. The Kurds are  the world's largest stateless population -- whose main population concentration  straddles Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria -- and have been the victims of  imperialist wars and manipulation since the colonial period. While Turkey has  granted limited rights to the Kurds in recent years in order to accommodate the  European Union, which it seeks to join, even these are now at risk." The  Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq has been a concern to Turkey because they  fear that if it ever moves from semi-autonomous to fully independent -- such as  if Iraq was to break up into three regions -- then that would encourage the  Kurdish population in Turkey. For that reason, Turkey is overly interested in  all things Iraq. So much so that they signed an agreement with the US government  in 2007 to share intelligence which the Turkish military has been using when  launching bomb raids. However, this has not prevented the loss of civilian life  in northern Iraq. Back to Aaron Hess, he noted, "The Turkish establishment sees  growing Kurdish power in Iraq as one step down the road to a mass separatist  movement of Kurds within Turkey itself, fighting to unify a greater Kurdistan.  In late October 2007, Turkey's daily newspaper Hurriyet accused the prime  minister of the KRG, Massoud Barzani, of turning the 'Kurdish dream' into a  'Turkish nightmare'."
 Nouri's been very good about keeping the press out  of the PKK camps. The Times of London,  which is no longer in Iraq, repeatedly went to the area to report on what was  taking place there and visited the rebel camps. Many other outlets just followed  Nouri's dictate. Those who did report from the camps were able to demonstrate  that (a) this wasn't taking place in hiding and (b) the mountains had other  inhabitants as well.
 Nouri's turning those mountains in northern Iraq  into a no-press zone was very effective in covering up the toil the bombings  were taking on civilians in the region.
 This go round, what's really  different is that the press paid attention to the fact that farmers and  shepherds were being displaced, turned into refugees as they were forced to flee  their villages due to the bombings. What's really different is that the deaths  of civilians are finally getting attention. And when Turkey issues their  ridiculous 'we didn't kill those civilians, that bomb must have been dropped by  someone else' claim (see "Mars Attacks Iraq "),  it only ensures that the bombings receive even more attention.
 As long  as Turkey could assert that they were just bombing rebels and it was in response  to what rebels had done (and as long as everyone agreed to play stupid and  pretend that the PKK sprung from the head of Zeus yesterday and that the Turkish  government's actions didn't in fact create the PKK), everyone could just focus  on how many bombs dropped and the claims by the Turkish military of killed X  number of rebels and the holler back from the PKK of 'no, you didn't.'
 The Turkish government seems genuinely baffled that something they've  been doing repeatedly for years now is all the suddent a hot issue. At the start  of this week, New Sabah did an article  on some of  the Turkish news coverage of the bombings and noted the Turkish government's  stated position that the PKK were terrorists and that Iraq must "clean your land  of these terrorists or we will do it for you."
 That bully talk used to  go over well but now as the bombings create refugees -- forcing hundreds of  families to flee -- and as the dead includes not only civilians but small  children, the bully talk really isn't being applauded by those who once cheered  Turkey on.
 And it also doesn't help Turkey's case that northern Iraq is  also being bombed by the Iranian military who are also targeting Kurdish rebels.  So you've got two countries terrorizing the people of Iraq and destroying the  land with these bombs -- as in turning into pockmarked fields -- and probably  creating long term health issues because these bombs are probably going to  effect the environment. [Today the Great Iraqi Revolution notes , "Imagine if we were  not bombed with the lethal American weapons, we would not have had hundreds of  thousands of malformed and disabled Iraqi children. Again the Iraqi will beat  all odds, great voice and performance."]  Even without Iran, the bully position  that Turkey's government has taken would probably have gotten old by now on its  own and people's patience would have worn thin as well. But Turkey truly seemed  to believe that they could continue bombing year after year and the  international community would never object.
 Those days, as the Turkish  government is learning, are over. Human Rights Watch issued the  following today :
 (Beirut) –  Iran and Turkey's cross-border attacks in Iraqi Kurdistan  have killed at least 10 civilians and displaced  hundreds since mid-July 2011, Human Rights Watch said today. Some of the attacks  may have been carried out without sufficient attempts to ensure minimal impact  on civilians, Human Rights Watch said.
       Both Iran  and Turkey  say that their military  operations, including artillery and aerial bombardments, are aimed at armed  groups operating out of Iraqi Kurdistan along the northern and eastern borders.  When Human Rights Watch visited those areas in August, Iraqi residents and  officials said that many of the targeted areas are purely civilian and are not  being used by the armed groups. Evidence suggests that the regular Iranian bombardments may be an attempt  to force Iraqi civilians out of some areas near the Iranian border.
