1 pound boneless skinless chicken breasts, cut into bite-size chunks
salt and pepper
2 (10.5 ounce) cans cream of chicken soup
½ cup milk
1 (6 ounce) box chicken flavored stuffing mix
1 ½ cups chicken broth
Instructions
Preheat oven to 375F. Spray a 9x13-inch baking dish with oil.
In a mixing bowl, whisk together soups and milk. Set aside.
Place
chicken into the prepared baking dish. Sprinkle with salt and pepper
and stir to make sure each piece is seasoned. Make sure the chicken is
in a single layer.
Spread the soup mixture over the chicken, making sure all the chicken is covered.
Sprinkle the stuffing mix over the soup mixture.
Slowly drizzle the chicken broth over the stuffing, making sure it all gets moistened.
Cover
tightly with aluminum foil and bake for 30 minutes. Remove foil and
bake an additional 15 minutes, until casserole is bubbly and stuffing is
browned.
Serve hot.
That's a good recipe and I love it when a casserole recipe brings together popular ingredients -- chicken and stuffing. I've got one of my own where I do a casserole with summer sausage, celery and stuffing.
A
federal judge has issued a nationwide block on a Trump administration
directive that prevented children in the U.S. illegally from enrolling
in Head Start, a federally funded preschool program.
Head
Start associations in several states filed suit against the policy
change by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The ruling
by a federal judge in Washington state on Thursday comes after a
coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general succeeded in temporarily
halting the policy’s implementation within their own states.
With the new ruling, the policy is now on hold across the country.
Thank
goodness it's on hold. We should work to educate all children. Period. The child
is in the US. Why are you penalizing the child? I don't have time for
these anti-Christians who pose as Christians. These Christian
Nationalists who would spit on Jesus if he appeared before them.
I'm for immigration. But even if someone isn't, why would you blame a child? Why would you look to penalize a child?
Don't ever take that position and try to pretend you're a Christian because I'll tell you right now that you aren't/
Thursday, September 11, 2025. Chump assaults Chicago while rewarding
his crooked buddies (Ghislaine Maxwell, the man he let out of prison in
2021 whose now been arrested five more times), you got the wrong site if
you think we're going to join in the media-imposed national mourning of
a hate monger, and much more.
Let's start with a passing.
The actress Polly Holliday has passed away. As Marcia noted, "You can't talk about US television in the 70s without
noting Polly Holiday and her character Flo. Good hearted, kind and
living life on her own terms, Flo was a breakthrough character." And Stan agreed adding, "If you watched TV in the seventies, you knew Polly Holiday's Flo. Flo
was an iconic TV character of the 70s like HAPPY DAYS' Fonzie, THE MARY
TYLER MOORE SHOW's Mary, DIFFR'NT STROKES' Arnold, etc. "
Flo
was not the beginning and ending of Polly's career. She gave strong
performances throughout her career -- won Golden Globes, was nominated
for an Emmy and a Tony. But Flo really did capture something -- joy.
Along with the TV and film roles many in the press are covering, she was
often instrumental behind the scenes of many other projects. I see
press noting that Dustin Hoffman (her lifelong friend, by the way, the
press might try noting that) directed her early in the 70s and got her
cast in ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN. One of the projects Polly did not
appear in but had a real impact on behind the scenes was Dustin
Hoffman's TOOTSIE.
There are
so many in front of microphones preaching hate on this group or that
group. Flo was about joy. And America embraced the character for that
reason. When someone had brought joy and uplifted us, helped us laugh
at ourselves and embrace ourselves, their passing is always
significant.
We don't note every death. We don't have time. And, as Ann pointed out in "Not a sad moment for me"
last night, we're not going to play the White game. You trash our
race, we're not going to pretend to shed tears over your death. You
trash women, we're not going to pretend. You trash the LGBTQ+
community, we're not going to pretend. Hate merchants are cheap and all
around.
If you go CBS NEWS' YOUTUBE page
right now, you will find 35 videos they've posted in less than 17 hours
on the passing of a hate merchant who preached hate towards African
Americans, hate towards women who lived equality and hate towards the
LGBTQ+ community.
And how many videos noting Polly Holliday's passing?
She
was one of the main reasons ALICE was a hit show. Four years she
played FLO on that CBS show. She played the character two more years on
the spin-off FLO. Her work in that role brought the CBS network
prestige with her Golden Globes as well a with her Emmy nominations.
And not one video report on her passing posted to the CBS NEWS YOUTUBE
page. That's outrageous.
But 35 on a hate monger.
Ann
made it quite clear and speaks for many of us: We're adults, we can
handle ourselves. But racists make the country much worse for our
children. We're not going to tolerate that and we're not going to ever
pretend that someone who publicly hated us and attacked us is someone
whose passing has upset us.
I would argue that
the media coverage -- which does include MSNBC's firing of Matthew Dowd
-- is racist. The White-led news doesn't get it because they're White.
So they think they can chuckle over what the hate monger did and made
his life about. It was never threatening to them.
I
do not have time to go through every video I post at this site
throughout the day. But if it's a video about the hate monger and it's
not him being called out for his racism, it's not going up here. As a
Black woman, I'm not glorifying him. And I'm certainly not mourning
him. My thoughts and prayers go out to the Black children whose life is
harder because of him, to the LGBTQ+ children who suffer because of his
words and actions, to the girls and young women he led attacks on.
Flo
said, "Kiss my grits." To those trying to force us to mourn the
passing of an avowed racist -- and homophobe and misogynist -- I say,
"Kiss my Black ass."
Let's move over to immigration. Yesterday on MEIDASTOUCH NEWS, Ben addressed Chump's gestapo police.
They
shove, they attack citizens. I have noted for months now that these
people will destroy their own lives in the coming years, they'll turn to
booze and drugs to self-medicate or they'll take their own lives out of
guilt over the families they've broken up and the lives they've
destroyed. That
said, I didn't include the asshole factor. Not only will the coming
years find them ashamed of their actions, it's also going to find them
disgraced and others attacking them. If they're lucky, a decade from
now they'll just get their house tee-peed. But it could be much worse
because they are breaking the law and they are being violent. That has a
way of coming back on you.
