| Friday, March 25, 2011.  Chaos and violence continue,  Iraqis turn out to  protest across the country, Nouri attempts to diminish turnout be utilizing his  usual tactics, Iraq is facing big water issues, a promise on electricity  surfaces, and more.   It's Friday and, yes, protests continued in Iraq.  And because the  government disrespects the people's right to freely express themselves, roads into Baghdad's Tahrir Square were yet again  blocked. Wamith Al-Kassab (MidEastYouth) reports  that Iraqi forces shut down the streets around Thrir Square yesterday and  encircled them with barbed wire to prevent protesters." Al  Mada reports on what the youth movement protesters were  saying, that they have been protesting since February 26th to bring about a  better Iraq and that the government cannot hide behind the walls of the Green  Zone.  Deutsche Presse-Agentur reports that  despite "heavy rains" and "tight security measures," hundreds of Iraqis  protested in Baghdad's Liberation Square.  At the Great Iraqi Revolution Facebook page, Hind Burgif wonders, "was it realy rain or baghdad crying and  call iraqi people to help her and set her free???"  Wedding Shawki and Adham Youssef (Al Mada) report on  the demonstrations noting Iraqi security forces (again) used batons and water  cannons while protecting themselves with shields (Youssef's photo shows a man  with a menacing baton apparently aimed at a woman who is no threat to herself or  anyone else). Iraqi women were a highly visible presence in today's protest in  Baghdad and the article notes that women have been a part of the recent  demonstrations, helping to demonstrate what a true picture of a democratic Iraq  could look like.  They then speak with women participating in the demonstrations  like feminist Hmamonov Yousef Taher who feels the presence of women in protests  helps reduce violence ("women's presence can lead the authorities to refrain  from violence and it can reduce violence on the part of demonstrators") and is  bothered by the inability of some to include women, noting the need to reach out  with the message as well as obstacles that prevent women's participation (such  as the curfew).  She feels that the government's response to the protest with  curfews and other repressive tactics has demonstrated the government's own  failure and that women will increase their participation in the demonstrations.   Sana, who is a poet, tells Al Mada, that women have bee participating in larger  numbers in other countries and outlines some factors which may influence  participation in Iraq.  She also feels that the presence of women can help  prevent the authorities from attacking the protesters.  The Association of Iraqi  Women's Suhaila Alaasm feels that women have been increasing participation  throughout the country's provinces.  She notes that women have been marginalized  in Nouri al-Maliki's Cabinet.  Like Sana, she points to the losses women have  suffered since the invasion of Iraq and the oppression.  The Baghdad Forum  Cultural Center's Zainab Kaabi notes that women are oppresed and the Institute  of Fine Arts' Precious Hashim notes that women face many obstacles but they will  be present more and more in future demonstrations because when you participate  and demonstrate for reform of Iraq you develop a taste for it and know that the  soul and the connection will provide life and redemption.  Mostafa Badr posts a photo of Iraqi women at  Liberation Square and notes, "Elderly women demonstrating today in Tahrir Square  demanding the release of their sons, husbands and brothers."  Nafee Alfatlayi notes, "The mourning father of one of  the demonstrators who was killed 4 days ago broke his mourning to attend the  demonstration, stating that his son who was an agricultural engineer was killed  4 days ago by government security forces but he is here in Tahrir Square to  uphold and support his son's stand."  Ibrahim Laebi reports, "Suppression of the press in  Tahrir Square, Baghdad, and the injury of 3 members of the press."   Mohammed Tawfeeq (CNN) reports on the Baghdad  protest and notes that women calling for the "government to release sons and  husbands who are in prison awaiting trial or investigation" were often "carrying  photos of their loved ones" and that "in Najaf, Diwaniya, Kut and Hilla --  Shiite provinces south of Baghdad -- hundreds of demonstrators rallied Friday  against unemployment and corruption, police said."  The Great Iraqi Revolution notes Iraqi forces were  sent to Ramadi and Falluja but protesters still turned out and  demonstrated ("thousands" in Falluja).  Mostafa Badr reports, "The people of Tikreet have  come out from the Grand Mosque, Tikreet, after Friday Prayers in a large  demonstration demanding the release of detainees and the change in government  and for the Parliament to go!!!!"  The Great Iraqi Revolution reports, "The People of  Babil are out in a very large demonstration demanding that Parliament and  government resign!"  And they report, "The Askeriein Regiment is  surrounding the Aisha Mosque in Sammarra'a in an attempt to break the large  demonstration taking place now despite suprresion tactics and methods -- the  people of Sammarra'a demand the exit of the Parliament and the government as  well as are refusing to sell their land around the 'Hathra'.  God Save Iraq all  Iraqis."     David Bacon's "EIGHT YEARS OF IRAQ'S OCCUPATION  - EIGHT YEARS OF MISERY" (Truth  Out):
 The war in Iraq is  supposedly over. The U.S. administration says the occupation, which began on  March 20 eight years ago, is ending as well, with the withdrawal of U.S. combat  troops. But as the U.S., Great Britain and France begin another military  intervention in North Africa, their respective administrations are silent about  the price Iraqis are paying for the last one.