 "Year after year, civilians in northern Iraq have suffered from these  cross-border attacks, but the situation right now is dire," said Joe Stork , deputy Middle East director at Human Rights  Watch. "Iran and Turkey should do all they can to protect civilians and their  property from harm, no matter what the reason for their attacks in Iraqi  Kurdistan."
 Iran started its cross-border attacks in northern Iraq in  mid-July, claiming to be targeting an armed group associated with the Iranian  Kurdish Party for Free Life of Kurdistan (PJAK) operating in the mountainous  border region. Beginning on August 18, Turkey carried out attacks across its  border with Iraq, targeting the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), an armed group  affiliated with PJAK that is fighting its own decades-long conflict with  Turkey.Shelling by Iran
Since mid-July, Iran's operations  against PJAK inside or near villages close to the Iranian border have led to the  displacement of hundreds of families, caused the deaths of at least three  villagers, and wounded an unknown number of people, according to international  humanitarian aid organizations, Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) officials,  and media reports. Farmers from the border regions told Human Rights Watch in  early August that the shelling had damaged their homes and that they saw Iranian  soldiers cross the border into Iraq and kill farmers' livestock. The attacks on  civilians and their property that they described were similar to attacks documented by Human Rights  Watch  in June 2010. Human Rights Watch visited the Choman and Qalat Diza districts and Qasre,  Sangasar, and Zharawa subdistricts between July 26 and August 6 and interviewed  more than a dozen displaced villagers as well as others in villages still being  shelled. All villagers interviewed said that Kurdish armed groups had never been  in their areas and that there were no other military targets in the vicinity at  any point before or during the shelling. The affected areas are in the Qandil  Mountains, along the eastern borders of Erbil and Sulaimaniyaprovinces, in the  region administered by the KRG. In the crowded Gojar tent camp in Sulaimaniya province, Fatima Mahmoud, 70,  told Human Rights Watch she fled there with 11 family members in late July,  after two Iranian shells struck her house in the village of Sune, 30 kilometers  west of Qalat Diza. She said the village mosque and school were also damaged by  shelling. "It has been more than six years that Iran has been shelling our area, but  this year, it was unbelievable," she said. "I don't know why Iran is shelling  our village – we have never seen any PJAK members at all. I have never seen any  [PJAK] members in our village." Attacks by Turkey
On August 18, Turkey began a bombing  and artillery campaign against the PKK, which it blamed for earlier fatal  attacks in Turkey. On August 21, according to Iraqi officials, Turkish warplanes  bombed a vehicle carrying civilians. The attack killed seven members of the same  extended family according to relatives of those killed, local officials, and  media workers. Turkey denied its planes were responsible.
 
 The family  group, which included four children, was driving on a highly travelled main  roadway in a white 2011 Nissan pickup truck from the village of Bole to Rania to  visit relatives. Shamal Hassan told Human Rights Watch on August 29 that the  attack instantly killed his wife, Rezan, and his daughters, Solin, two months  old, and Sonya, 18 months old. The attack also killed his wife's parents and two  other children.
 An emotional Hassan told Human Rights Watch, "The attack was so destructive  that we couldn't recognize their bodies. I want the international community to  hold Turkey accountable. They ruined my life."
 Media photos released by  multiple Iraqi Kurdish news organizations of the scene corresponded with  Hassan's description, and showed charred and disembodied children and adults  splayed on the ground near the remnants of a destroyed vehicle. Human Rights  Watch could not independently verify the authenticity of the photographs. There  has been no evidence of any military target in the vicinity.