Will
the big money they make right now at this moment still seem worth it
five or so years from now when the country and the government turn
against them?
Now let's be
honest about what we saw in the video Ben played. With regards to the
US citizen who is a Latino-American? He was shoved. And ICE can -- and
did -- lie but we saw what happened. And it was not because he wasn't
cooperating. He was being questioned by a man in front of him and he
was answering the question.
The ICE thug shoved the man to try to get him on an assault charge.
That's
what these pathetic cowards do. Over and over. They shove people. And
then they whine assault. It's a gestapo tactic and that they use it --
and do so while people are recording -- demonstrates that they are human
garbage.
They've not been properly trained and there is no real oversight.
Especially
when it comes to our former Supreme Court which has now become The
Crooked Court as Betty regularly notes. The lack of oversight and the
inability to follow existing laws that we see in the videos Ben reported
on above? Time to bring in The Crooked Court. John Fritze (CNN) reports:
Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s breezy suggestion this week that Americans who are roughed up by ICE
can sue agents in federal court is drawing pushback from civil rights
attorneys who note the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has in
recent years made those cases nearly impossible to win.
Writing to explain the court’s emergency ruling
Monday that allowed the Trump administration to continue “roving”
immigration patrols in Southern California, Kavanaugh brushed aside
concerns that masked ICE agents had pushed, shoved and detained
Hispanics – in one instance throwing a US citizen against a fence and
confiscating his phone.
“To the extent that
excessive force has been used,” Kavanaugh wrote in a 10-page
concurrence, “the Fourth Amendment prohibits such action, and remedies
should be available in federal court.”
But in a
series of recent decisions – including two that involved incidents at
the border – the Supreme Court has severely limited the ability of
people to sue federal law enforcement officers for excessive force
claims. Kavanaugh, who was nominated to the court by Trump during his
first term, was in the majority in those decisions.
“It’s
bordering on impossible to get any sort of remedy in a federal court
when a federal officer violates federal rights,” said Patrick Jaicomo, a
senior attorney at the libertarian Institute for Justice who has
regularly represented clients suing federal agents.
Lauren
Bonds, executive director of the National Police Accountability
Project, said that it can be incredibly difficult for a person subjected
to excessive force to find an attorney and take on the federal
government in court.
“What we’ve seen is, term
after term, the court limiting the avenues that people have available to
sue the federal government,” Bonds told CNN.
So
I've long cautioned the thugs about the internal threats they face in
the future -- threats coming from their own hearts and minds. And
today, we added being known years from now as the gestapo throughout the
neighborhood you live in. But there's another. And that's the law.
While Chump and crooked court may have thwarted rule of law at present,
that can change at any time. So toss that in your risk pool -- you may,
at a later date, be made to pay legally for every law you are now
breaking.
For
more than 15 years, before they conducted any operation to arrest an
immigrant in the United States, officers with Immigration and Customs
Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations division have been
required to fill out a form with details about their target — name,
appearance, known addresses and employment, immigration history, any
criminal history and more — and give it to a supervisor for approval.
This
year, in a sign of how the agency has moved from targeted enforcement
to broad street sweeps under the Trump administration, that policy has
been ended, six current and former officials and agents of ICE and the
Department of Homeland Security told NBC News.
“It’s hard to fill out a worksheet that just says, ‘Meet in the Home Depot parking lot,’” one of the former ICE officials said.
The
policy shift sheds light on the way ICE is now operating ahead of
anticipated immigration crackdowns in Chicago and Boston, and it helps
explain the seemingly spontaneous nature of recent arrests in Los
Angeles and Washington, D.C.
Both Darius
Reeves, the former director of ICE’s Baltimore field office, and two
former officials with DHS, under which ICE falls, said the form, known
as a field operations worksheet, had been required for nearly every
arrest the division made. The only exceptions, they said, were instances
in which ICE was called out to assist local law enforcement agencies.
The
exact date of the change is unclear, but it happened before this
summer. Reeves, who left ICE in May, said that he was made aware of it
before he left and that it was communicated down from DHS leadership.
The decision was made because of a perception that the worksheet is “a
waste of time,” he said, but he said he believes it is actually “a very
valuable necessity” now “bypassed … so they could keep constantly
flooding the streets” with officers. Reeves said that, even though the
worksheets are no longer mandatory, he knows some officers are still
using them out of concern for future legal liability.
They're wise to be concerned. Much wiser than the thugs hired on under Chump.
About 872,000 immigrants live in Virginia, according to federal and independent estimates. More than 6% of the state’s population are temporary workers and immigrants
– lawful permanent residents, nonimmigrants, asylees and refugees – a
population that has remained largely the same in the decade. Another 3.7% of the state's population is undocumented immigrants, according to a 2023 Pew Research Center estimate.
The
Trump Administration says it is an ICE operation targeting the worst of
the worst. But immigrant advocates say this more of an attack on the
immigrant community as a whole and the parade will go on as planned.
"We
noticed that Monday and Tuesday phones are ringing off the hook, and so
they Monday especially was our busiest day since January," Andre
Gordillo, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights said.
Those
at the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights have been
prepped and ready for the anticipated surge of ICE agents in Chicago
this week. They've been handing out info cards, as advocates are uniting
to help keep families safe.
"What he's trying to sow is divide, but he's actually sowed unity in our great city," 22nd Ward Alderman Michael Rodriguez said.
We
do get how evil Donald Chump is, right? He was evil before his first
term.
But he gets increasingly evil and disgusting with each year he racks
up. That's probably why his skin is rotting. You know his insides are
rotting. And should be. He's named this assault on Chicago "Operation
Midway Blitz." Seemed a strange name even for Chump. Blitz:
A
blitz is a sudden, intensive attack or effort, originating from the
German term Blitzkrieg (meaning "lightning war") [. . .] in any context,
it means a swift, overwhelming, and often unexpected attack or
concentrated effort, such as in the heavy bombing of London during World
War II, known as The Blitz.