 Not so the Iraqi, however. Demonstrations have taken  place in Baghdad, Basra and Kirkuk, among other cities, calling on the U.S. in  particular to stop its escalating military intervention in Libya. Iraqi unions  have been especially vocal, linking the U.S. invasion of Iraq with continued  misery for its working people. According to one union representative, Abdullah  Muhsin of the General Federation of Iraqi workers, "Eight years have ended since  the fall of Saddam's regime, yet the empty promises of the "liberators" - the  invaders and the occupiers who promised Iraqis heaven and earth - were simply  lies, lies and lies."
 The GFIW, which  supported the recent uprisings in North Africa and the Middle East, says the  U.S. should "allow the people of Libya, Bahrain and other countries to determine  their own destiny by themselves." Falah Alwan, president of the Federation of  Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq, says violence directed against workers and  unions is intended to keep a lid on protests against miserable living  conditions. "We are still under occupation," he charges. "The new Iraqi army,  created by the U.S. occupation, is doing the same job, protecting the corrupt  government while we are suffering from the difficulties of daily  life."
 "There's no electricity most of  the time, and no drinking water - no services at all," says Qasim Hadi,  president of the Union of Unemployed of Iraq. Eight years after the start of the  U.S. military intervention, "there's hardly even any repair of the war damage -  there's still rubble in the streets. People are going hungry."
 Despite often-extreme levels of violence in the years  of occupation, Iraqis have never stopped protesting these conditions. When  demonstrations broke out in other countries of the Middle East and North Africa,  people in Baghdad, Basra and Kirkuk had been taking to the streets for years. In  large part, protests continued in Iraq because living conditions never changed,  despite promises of what the fall of Saddam Hussein would  bring.
 
 
 David Bacon's  latest book is Illegal People -- How  Globalization Creates Migration and Criminalizes Immigrants (Beacon  Press) which won the CLR James Award.
 
 There was an attack on detainees in Rassafa Tasfeerat  Prison according to The Great Iraqi Revolution, a week  lon gattack, where "militias in plain clothes with knives and sharp instruments"  attack the detainees and they note, "Journalist, Sa'ad Al-Awsi who has been detained  for several months in Rassafa Prison in Baghdad on charges of terrorism, has an  hour ago, been kidnapped by armed militias from the prison dressed in their  black plain clothes uniform! Please mount a campaign for him -- they plan to  liquidate him. Imagine prison officers colluding all the time with  militias!"
 
   Meanwhile UPI notes UNICEF's report on Iraq's  water issue which includes that at least 1 million Iraqi children get their  water from 'open source' and that "water-borne illnesses like diarrhea are the  second-largest killer of Iraqi children." Iraq lacks a needed supply of potable  water. This is due to the fact that in his five years and counting as prime  minister, Nouri has failed to fix the infrastructure so Iraq's water contains  sewage and otehr items. The recommendation each summer -- as the yearly cholera  outbreak approaches -- is that Iraqis boil their water before drinking. Which is  possible for some. It's not, of course, possible for Iraqi orphans living on the  streets. A real answer would be for Nouri to spend some of those billions on  rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure but you can't prepare for a palatial,  post-prime minister life and also ensure that Iraqis' basic needs are met,  apparently.
 In Iraq, water is a major issue that's only become more of  one in recent months. They share a border with many countries. Iran has been a  problem with regards to water. There have been accusastions that Iran is  building dams to prevent the flow of water. More seriously in the immediate  term, the water is becoming too salty for consumption because water flowing into  Iraq through Iran has too much saline in it. Not only does that make for  problems with drinking water, it can be very bad for fertile land which might  otherwise be productive and help Iraq restart their agriculture sector -- Iraq  was the bread basket of the Middle East -- the Iraq War changed that as it did  so many things. Within Iraq, a new move may heighten tensions. AFP reports that the Kurdistan Regional  Government is constructing 11 damns with plans for an additional 28 to be built.  AFP notes  that "rainfall is now 60 percent below average" and that accusations were  already flying in Kirkuk that farmers were being denied needed water due to  Kurdistan dams.
