Ingredients
- 1 pound boneless skinless chicken breasts, cut into bite-size pieces
- 1 can (about 14 ounces) fat-free chicken broth
- 1/4 cup hot water
- 1/2 teaspoon dried thyme
- 2 cups uncooked instant rice
- 8 ounces mushrooms, thinly sliced
- 1 can (10 3/4 ounces) 98% fat-free cream of celery soup, undiluted
- Chopped fresh parsley
Directions
Cook chicken in broth and water in 12-inch nonstick skillet until mixture comes to a full boil. Stir in thyme and rice. Place mushrooms on top. (Do not stir mushrooms into rice.) Cover skillet; turn off heat and let stand 5 minutes.
Stir in soup; cook over low heat 5 minutes or until heated through. Sprinkle with parsley.
Tip: Serve with mixed greens salad and sliced fresh strawberries.
Yield: 4 servings. Serving size: 1 1/2 cups.
Nutrition Facts Per Serving:
Calories: 277 calories, Carbohydrates: 28 g, Protein: 32 g, Fat: 4 g, Saturated Fat: 1 g, Cholesterol: 67 mg, Sodium: 774 mg, Fiber: 2 g
Calories: 277 calories, Carbohydrates: 28 g, Protein: 32 g, Fat: 4 g, Saturated Fat: 1 g, Cholesterol: 67 mg, Sodium: 774 mg, Fiber: 2 g
Exchanges per serving: 2 Bread/Starch, 3 Meat.
Since I'm trying to note diabetes at least once a week, a number of e-mails came in asking about a recipe with mushrooms noting that mushrooms are supposed to be one of the super foods good for diabetes. So there's a recipe that uses mushrooms.
Meanwhile Barry Grey (WSWS) reports some disturbing news:
The International Socialist Organization is stepping up its efforts to legitimize American imperialism’s military interventions in the Middle East in the wake of US-British-French missile strikes against Syria, the intensified offensive against Iran signaled by President Donald Trump’s pullout from the Iran nuclear agreement, and the Israeli bombardment of Iranian forces in Syria.
The ISO’s longstanding campaign for an escalation of the US-led war for regime change in Syria and a more direct confrontation with Iranian and Russian forces has closely tracked the moves by the American government. The present situation is no exception.
In recent days, Socialist Worker, the website of the ISO, has prominently featured an editorial published May 8 titled “Our socialism is international,” which concludes with an attack on opponents of the US intervention and Washington’s proxy forces in Syria, branding them apologists for the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The ISO has also reposted an article by Ashley Smith from August of 2016, at the height of the media propaganda blitz denouncing the Syrian government offensive against US-backed “rebels” in Aleppo, which makes similar arguments (see: “International Socialist Organization backs NATO escalation in Syria” )
On May 1, Socialist Worker published a commentary titled “The left can’t be silent about Assad’s crimes.” The article attacked a piece published in Jacobin under the headline “US Out of Syria.” Jacobin has adopted an eclectic position on the war, publishing articles both pro and con.
The ISO felt all the more obliged to publicly reply to this article because Jacobin is co-hosting the ISO’s “Socialism 2018” conference in Chicago in July. Jacobin’s publisher, Bhaskar Sunkara, is a former vice-chairman of the Democratic Socialists of America, with which the ISO appears to be preparing some form of political regroupment.
The ISO is concerned that politically radicalized students and youth attracted to socialism are hostile to American military interventions in Syria and elsewhere. The growth of anti-capitalist sentiment among young people coincides with a resurgence of the class struggle among teachers and other sections of workers, which is taking the form of an incipient rebellion against the corporatist trade unions.
The ISO wants to ensure that any movement that emerges is subordinated to the agencies of American imperialism such as the unions, the Democratic Party and the State Department.
I've had it with those advocating for war and more war. I'm just sick of them and the way they destroy our world and so many people in it.
This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Tuesday:
Tuesday, May 15, 2018. All the votes have still not been counted and
released but it appears that Moqtada al-Sadr has maintained his lead.