DHS
claims the operation will "target the criminal illegal aliens who
flocked to Chicago and Illinois," blaming the city and state's sanctuary
laws that prohibit local and state law enforcement from cooperating
with ICE agents.
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson
said the city received "no notice of any enhanced immigration action"
ahead of the operation. Gov. JB Pritzker posted on X.com, "Once again,
this isn't about fighting crime. That requires support and coordination —
yet we've experienced nothing like that over the past several weeks."
Mayor Brandon Johnson announced last week that Chicago is expanding its "Know Your Rights" and "Family Preparedness" campaigns.
"My
administration will not allow our communities to be consumed by fear
and uncertainty. We will continue to provide updated information so that
all of the families of Chicago are prepared," Johnson said in a
statement.
The initiatives include printable
and fillable preparedness packets, infographics and guides with trusted
resources and community contacts, and weekly workshops to help families
create safety and communication plans. The city also launched an upgraded immigrant and refugee rights website.
I
guess it's being so butt ugly that makes Homeland Security's Assistant
Secretary Tricia
McLaughlin so nasty -- look at the forehead -- that's not a human
being, she's been bred with something else -- not even Christine
Baranski's nose-forehead region is as disturbing and that's really
saying something. As Paul Rudnick has observed, "Tricia
McLaughlin, a whiny Assistant Secretary at DHS, is the latest member of
the vicious L'Oreal-13 gang. She says white Afrikaners suffer more
discrimination than anyone. Tricia's what happens when you cross Kristi Noem with a rabid pekingese"
So Tricia -- who needs to choose a more natural hair color -- attacks
Illinois Governor JD Pritzker in a press release that we're not going to
quote. We're only noting because they sent it to the public e-mail
account and because it ticked me off. I know JD and have for years.
Their attack just goes to how scared they are of him. And they should
be. He's got a spine which is something no one serving in the current
administration has.
McLaughlin wants the country to know that JB is responsible for criminals being on the street.
You know what, I think I'm going to have to agree with you and call JB out for putting Jonathan
Braun on the streets -- Oh wait. Tits, that was your boss Donald
Chump. Kat wrote about this last night in "Chump sprung him from prison and he's been arrested five time since" -- Chump gave him clemency in
January 2021 right before he left office. 220,000 pounds of
marijuana is what the drug dealer was caught with. That's what he was
convicted of. Chump put him back on the streets (he's tight with
son-in-law Jared) and since then? Five arrests.
Five arrests.
Most recently for attacking a nurse.
The
danger to this country is not JB, it's Donald Chump -- you know, the
convicted felon. The man Ivana said raped her. The man accused by
multiple women of assault. The man whose best friend was a convicted sex
trafficker. The man who's terrorizing the residents of Chicago right now.
“People
are, frankly, afraid. People are afraid to come out of their homes.
They’re afraid to go shopping. They’re afraid to take their own children
to school because they have mixed-status households,” Pritzker said on a
visit to Pilsen Tuesday.
[. . .]
Trump
and his administration has singled out Chicago among a short-list of
Democrat-led cities to be painted as crime-ridden and in need of
intervention. Yet Chicago is actually leading a national downward turn
in violent crime, according to experts who study crime statistics. And
there is no evidence to support undocumented immigrants are responsible
for an outsized share of violent crime, according to the Gun Violence
Data Hub.
“Donald Trump likes to talk about
immigrants as criminals. These are not criminals. These are people who
are genuinely here in this country, holding down jobs. They’ve been here
for 10, 20 or 30 years. Raising families here. Paying taxes. Following
the law. Doing the right thing,” Pritzker said.
Sew,
divide and destroy is what he's up to. And he's assaulting people in
every city he can (well, he's avoiding one state and it's not a red
state but none of us are supposed to notice that -- or comment on itI
may make time to do so tomorrow). Gino Fanelli (WXXI) reports on New York state:
Federal
immigration agents were seemingly forced to retreat from a roofing job
site Tuesday in the Park Avenue neighborhood after being confronted by
more than 100 protesters.
The group shouted
“shame” and "Gestapo,” and applauded as agents in the ICE-led action
drove a Border Patrol SUV away on four flat tires, which had been
slashed.
One of the roofers was taken into
custody, but agents left others apparently unchecked on the rooftop of
the Westminster Road rental house.
Confrontations
between immigration agents and protestors have been escalating across
the country, leading the Trump administration to deploy National Guard
troops to cities like Los Angeles and elsewhere. Last week, The New York
Times reported on an expected surge in enforcement, and that Trump
officials had hinted of plans for a "crack down on so-called sanctuary
cities," which prohibit local law enforcement from assisting in federal
immigration enforcement.
Roofing contractor
Clayton Baker identified the man taken into custody by ICE as “Chino,”
one of his employees. Baker said the man has been in the United States
for about 25 years and had legal documentation to work.
“They
took my best worker that's been working with me for 5 years, and just
basically, ‘See you later,’ you know?” Baker said. “He's a family guy,
and he's got a baby on the way. He's never even had a speeding ticket
that I know of. He goes to church every Sunday, and he pays his taxes.
“But you want to come get him off of a hard-working job,” Baker continued. “It's bulls--t, and it's inhumane and it's sad.”
Support from the Western New York Coalition of Farmworker Serving Agencies
allowed two immigrants to be spared -- ICE high tailed it once the
coalition made it clear that they weren't leaving and that more
immigrant supporters were due to arrive. On their home page, they quote
the late Civil Rights activist Cesar Chavez, "It is ironic that those
who till the soil, cultivate and harvest the fruits, vegetables and
their foods that fill you tables with abundance have nothing left for
themselves."
Cordova
-- who was not charged with any other crime and Smith noted has no past
criminal record -- was to be placed directly into the custody of the
federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, or ICE.
On Tuesday, the judge spent several minutes reading aloud portions of letters submitted to the court in support of Cordova.