 
 Yesterday on Morning Edition (NPR), Mike Shuster  reported on the efforts to rebuild the Askariya Shrine in Samarra and how it  was contributing to the tensions: "It is over this plan, which is expected to  generate millions of dollars, that new sectarian tensions have surfaced. The  development project remains firmly in the hands of the Shia community, not in  the hands of the city or provincial government, which are dominated by the  Sunnis, who make up a majority of Samarra's population. They resent being cut  out of what will almost certainly be a very rich project."  Many groups are  targeted in Iraq and that includes Iraqi Christians.  The latest wave of attacks  on Iraqi Christians began October 31st with the assault on Our Lady of Salvation  Church.  Sarah MacDonald (Catholic News Service)  reports that Erbil's archbishop, Father Bashar Warda, has stated that the  country has "near-genocide conditions" and, "We are living a region which cannot  decide if it is for democracy or Islamic law."   He notes 66 churches "attacked  or bombed" as well as 2 "convents, one monastery and a church orphanage".
     Intellectuals in Iraq have also been among the targeted populations.  Gumer  Isayev is the head of the St. Petersburg Center for the Study of the Modern  Middle East, a professor at St. Petersburg State University and has his  doctorate in history. Gazeta.ru interviews Isayev about events in Libya and  their relation to Iraq.   Q: Being an expert on the Middle East, how do you assess the  recent events in Libya? What's actually happening there, is it a "clash of  civilizations", a "crusade', an attempt to protect democracy in Libya, or an  attempt to overthrow Gaddafi's regime orchestrated by some countries, or perhaps  a war for Libya's natural resources, or still something  else? 
   A: Any attempts to explain the events in Libya drawing on the  abstract concepts produced by the West -- such as for instance the "clash of  civilizations" -- are doomed to fail just as much as the attempts to come up  with a strictly rational explanation. Revolutions, overthrows, and uprisings are  irrational by nature and often develop in an unpredictable manner which does not  fit any conventional theories. The events in Libya unrolled rapidly and were  shaped by a number of factors, and while both Egyptian and Tunisian presidents  gave up quite quickly, Muammar Gaddafi made it clear right away that he will  fight to the end. Consequently, the internal uprising against Gaddafi which  started in February developed into armed aggression against Libya by March, and  God knows what it will be like by April…  Obviously, the "uprising" in Libya was  inspired by popular unrest in the neighboring Arab countries. But unlike the  peaceful protests in Tunisia and Egypt, Libya's uprising was armed, and quite  possibly relied on some external support.  The revolution bug appears to have bitten a large number of Arab  countries, but in Libya it seems to have developed into an acute condition.  There are witnesses who confirm that the uprising was pre-planned, that groups  of youths attacked police and local authorities' buildings in different towns at  the same time. But the crucial role was played by the fact that Gaddafi secured  the support of a large share of the population, especially in the country's  capital and in the West. There were no massive protests in Tripoli, and the  rebellious East has demonstrated the breakaway ambitions of Cyrenaica that  Libyan Jamahiriya had already dealt with before (although the number of rebels  there did not exceed a few thousand). Gaddafi wisely waited out the critical  phase and went on to some successful attempts to re-unite the country but faced  serious counteraction from the West.
 The attempt to overthrow Gaddafi by "global effort" has been quite  cynical.  Libya's business partners, including Italy, France and other  European countries, which until recently were signing multi million dollar  contracts with Gaddafi now all of a sudden claimed his regime to be illegitimate  and openly took the rebels' side. It's no secret that Gaddafi has ceased to be a  thorn the West's side over the last decade as he gave up a number of notorious  projects related to development of weapons of mass destruction, let the U.S. oil  companies in on the Libyan market, paid compensation for the Lockerbie bombing,  and started liberalizing the domestic economy. Nevertheless, the colonel didn't  entirely "mend his ways": the Americans got hold only of a small share of  Libya's oil reserves; the Lockerbie bombing, though paid for, was never admitted  guilt for, and the project to privatize the state oil production company also  fell through. Gaddafi was actively promoting the idea of African unity and a  single currency pegged to gold, and he heavily criticized the West's policies in  Asia and Africa. Removal of sanctions in 2003 stimulated economic growth and  turned Libya in a rapidly developing economy capable of making Gaddafi's dream  come true i.e. turning Libya into the leading power of the region.   Therefore it is not about Gaddafi's Western partners suddenly  becoming appalled at his being cruel to the rebels. Western powers simply took  advantage of the situation, i.e. a temporary weakness of the Libyan leader, to  back up the uprising.   An unstable situation in Libya is in the European and U.S. hawks'  opinion better than a strong and ambitious Gaddafi. That is why the desperate  West started to stir up the almost gone fire of the civil war. And whereas for  the United States, this war would be across the ocean, Europe might harvest some  big problems ensuing from it in the very near future. And this tells us that in  fact European leaders followed their U.S.  counterparts.