Saturday, Iraq held elections and terms like "shocking" have been tossed around ever since. Simon Tisdall (GUARDIAN) explains:
The unexpectedly poor showing of Haider al-Abadi, Iraq’s prime minister, in parliamentary elections has dealt a blow to US influence in the country. It was a poor return for American backing for the Baghdad government’s drive to extirpate Islamic State and regain lost territory.
But the bigger loser may be Iran, whose allies in Iraq’s Shia militias known as the Popular Mobilisation Forces were pushed into second place by Moqtada al-Sadr, the veteran nationalist. Put simply, Sadr believes Iraqis should run Iraqi affairs – not Washington, not Tehran and not their proxies.
Saturday, Iraq held elections and terms like "shocking" have been tossed around ever since. Simon Tisdall (GUARDIAN) explains:
The unexpectedly poor showing of Haider al-Abadi, Iraq’s prime minister, in parliamentary elections has dealt a blow to US influence in the country. It was a poor return for American backing for the Baghdad government’s drive to extirpate Islamic State and regain lost territory.
But the bigger loser may be Iran, whose allies in Iraq’s Shia militias known as the Popular Mobilisation Forces were pushed into second place by Moqtada al-Sadr, the veteran nationalist. Put simply, Sadr believes Iraqis should run Iraqi affairs – not Washington, not Tehran and not their proxies.
#Iraq Elections Results so far:
•Muqatada Sadr 54
•PMF 44
•Abadi 39
•Maliki 25
•Allawi 22
Absentee, military, displaced votes, not out yet. In another hour
So far? Elections were Saturday. Sunday was one day after, Monday was two days after and today is three days after. Remember the hype that the electronic machines used in the voting would mean that the results were known in two days. Tom Barnes (INDEPENDENT) notes, "The country's electoral commission released results for 10 of the 19 provinces on Sunday evening, but has given no indication as to when more returns would be announced."
And after Moqtada, who came in second? CBS and AP note:
An alliance of candidates linked to Iraq's powerful Shiite paramilitary groups was in second. The alliance is headed by Hadi al-Amiri, a former minister of transport with close ties to Iran who became a senior commander of paramilitary fighters in the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) extremist group.
From last night's THE NEWSHOUR (PBS):
Nick Schifrin:
In second place, the Iranian-backed Hadi Al-Amiri, and in third place, the U.S.-backed current Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi. In a national address, Al-Abadi called on Iraqis to respect the results.
In second place, the Iranian-backed Hadi Al-Amiri, and in third place, the U.S.-backed current Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi. In a national address, Al-Abadi called on Iraqis to respect the results.
Haider Al-Abadi (through translator):
We are ready to work and cooperate on forming the strongest government for Iraq, free of corruption, hateful confessionalism and unsubjected to a foreign agenda, a government which is capable of preventing a return of terrorism and keeping the country away from sliding into marginal conflicts.
We are ready to work and cooperate on forming the strongest government for Iraq, free of corruption, hateful confessionalism and unsubjected to a foreign agenda, a government which is capable of preventing a return of terrorism and keeping the country away from sliding into marginal conflicts.
Nick Schifrin:
For four years, Iraq’s been fighting ISIS, but the vote was remarkably peaceful, and defined by bread and butter issues. Iraqi unemployment is soaring.
The country needs $80 billion of reconstruction. Two million, mostly Sunnis, are displaced. But turnout was low, and skepticism high. Some Baghdad residents are skeptical this political upset can upset a corrupt system.
For four years, Iraq’s been fighting ISIS, but the vote was remarkably peaceful, and defined by bread and butter issues. Iraqi unemployment is soaring.
The country needs $80 billion of reconstruction. Two million, mostly Sunnis, are displaced. But turnout was low, and skepticism high. Some Baghdad residents are skeptical this political upset can upset a corrupt system.
Iraqi families are at the heart of building an inclusive & peaceful Iraq #InternationalDayofFamilies
What does the future hold? No one knows but many are guessing.