The
fear and anxiety that swelled within the Brazilian population on the
Island after masked federal agents raided Martha’s Vineyard last spring
is on the rise again, this time following statements from federal
immigration officials that they are targeting Massachusetts a second
time to deport immigrants. There are also reports that enrollment of new
immigrant students on Island is down this school year.
As
has been widely reported by the New York Times and the Boston Globe,
acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement director Todd Lyons announced
“Patriot 2.0” on Saturday, which is expected to last the next several
weeks. It’s unclear how many people ICE would attempt to apprehend or
whom, nor have there been indications that the Island would be targeted.
But it’s having an impact locally.
“People
are getting scared again.” said Ricardo Duarte, pastor at Lagoinha
Martha’s Vineyard Church, on Tuesday. “Every move [ICE] makes, it’s an
emotional roller coaster.”
[. . .]
Duarte
said that about 30 percent of his congregation stopped attending
services after the ICE raids last spring, but families were starting to
trickle back to services over the summer. He worries that with the
recent rumors and statements from top federal officials, many will again
stay home with more frequency. Even smaller gatherings at individual
homes, he said, some have feared attending.
“They
don’t know what to do, because we don’t know what ICE is going to do,”
Duarte said, noting that he has struggled with what to tell his
congregants. “They said they were going after criminals last time, but
this is not what happened.” Duarte referred to the statement from ICE
officials in May that they would be targeting immigrants with criminal
backgrounds, but reporting by The MV Times indicates that several of
those detained did not have criminal backgrounds; Duarte said that his
congregation also helped the family of a man that was detained who did
not have a criminal history.
I'm
an electrical worker in IBEW Local 553 in Durham, North Carolina. We're
one of the fastest growing locals in the South, with members in both
construction and utility line work.
Last month,
I worked with a group of members to organize an immigrant defense
training at our union hall, after persuading our officers to approve it.
We worked with local immigrant organization Siembra NC to lead it. We
had about twenty people there, half IBEW members and half from other
organizations. Everybody agreed it was very useful.
Siembra
NC combined two trainings into one. One was ICE verification: training
people to show up when they hear reports of ICE, and send out a
confirmation or an “all clear” to a local network. People are very
scared and can think it’s ICE when it’s not. Unverified rumors can
quickly spread and stoke terror in immigrant communities. Building an
ICE verification network helps get information out when ICE is
conducting a raid, and prevents alarmism when it's not.
The
second part was “4th Amendment workplaces” training about how to make
your workplace a little safer. Even small changes can make a big
difference: making sure your doors and gates say “employees only” or
“restricted area” can keep ICE from barging in. We have a goal to push
our employer to implement these changes. We also got trained to ask for a
warrant, and to record agents.
We also talked
about other things we can do. Having established safety practices can
add a layer of protection in the event of a worksite ICE raid. Since PPE
is a requirement on jobsites, if agents show up, we can say, “Hey, we
need to get you a hard hat and glasses -- this is a restricted area".
We
need a restricted area for those who traffick children. We're supposed
to have that in the US. A Ghislaine Maxwell gets convicted for her
pedophile exploits and is sentenced to prison for 20 years only to be
moved by her friend Donald Chump to a minimum security facility.
She's a pedophile who trafficked girls and women. But there's justice
and then there's Chump justice.
Ghislane
Maxwell’s former lawyer just admitted what we all suspected: The sexual
abuser and Epstein accomplice was transferred to a nicer,
minimum-security prison so that she could give the Trump administration
something in exchange -- like a favorable testimony.
Arthur
Aidala, who represented Maxwell in her 2022 sex-trafficking trial and
appeals, appeared on CNN on Monday to talk about the case.
“The
deputy attorney general met with Ghislaine, and then she was shortly
thereafter moved to a cushier prison,” CNN’s Abby Phillips asked Aidala,
who has also represented Alan Dershowitz, Harvey Weinstein, and Rudy
Giuliani. “Why?”
“Well, there are things I’m
not allowed to talk about, right?” Aidala replied, stumbling over his
words. “So there are things I can’t talk about.”
“Let’s just—” Phillips attempted to interject.
“Obviously
I can talk in generalities,” Aidala continued. “Anybody who’s
represented by a lawyer who knows what they’re doing, [and who] goes in
and meets with the government … there’s always a quid pro quo.… Anytime
the government wants information from a citizen, the citizen says,
‘Well, I have a right to remain silent. If you want me to give up that
right, I need something in return.’ Usually, it’s a plea bargain.
Usually, your charges are going to be lowered, and your exposure.”
Former Biden adviser Neera Tanden, who was present, started laughing at Aidala.
“Why are you laughing?” he said. “I’ve done that for 35 years!”
“Because you just admitted to a quid pro quo with the Trump administration!”
“That’s how the whole system works! The whole system works on quid pro quo.”
So
a deal was made before a word was spoken? And somehow the White House
didn't feel the deal needed to be released to the American public or
even acknowledged? Who works for who? Can someone help me out with
that because I love the United States and was raised to believe that our
government works for us. Not the other way around. So when Chump
makes a deal with a convicted pedophile and sex trafficker and does so
as a public servant, he's not only on the clock, he's working for us and
we have the right to know what Maxwell gave and was required to give in
order for him to move her to a prison that she did not qualify for.
He's put her in a low level prison and she's a convicted sex offender.
People in Bryan have not just complained, they have actively protested
her being at Camp Fed and arguing that her presence is a threat to their
neighborhood.
They're right too. That's why sex offenders like Maxwell are not supposed to be in these prisons.
Donald
made a deal and fat boy works for us, not the other way around. It's
past time to remind him of that and Congress needs to demand that the
Justice Dept release every bit of paperwork they have on Maxwell's deal
that resulted in a prison transfer.
We deserve to know.
What
we do know? Just like he let a drug dealer out of prison because he
was friends with his son-in-law, Chump let Ghislaine skip off to Club
Fed. The only one Chmp always protects is himself. Exactly what does
Ghislaine Maxwell have on him?