   Q: How do you explain the fact it wasn't the U.S. but France  who was the first to bomb Libya? Is it simply part of the West's overall  campaign against Gaddafi's regime, or  maybe France has its own interests and accounts to  square?A: The United States is already running two wars, in Afghanistan  and Iraq. The incumbent president, Barack Obama, came to power surfing a wave of  anti-war sentiment in American society. He positioned himself as a man to  dramatically change U.S. foreign policy and withdraw the troops from Iraq. He  was awarded the Nobel Prize in anticipation of his achievements. Therefore Obama  hardly stands a chance of convincing the voters that the United States must get  involved in yet another war. According to recent polls, the majority of  Americans do not support the idea of the U.S. intervening with Libya's affairs  in any way. Voters won't forgive their president any more losses. It was no  coincidence that as soon as a report of an F-15 fighter aircraft being shot down  was released, Robert Gates hurried to make a statement that the active phase of  the operation is nearing its end. The U.S. fear getting involved in a war for  the same reason Germany had to give up aggression. They fear the public  reaction. But that seems to be of no concern to Sarkozy who was never hiding the  special nature of his relations with the United States.  While the U.S. is  biding in the shade, Sarkozy is willing to do the dirty work and take the risks  as he has nothing to lose. The French president's ratings are quite low, and he  badly needs a "little glorious victory." Neither is Sarkozy concerned with the  fact that destabilizing Libya will send off new waves of illegal immigrants  straight to France. "After us, the deluge" -- this famous French by-word aptly  characterizes the president's demeanor. Under current circumstances, it would be  appropriate to recall the events of 1956 when the U.K., France, and Israel  attacked Egypt attempting to win back the Suez Canal nationalized by Gamal Abdel  Nasser Hussein. The initiative belonged to Israel while France and the U.K  played peace-makers while breaking into Egypt's territory. The United States  stayed out of this, not wishing to mar their reputation with the Arab  world.
 
 Q: The fact that the Libyan conflict has been broken into by  the Western powers means that it's altogether a different story than that in  Tunisia or Egypt. Can we say that Libya is going through what Afghanistan and  Iraq did? Can we draw parallels between Muammar Gaddafi and, for instance,  Saddam Hussein?
   A: The recipe for intervening with internal affairs of countries in  disfavor is basically the same. The parallels with Iraq are obvious. Aggression  was preceded by a media attack whose goal was to justify the necessity to  overthrow the ruling regime. In case of Iraq, Hussein's regime was accused of  secretly developing weapons of mass destruction, and the media unrolled a  massive misinformation campaign. It only takes to recall Colin Powell flashing  photographs of Iraq's alleged secret WMD facilities and mobile laboratories to  media cameras. In case of Libya, the focus was made on "bloodthirstiness" of the  regime, and the story of dealing cruelly with peaceful protesters circled the  world. The global community was thus prepared for the news of air strikes and  bombings. As soon as it became clear that insurgents have lost the battle, the  UN Security Council was called up to pass Resolution 1973 whose ample wordings  in their essence granted freedom to the anti-Libyan coalition and resulted in  the country being bombed. On top of all the similarities with the situation in  Iraq, one more thing might get similar -- the end result. Libya may cease to  exist de facto, the way Iraq did. And both Libya and Iraq would degrade into  "black holes."
          Dedication of the Jeffrey Lucey chapter of Veterans For  Peace
 A speech by Gold Star  Mother Celeste Zappala, mother of Sgt. Sherwood Baker, KIA April 26, 2004 in  Iraq. Sad anniversaries are marked in the faces we see here tonight, this  weekend marks 8 years since the disastrous Iraq invasion, nine and a half years  ago the official chapter of the misguided war on Afghanistan began – Joyce just  told me that today is Jeffrey's 30th birthday, and my son Sherwood will always  be 30 years old.  