 While the Turkish military said that it has killed more than 145 suspected  PKK militants with artillery fire and airstrikes in northern Iraq since August  17, it has denied that its warplanes killed the family, saying only that news  footage of the destroyed vehicle was not consistent with damage caused by  Turkish aerial bombardment. However, Turkish officials have stated that Turkish  warplanes were bombing multiple military targets, such as anti-aircraft guns and  ammunitions caches, in the area at the time. Iraqi political and military officials have repeatedly blamed Turkish  warplanes for the attack. An August 28 statement from the KRG stated that "[KRG]  President Barzani strongly condemned Turkish military attacks," which it said  were responsible for the seven deaths. Civilian DisplacementAbdulwahid Gwani, mayor of the  Choman district, which has been particularly hard-hit by Iranian shelling, told  Human Rights Watch that the attacks by Iran and Turkey had cumulatively killed 9  civilians and displaced 325 families from Choman and 500 families in the Sidakan  area. "They [Iran and Turkey] don't differentiate between civilians and armed  groups, and the bombardments are more intense compared with last year," Gwani  said. "We notice that the Turkish bombardments are more random this year – they  used to target specific locations in previous years but now it is kind of  arbitrary." Earlier in August, Gwani and several displaced villagers told Human Rights  Watch, the attacks forced hundreds of poor farmers to leave their crops  unattended, destroying much of this year's harvest. A number of farmers told  Human Rights Watch that because there has been shelling each year during the  short planting and harvesting season, they believed it showed an intentional  effort to drive civilians from the area by harming their livelihood. As in past years, aid organizations and local municipalities have struggled  to meet the displaced families' basic needs. The Kurdistan government does not  keep an official registry of displaced villagers. The representative of an international humanitarian aid organization  working in the affected areas told Human Rights Watch on August 30 that the  attacks have led to the displacement of 450 families, but that this number  includes only families who have resettled in tent camps, and not those still  moving around, staying with their families, or elsewhere. A delegation of Iraqi  civil society organizations from Baghdad visited the areas on August 3 and  reported the displacement of "up to 750 families from the areas of Choman, Sidi  Khan and Haji Omran." The International Organization for Migration told Human Rights Watch on  August 26 that it has so far distributed aid to approximately 295 families in  tent camps – 275 families in Sulaimaniya and 20 in Erbil – but that another  roughly 300 families from Erbil have been displaced and may require future  aid. Government Reactions In August, the Iraqi government  summoned both Iran's and Turkey's ambassadors in Baghdad because of concern  about the operations, and both the Iraqi and KRG parliaments have strongly  condemned the attacks.   On July 27, an Iraqi parliamentary official who declined to be named told  Human Rights Watch that, during a meeting with a high-level Iranian diplomat  that day, the diplomat stressed the "importance to Iran" of creating a buffer  zone along the Iranian border "with no residents." The official said that the  diplomat also suggested deploying the Iraqi army to the area, instead of the  Kurdistan regional forces who now patrol the border, because the Iraqis are not  "as close" to the Kurdish residents. Officials of both the KRG and the central government in Baghdad have told  Human Rights Watch in recent weeks that Iran and Turkey have been defiant and  dismissive in their private responses. Publicly, both countries contend that  they have a right to attack the armed groups inside northern Iraq and both  countries deny targeting civilians. At an August 21 news conference in Turkey, Deputy Prime Minister Bekir  Bozdağ said that the militaryoperations "will continue without hesitation when  necessary." The governor of Iran's West Azarbaijan Province, Vahid Jalalzadeh,  told Iranian state television on August 6 that, "The operation against the group  [PJAK] will continue until all members are killed," but called reports of  Iranian soldiers crossing into Iraq "rumors." The PKK and PJAK both openly admit to multiple guerrilla attacks against  Turkish or Iranian soldiers in a self-proclaimed struggle for ethnic equality  for Kurds in those countries. Both are considered terrorist organizations by the  United States and European Union. "The evidence suggests that Turkey and Iran are not doing what they need to  do to make sure their attacks have a minimum impact on civilians, and in the  case of Iran, it is at least quite possibly deliberately targeting civilians,"  Stork said. "Regardless of their reasons for carrying out attacks, they need to  respect international humanitarian law." 
There are many changes that the latest wave of bombings didn't  anticipate. Sazan M. Mandalawi (niqash) reports :
Just like their neighbours in other countries, young  Kurdish people in Iraq are using the Internet and social media to call for  political action. A recent protest in Erbil against Turkish bombing in the area  saw protests swiftly organised: NIQASH was there from the beginning.  
Shko Nawroly knows only too well why  he is taking part in a protest against Turkish military ingressions into Iraq.  "I was born in Iran because my parents were Peshmergas [Kurdish freedom  fighters] and they had to run away from Saddam's bombing," explained Nawroly,  referring to former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's persecution of the Kurdish  people in Iraq's north. 
"So I know  how it feels when you have to flee to survive bombing and air attacks. And I  know how it feels when your family is massacred. And this is why I decided to  take part in organizing the protests against the bombing raids carried out by  the Turkish warplanes on Kurdish soil," the 23-year-old said passionately. "And  as a human being it's a moral responsibility." 
But unlike their parents and grandparents who fought  on the mountains, today's Kurdish youth are using education, technology, the  Internet and social networks as well as peaceful rallies to prevent history  repeating itself.   |