It
took Trump chronicler Maggie Haberman to cut to the chase: if Trump
didn’t sign the birthday card or other documents released by Jeffrey
Epstein’s estate, the reporter asked in a quiet yet insistent tone,
what’s the working theory as to why he’s in there?
“The
president has one of the most famous signatures in the world,” Karoline
Leavitt, the White House press secretary, replied on Tuesday. “The
president did not write that letter. He did not sign those documents.”
Leavitt
will have to do better than that. The typewritten message inserted into
the sketched outline of a nude woman looks like compelling evidence of a
close – and laddish – relationship between the US president and the
world’s most notorious paedophile sex trafficker.
Tuesday’s
press briefing at the White House was the latest demonstration of how
the Epstein files are the scandal that refuses to die. Leavitt threw
Roman candles, Catherine wheels and smoke bombs in the air in the hope
of distracting reporters. But she was unable to quash the nagging
suspicion that Donald Trump has something to hide.
Typically
full of brio and swagger, the White House is scrambling this time
because Trump is behaving so out of character. For years, he has
inverted the politician’s playbook by saying the quiet part out loud and
flaunting misconduct in public. When, in a 2016 presidential debate,
Hillary Clinton accused him of dodging taxes, Trump retorted: “That
makes me smart.”
But now, he is acting like the
thing he always scorned: a typical politician. Watergate was lethal to
Richard Nixon because of the cover-up and reporters chipping away to
gather precious information. British deputy prime minister Angela Rayner
spent more than a year fending off rightwing press scrutiny of her
finances before being forced to quit last week over underpaid tax on a
flat.
The Trump of old would have done the
opposite and released all the Epstein files, as he promised during the
election campaign, even if they were personally incriminating. Better to
brazen it out, lie about it and deploy some whataboutism than prolong
the stench of secrecy.
Instead, he has berated
reporters for harping on the subject. On Tuesday the man who usually has
a comment on everything told NBC News: “I don’t comment on something
that’s a dead issue.”
An
Epstein survivor who voted for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential
election has spoken out about his administration’s two biggest mistakes
in the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case.
Haley
Robson, who was abused by the pedophile financier when she was 16 years
old, told CNN’s Erin Burnett that the president’s first mistake was
”assuming you knew your voters,” and that his second mistake was what
he’s doing now: “doubl[ing] down on what you said about it being a
hoax.”
“I‘m not coming with hostility. I‘m not
angry. I‘m exhausted. I‘m tired. I am disgusted. I am not even coming
from a place of anger,” Robson continued.
“I‘m just
coming from a place of, how can we move on when the leader of the free
world keeps calling this a hoax, when indeed it is not a hoax? And then
it‘s just kind of this feeling of, like, you‘re throwing everything at
the wall to let it stick. And now it‘s, you‘re an FBI informant, and now
you‘re not an FBI informant. It‘s back to being a hoax.”
Veteran
journalist, opinion columnist and author Mona Charen, now 68, spent
much of her writing career attacking liberals and progressives. But
these days, Charen — who worked in the Reagan White House as a
speechwriter for First Lady Nancy Reagan during the 1980s — is a Never
Trump conservative, a blistering critic of the MAGA movement and an
unlikely ally of Democrats.
"At the heart of
the case for Trump has always been the notion that, sure, he's rough
around the edges, but we have to put aside our piddling character
concerns and just be glad that he is so strong, because the left
presents such an existential threat to America that we cannot survive
without Trump," Charen explains. "It was always the Flight 93 election.
When you are drowning, you don't question whether the man throwing you a
life preserver is a decent person or not — you're just grateful he's
there."
Trump and his
allies, including White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, continue
to insist that Democrats and Never Trump conservatives are promoting a
"hoax" when they call for the release of the U.S. Department of
Justice's (DOJ) files on the late billionaire financier and convicted
sex offender Epstein. And that dismissive attitude, Charen emphasizes,
is totally at odds with pro-MAGA arguments.
"They
knew Trump was a louse," Charen says of MAGA apologists. "They knew he
lied, betrayed his business partners and his wives, spread false rumors,
played dirty, and did it all without a flicker of conscience. When
Trump's character was raised as an issue by opponents, the knee-jerk
MAGA response was not to defend him, not really, but to stress the
enormity of the Democrats. This carried them through Trump's escalation
of offenses — from bullying and lying to inciting a rebellion, to
standing by while a murderous mob hunted his opponents, including his
vice president, to the machine-gun fire he's now spraying at our
institutions. We need a tough guy, they say, because the Democrats are
so dangerous."
Charen continues, "But now, they
find themselves defending Trump against the one sin that has given
their movement its chief moral stature: child abuse. It was QAnon,
Pizzagate, and other iterations of the vast child abuse conspiracy that
reassured MAGA that no matter what Trump did, the other side was always
worse — thus the obsessive focus on Jeffrey Epstein."
Warren: “I think it is wrong
for the Trump administration to be handing out literally tens of
billions of dollars to these giant profitable corporations. And you will
be in a position to get them even more.”
Washington, D.C. — At a hearing of the Senate
Finance Committee, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) questioned
Mr. Donald Korb, nominee for Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), about his views on the billions of dollars in retroactive
tax breaks that Republicans are giving through the “Big, Beautiful
Bill” to large corporations for research and development that they’ve
already done.
In response to a letter from Senator Warren, the nonpartisan Joint
Committee on Taxation (JCT) revealed in August that President Trump’s
“Big, Beautiful Bill” will deliver $67 billion in retroactive research
and development tax breaks to corporations in 2026.
Senator Warren challenged Mr. Korb to explain how these tax breaks
lower costs for American families. Mr. Korb repeatedly dodged the
senator’s questions, saying that “Congress [] is responsible for
enacting the tax law,” and that he is “not drilled down on what is in
this bill.”
Trump's “Big Beautiful Bill” is also massively driving down tax
liabilities for large corporations. Senator Warren asked Mr. Korb to
commit not to write new rules that let these giant corporations out of
paying the corporate alternative minimum tax, which prevents billionaire
corporations from reducing their tax liability below 15 percent of
their book income. Mr. Korb “commit[ed] to follow the law that you as
the Congress enacted in writing the regulations.”