 Lobby Weekend in Washington, DC
 Members of MFSO traveled  to Washington DC from all over the country to participate in a weekend of  trainings and grassroots lobby visits. We delivered postcards to 80 Senators and  175 Representatives with the message "Bring our troops & tax dollars  home"  
 March 18th, 2011: Cape Cod Veterans For Peace Honors  Jeffrey Lucey
 On March 18, 2011, the  Cape Cod Chapter of Veterans for Peace will dedicate and rename our chapter in  honor of Corporal Jeffrey M. Lucey. A 23-year-old Iraq War veteran, Lucey  suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder PTSD and in his anguish took his  own life on June 22, 2004, almost a year after his discharge from active  military duty. Jeff's family home is in Belchertown, Massachusetts. His parents  have, since his death, become tireless advocates for active duty and discharged  military personnel who are experiencing this horrendous and widespread  disorder.  
 War Is NOT a Hollywood Movie: Southern California  MFSO
 March 19, 2011 - Eleven  military family members and veterans were arrested for civil trespass today in  front of Grauman's Chinese Theatre where they staged a sit in on the 8th  anniversary of the occupation of Iraq. They brought with them the photographs  and boots of soldiers who have died in Afghanistan and Iraq. The family members  brought a block of cement with them when they sat among the hand and footprints  of Hollywood legends and pressed the foot prints of an empty pair of combat  boots into the cement signing the footprints 'Forgotten Dead.' copying what the  stars do when they get their star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.    
 MFSO Member Carole Whelan Protests Senator in Maine who  Supported Iraq War
 MFSO members and other  peace activists protested Senator Susan Collins' induction into the Maine  Women's Hall of Fame Saturday in Augusta. Shortly after Senator Collins was  awarded the honor at the University of Maine campus, a woman stood up in the  audience and began speaking, reading a written statement, and saying Senator  Collins should refuse the award for her role in helping advance the war in Iraq  eight years ago. Senator Collins was among the majority in the Senate that gave  then President Bush the authorization to use force against Iraq.    
 IVAW Connects the Dots in Madison, WI
 The Iraq Veteran's  Against the War (IVAW) hosted a rally last Saturday, March 19 on the 8th  anniversary of the Iraq War. Todd E. Dennis, former nuclear machinist mate on an  attack submarine and current Madison Chapter President for the IVAW was one of  several responsible for organizing the event. The rally began at the library  mall on the campus of UW-Madison. Songs and speeches were shared as people from  all over the state assembled. The IVAW then lead a march of several thousand to  the Capitol where several speeches were given by both veterans of several wars  and union leaders of the state. Attached is a part from that day. Please take  the time to view one of the most important speeches that connects the dots  between our wars and workers rights.      
 The deadline for eligible service members, veterans and their  beneficiaries to apply for Retroactive Stop Loss Special Pay (RSLSP) has been  extended to April 8, 2011, allowing personnel more time to apply for the  benefits they've earned under the program guidelines.  The deadline extension is included in the continuing resolution  signed by President Obama Friday, providing funding for federal government  operations through April 8, 2011. Retroactive Stop Loss Special Pay was established to compensate for  the hardships military members encountered when their service was involuntarily  extended under Stop Loss Authority between Sept. 11, 2001, and Sept. 30, 2009.  Eligible members or their beneficiaries may submit a claim to their respective  military service in order to receive the benefit of $500 for each full or  partial month served in a Stop Loss status. When RSLSP began on Oct. 21, 2009, the services estimated 145,000  service members, veterans and beneficiaries were eligible for this benefit.  Because the majority of those eligible had separated from the military, the  services have engaged in extensive and persistent outreach efforts to reach them  and remind them to apply. Outreach efforts including direct mail, engaging  military and veteran service organizations, social networks and media outlets,  will continue through April 8, 2011. To apply for more information, or to gather more information on  RSLSP, including submission requirements and service-specific links, go to  http://www.defense.gov/stoploss.      American companies are finding new overseas tax havens to legally  protect some of their profits from the U.S. tax rate of 35 percent, among the  highest in the world. Lesley Stahl reports. | Watch  Video 
 One Child At A TimeWars can literally shatter children's lives  and Elissa Montanti is on a mission to make some of them whole again through a  network of volunteers. Scott Pelley follows the progress of one of them, a badly  maimed Iraqi boy. | Watch  Video
 
 The Sage of St. AnthonyTiny Catholic high school St. Anthony  in Jersey City, N.J., doesn't even have its own gym, but it has Coach Bob  Hurley, who has taken the team, now ranked number-one in the nation, to 24 state  championships. Steve Kroft reports. | Watch  Video
 
 "60 Minutes," Sunday, March 27, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.       |