Abadi will likely lose leadership of his own party to Maleki, then all three of top leaders (Sadr, Amiri and Maleki) would be opposed to US presence to #Iraq
Nouri al-Maliki in control of the party? That would be Dawa. And without being prime minister, what is his power base? Ibrahim al-Jaafari and Nouri have often been in conflict and al-Jaafari has a real power base. Nouri's base is rather small since he was ousted as prime minister back in 2014. Don't forget the the whisper promises his lackeys had to resort to -- Nouri doesn't want to be prime minister again! -- ahead of the elections as they attempted to gain votes.
Again, al-Jaafari has a base. With Nouri and his history of corruption and abuse, you sort of get the idea he could be knifed in Tahrir Square and no one would seriously pursue an investigation into the crime.
That doesn't mean Nouri couldn't be in charge of Dawa again -- it just means a lot of things would have to break his way.
What is known is that Nouri has no fixed position. He will sell out any belief of any person (remember his own spokesperson who fled the country after Nouri blamed him for the corrupt Russian deal?). So the notion that Nouri is anti-American overlooks the reality that (a) he's partnered with the US many times and (b) play on his paranoia or offer him money and he'll do whatever he's told to do.
Shia leader Muqtada al-Sadr alliance set to win Iraq's elections in remarkable comeback aje.io/my2y2
Based upon what is known Moqtada's followers are celebrating.
Supporters of Muqtada Sadr in Baghdad celebrating his coalition's victory in #Iraq's recent elections and seen here chanting:
"Iran, out, out (Iran get lost), Baghdad forever free"
#Iran
#IraqElections2018
James Cogan (WSWS) offers his analysis of the results which includes the following:
The largest bloc in the parliament, with 54 seats, will be the “Alliance of Revolutionaries for Reform.” This highly unstable grouping is led by the Sadrist movement that follows bourgeois nationalist cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and the Stalinist Iraqi Communist Party (CP). It won solid support in the working-class suburbs and slums of Baghdad and other major cities.
The bloc is wracked by contradictions. The Iraqi CP, in line with its history of collaboration with imperialism, fully supported the 2003 US invasion and occupation. Sadr’s movement, which has its main base of support in the poorest working-class areas of Baghdad, initially opposed it. In 2004, Sadr called for armed resistance and his Mahdi Army suffered heavy losses in pitched battles with American and British forces in Baghdad, Basra, Najaf, Karbala, and other cities in the majority Shiite provinces of Iraq.
Sadr continued to verbally oppose the US occupation on Iraqi nationalist grounds but his movement turned to sectarian violence against Sunni-based forces in 2006. The Mahdi Army was blamed for some of the worst atrocities that forced a large proportion of the Sunni population of Baghdad to flee their homes into segregated cantons. After 2007, the Sadrists largely called off resistance and joined the jockeying for parliamentary power, including by taking ministries in the Shiite-dominated occupation governments at various times.
Sadr formed the alliance with the CP in 2016, based on seeking increased positions and privilege through common denunciations of the appalling poverty that faces the working class. Under conditions of growing US-Iranian tensions, Sadr also ramped up nationalist condemnations of Iran’s influence over the Shiite parties of Iraq, accusing Tehran of seeking to take over the country and its resources.
Outgoing Prime Minister Abadi has indicated he is prepared to hold talks with the Sadrist bloc over the formation of a new regime. Fatah, however, has said it opposes any role in the government for parties like the CP that advance a nominally secular perspective. This stance appears to be intended more to pressure Abadi and other political groupings to exclude the Sadrists and their anti-Iranian position.
It is entirely conceivable that US agencies will respond by encouraging a bloc between Abadi, Maliki and the Sadrists. While Sadr is presented in the establishment media as “anti-American,” he has demonstrated in the past his willingness to collaborate with the US to protect or advance the interests of the layer of the Shiite elite that he represents.
The following community sites -- plus BLACK AGENDA REPORT -- updated:
Margot Kidder
6 hours ago
Lock Gina Haspel up
6 hours ago
Go away Mueller
7 hours ago
A War Criminal passes away
7 hours ago
Carly and Cat
7 hours ago