“I think it is wrong for the Trump administration to be handing out
literally tens of billions of dollars to these giant profitable
corporations. And you will be in a position to get them even more…I want
to hear that we’re going to hold people at least to what the law
specifically requires of them, even if they are billionaire
corporations,” concluded Senator Warren.
Mr. Korb is a former IRS Chief Counsel under President Bush and, up
until recently, represented Fortune 500 companies in tax disputes with
the IRS. As Chief Counsel, his work could directly affect his former
clients’ bottom lines. Senator Warren recently urged him to address
these ethics conflicts by recusing himself from his former clients’
matters, committing to not seek employment with companies that interact
with him as IRS Chief Counsel after his government tenure, and agreeing
to not serve as a lobbyist for at least four years after his time in
government.
Transcript: Hearing to Consider the Nomination of Honorable Donald Korb, of Ohio, to be Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service Senate Finance Committee September 10, 2025
Senator Elizabeth Warren: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Donald Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ raises costs for families all across
this country while handing out giant tax breaks to billionaire
corporations. So, here we have Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos getting
billions of dollars in tax breaks paid for by kicking 15 million
Americans off their health care and raising health care costs for
millions more.
One of the most ridiculous tax breaks in this bill is called
retroactive research and experimentation expensing. Let's use plain
English on this: this is money to incentivize research that corporations
like Meta and Amazon conducted years ago. We’re going to give them a
break now to incentivize them for things they did a long time ago. So,
because of Trump's horrible bill, the federal government will hand $67
billion in these tax breaks to giant corporations next year.
Now, Mr. Korb, as IRS Chief Counsel, you would be in charge of
drafting the guidance and regulations that will determine whether or not
these corporate tax breaks stay at $67 billion — or, depending on how
you write it, get even more valuable. And given that you have spent the
last 15 years and beyond representing Fortune 500 companies in tax
disputes with the IRS, your work could directly affect your former
clients' bottom lines.
Mr. Korb, help me understand: how does handing out billions of
dollars to corporations for research they already did lower costs for
American families?
Mr. Donald Korb, Nominee for IRS Chief Counsel:
Thank you for that question. And also, I would like to thank you for the
meeting yesterday. I will let you know that my granddaughter, Anna,
really appreciated your signature. I don't want to take up more of your
time, you understand.
Keep in mind that the Chief Counsel is responsible for administering
the tax law. It’s the U.S. Congress that is responsible for enacting the
tax law.
Senator Warren: Okay, so you're saying ‘I don’t have
to answer this question, not my job.’ But Mr. Korb, you were IRS Chief
Counsel for President Bush. You know that the IRS Chief Counsel has a
central role in determining how these laws are implemented through
regulations and guidance. This is where the action is.
So, I’m going to ask one more time: how is a tax break for research —
that's already been done — anything other than a huge windfall for
corporate America?
Mr. Korb: Thank you, Senator, for that question.
While I have some experience with what we used to refer to as the
R&D tax credit during my many years of practice, I have to admit I
am not drilled down on what is in this bill on that point. So I can't
give you any view at this point.
Senator Warren: Okay, let me try another then. The
tax giveaways in the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ are so large that massive
corporations across America will see their tax bills drop dramatically.
According to one estimate, Amazon, for example, is set to pocket over
$15 billion this year alone. Meta will get $11 billion this year alone.
Now, there is one backstop. And that is: back in 2022, Democrats
created a corporate minimum tax that prevents billionaire corporations
from paying a tax rate lower than 15%. Already, corporations are trying
to wiggle out of it by lobbing the Trump Treasury Department and the IRS
to write weaker rules.
Mr. Korb, the corporate minimum tax is the law of the land, just like
the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill.’ When billionaire corporations see their tax
rates drop below 15% because Trump and the Republicans gave them all
these tax cuts, will you commit that you will not write new rules that
let them out of paying the corporate alternative minimum tax?
Mr. Korb: Thank you for that question, Senator. And I
do commit to follow the law that you as the Congress enacted in writing
the regulations.
Senator Warren: So, let me make sure I understand
your answer then, because if anyone should be able to commit to
following the law it should be a person in this job.
Does that mean you will commit to implementing and enforcing the
corporate minimum tax as required by statute? Or do you believe the
corporations are above the law?
Mr. Korb: Again, I have not studied the latest
iteration of this. We have been through corporate minimum taxes,
alternative minimum taxes, back to the ‘86 act and beyond. It keeps
changing, okay. I do have a day job so I’ve not studied every element of
this bill. I apologize for that. Are there, in that particular statute
or provisions, is there authority given to the Treasury to write
regulations?
Senator Warren: Yes. That’s what I said.
Mr. Korb: Okay. That’s what you’re talking about.
Again, keep in mind tax policy is the job of the Treasury. As Chief
Counsel, our lawyers work hand in glove with the Treasury lawyers to do
that. And I will be involved in approving regulations. No question about
it. And so probably I should not offer a view at this point in time
since I am not up to speed yet.
Senator Warren: Well, I just want to say I’m over
time so I’m going to quit here. But, I think it is wrong for the Trump
administration to be handing out literally tens of billions of dollars
to these giant profitable corporations. And you will be in a position to
get them even more. And I am uncomfortable with the way I feel like
you’ve dodged the answers to these questions. I want to hear that we’re
going to hold people at least to what the law specifically requires of
them, even if they are billionaire corporations.
I don't mind making bread from
scratch. But I do like it to be simple. Rhonda e-mailed a recipe that
has too many steps for me. Sorry. But it's for pumpkin bread (from Brown Buttered Blondie) and I know people like pumpkin bread so we'll note it:
Ingredients
1 1/2 cups (190 g) all-purpose flour, spooned and leveled
1 teaspoon baking powder
1/2 teaspoon baking soda
1/2 teaspoon salt
2 teaspoons ground cinnamon
1/4 teaspoon ground nutmeg
1/4 teaspoon ground ginger
1/8 teaspoon ground cloves
1 1/4 cups (250 g) granulated sugar
1/2 cup vegetable oil (I use canola oil)
3/4 cup canned pumpkin puree (not pumpkin pie filling), room temperature
2 large eggs, room temperature
1/4 cup full fat Greek yogurt or sour cream, room temperature
1 1/2 teaspoons vanilla
For Cinnamon Sugar Topping
1/4 cup (50 g) granulated sugar
2 teaspoons ground cinnamon
Directions
Preheat
the oven to 350°F. Line a 9 x 5 loaf pan with parchment paper, allowing
the ends of the parchment to extend over the sides of the pan for easy
removal of the loaf once baked. Set aside.
In a small bowl, whisk together the granulated sugar and cinnamon for the cinnamon sugar topping. Set aside.
Measure
out the pumpkin puree and place it on a plate covered with a folded
paper towel. Use another folded paper towel to gently blot the pumpkin a
few times. Use a light hand and do not blot the pumpkin too much. You
want to remove a little bit of the moisture without drying it out.
To a large bowl, add the pumpkin, granulated sugar, vegetable (canola) oil, Greek yogurt and vanilla. Whisk until smooth.
Add the eggs and whisk until well incorporated.
Sift
the dry ingredients into the pumpkin mixture and use a large spatula or
wooden spoon to gently fold together. Do not overmix. The batter will
look a bit lumpy.
Transfer the batter to the prepared loaf pan and smooth the top with an offset spatula if needed.
Top the batter with the cinnamon sugar mixture, covering the loaf completely. Use all of the cinnamon sugar.
Bake
the loaf on the center rack of the oven for 50 to 55 minutes. Begin
checking the bread at 45 minutes. The bread is done when a toothpick
inserted into the center comes out clean or with a few crumbs remaining.
If the bread is browning too quickly towards the end of the baking
cycle, tent the top loosely with a large piece of aluminum foil.
Remove
the loaf from the oven and allow to cool in the pan for 10 to 15
minutes. Use the parchment paper overhang to carefully lift the loaf
from the pan and transfer to a wire rack to cool completely.
Hedge
fund billionaire Ken Griffin and Chicago Booth Business School
professor Anil Kashyap called Trump’s bid to seize control of monetary
policy a “risky game” akin to a policy by former President Richard
Nixon, which kicked off 1970s stagflation that helped undo at least two
presidential administrations following him.
By
removing veterans on the Fed, including Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Trump
hopes to install allies who will slash interest rates to accommodate his
short-term strategies rather than tweak policy to counter market
disorder.
But Griffin’s and Kashyap’s opinion
in a joint Wall Street Journal editorial reports that Nixon’s own
manipulation of the Fed in the 1970s “contributed to a prolonged surge
in prices.”
“It is in the
president’s best interest for the Fed to be seen as independent — and to
act independently. That independence gives the central bank space to
make difficult choices required to curb inflation,” the financiers
warned. “In a worst-case scenario, if the Fed visibly bows to political
pressure and permits inflation to rise unchecked, tens of millions of
retired Americans will see their savings diminished.”
That,
in turn, could cut away at senior voters, who are among Trump’s more
solid base. “Senior voters — tired of bearing the brunt of inflation —
could cost the administration dearly in the midterms,” they wrote.
Credibility
in economic policymaking is built slowly, they say, through respect for
processes, but that credibility can be quickly lost. And without it,
the costs of borrowing money rises, sustainable growth drops and global
confidence in U.S. institutions falters.
Grasp
that and grasp that Chump's not only willing to destroy retirement
savings, he's also willing to destroy worldwide confidence in the US
economy. Without that independent Federal Reserve, there's no reason to
trust the American dollar.
Wednesday, September 10, 2025. Chump goes out to eat last night nd
gets booed, he issues a denial insisting that the birthday greeting to
Jeffrey Epstein is not his, turns out a deal was made with Ghislaine
Maxwell before she spoke to Deputy AG Todd Blanche, the American people
need to know what that deal was, Chump continues to slaughter the
economy on all fronts -- employments, housing and inflation -- and much
more.
The
U.S. labor market is experiencing a turbulent phase in 2025, with job
losses reaching alarming levels. Reports indicate that over 800,000 jobs
have been cut in the first seven months of the year, marking a 75%
increase compared to the same period in 2024. This surge in job cuts is
the highest since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, which saw over 1.8
million layoffs.
A report by
Challenger, Gray & Christmas highlights three primary causes for
these job cuts. Among them, the economic conditions and uncertainty
stemming from the tariffs imposed during Trump's administration are
significant contributors. These tariffs have increased the cost of
essential inputs for many U.S. businesses, squeezing profit margins.
Andrew
Challenger, a labor expert, noted that tariff-related concerns have
directly impacted nearly 6,000 jobs this year. The lack of clarity on
whether tariffs will remain, increase, or decrease adds to the economic
uncertainty, making it challenging for businesses to strategize
effectively. However, tariffs are not the sole factor in the current
employment crisis.
President Donald Trump has promised his high tariffs will inspire an American manufacturing renaissance.
Yet so far his controversial experiment has failed to inspire a jobs boom. Not only is hiring weak, but the industries most exposed to tariffs have been shedding workers – exactly the opposite of the intended outcome.
Job
growth in tariff-impacted sectors including manufacturing, construction
and transportation turned negative shortly after Trump started his
trade war this spring, according to a new analysis by Apollo Global
chief economist Torsten Slok.
Slok’s research,
based on a three-month moving average of Bureau of Labor Statistics data
on employment, shows that while tariff-impacted sectors had moments of
job loss in recent years, this is the first time payroll growth is
negative over a period of several months.
Employment in industries not affected by tariffs continues to increase, albeit at a slower pace than before the trade war.
Economist Justin Wolfers is sounding the alarm on the
potential for stagflation, warning that proposed tariffs could inflict a
painful combination of slowing growth and rising prices on the U.S.
economy.
In a recent interview, the University of Michigan
professor cautioned that Americans could soon get "‘two bad tastes at
the same time'—rising unemployment and rising inflation."
Wolfers
explained that the ingredients for this challenging scenario are
already present. He broke down the dual nature of stagflation,
describing it as a mix of economic stagnation and persistent inflation.
Also sounding the alarm is Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase. Hugh Son (CNBC) reports
he sees trouble coming and quotes him stating, "I think the economy is
weakening. Whether it's on the way to recession or just weakening, I
don't know."
Stephanie Ruhle has noted repeatedly on her MSNBC
program THE 11TH HOUR how various business leaders who would normally be
weighing in and expressing concern over the economy have been silent
for months now. Apparently, silence is no longer an option. CBS NEWS'
conversation with former CBO director Douglas Holtz-Eakin makes that
clear.
"Dead
in the water." The economy -- the bad economy -- is producing anxiety
in the housing market but it's not producing jobs. That includes for
Chump's tiny dicked base of boys who wish they were men. Courtney Brown (AXIOS) reports:
Younger adults are facing the worst labor market shock in years, one far more acute than the rest of the population.
Why
it matters: There's no denying the misery for young people who can't
find work. It might stunt their career growth for decades to come.
Threat level: What's
holding back hiring is a mix of fleeting, cyclical factors — economic
uncertainty as a result of Trump's trade policies, for instance, or high
interest rates.
Other factors, like the uptake of AI
eliminating entry-level positions, are likely structural. The result
might be a difficult hiring environment for younger people for the
foreseeable future.
Young but less-educated Americans also feel
the pinch. The sluggish pace of job gains is widespread across the
economy, including in industries that, in normal times, would be the
most likely to hire them.
What they're saying:
"There is a pile-up of young people that are looking for work," says
Guy Berger, the director of economic research at the Burning Glass
Institute.
18 to 29 year old White males -- don't call them men -- voted 63% for Chump. You got what you wanted boys. No jobs.
They're
so worried about their manhood that they can't see straight. They give
themselves names like "Big Balls" but they're not men, they're cowardly
little boys as we all saw when "Big Balls" got jumped in DC by
children. By children. Big Balls? Try no balls.
The Trump administration is obviously attempting to follow the
familiar playbook by which autocracies consolidate their power,
effectively turning America into a one-party state where almost everyone
accepts that resistance to the regime is futile and is afraid to show
any signs of opposition.
And by and large America’s elites have
offered no more resistance to authoritarian consolidation than a wet
Kleenex. But historically, anti-democratic parties that establish
lasting autocracies have done so with considerable initial support from
the broader public. At least at first, they’re actually popular,
especially because they deliver, or seem to deliver, major economic
gains.
That’s not happening for Trump, at all. And the big
question — to which I don’t know the answer — is whether a regime that
inherited a good economy but ruined it and whose non-economic policies
are deeply unpopular can still consolidate autocratic rule.
Epstein
and Maxwell, the economy, his attacks on immigrnts, attacking US
cities as though they're foreign countries? It's all piling up on
Chump. Sara Dorn (FORBES) explains:
Big Number
43%.
That’s Trump’s average approval rating so far during his second term,
slightly higher than his 41% average approval rating throughout the
duration of his first term, according to Gallup.
What Was Biden’s Approval Rating At This Point In His Term?
49%, according to Gallup’s Aug. 2-17, 2021 average.
As Ben notes this morning on MEIDASTOUCH NEWS, Chump went out last night and was greeted with boos.
What was it that Frederick Trump always used to say? Oh,
that's right, "Donald, you candy ass cry baby, you f**k up everything
you touch. You're an embarrassment to the family and I will never take
your mother's word that you are actually my flesh and blood. Stop
crying, you big baby."
I think Frederick Trump was onto something.
Let's
turn to Chump and his longterm relationships with convicted sex
traffickers Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Lawrence O'Donnell
pointed out last night that it took Chump over 24 hours but last night
Chump himself finally responded to Congress releasing the birthday card
he made for Jeffrey Epstein.
What
a little bitch. We all know it's his signature. It's in Epstein's
book. Chump says he doesn't use those words when, in fact, he does.
It's his signature and his style of drawing. At another time, we might
all be made to put our heads on our desks to see if Chump, the lying
student in the classroom, could return what he's stolen if we all
weren't looking.
He's pathetic.
MSNBC has compiled some of their coverage from yesterday on Chump's ongoing lies and his ongoing scandal.
A
Democratic lawmaker kept insisting Donald Trump may be guilty of
wrongdoing during his friendship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and
CNN anchor John Berman kept replying with disclaimers on Tuesday.
Rep.
Dave Min (D-Calif.), a member of the House Oversight Committee, and
Berman were discussing Monday’s release of Epstein records that included
a photo of Epstein and a Mar-a-Lago club member with an oversize check
that had an obviously fake Trump signature on it. The caption joked that
Trump bought a “fully depreciated” woman. The entry was part of the
“birthday book” made for Epstein in 2003 that Epstein’s estate handed
over to the committee.
The committee has been
investigating the Justice Department’s handling of the human
sex-trafficking case against Epstein (which was dropped after he died in
prison in 2019), while Trump has backed off from his promise to release
documents connected to his former friend.
Min
noted how Epstein’s victims, ranging in age from 12 to 22, said in
testimony to the committee that they felt “commodified” and
“disrespected.” He also asserted that Trump was part of Epstein’s inner
circle.
Berman offered one of many statements
to clarify matters and perhaps steer CNN clear of legal exposure.
“Again, I do want to say we have no reason to think that he was in any
way involved with that check itself, ” the journalist said. “Also, no
reason to think he’s conducted any wrongdoing involving Jeffrey
Epstein.”
“I would say we have lots of reasons to think
he was involved in wrongdoing,” Min interrupted. “I mean, at this
point, there’s a lot of smoke. There may be some fire, but I would just
push back and say I think there’s a lot reason to think Donald Trump was
involved.”
The
stunning release of a photograph of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein
holding a joke novelty check as payment for a woman at Donald Trump’s
Mar-a-Lago estate may be a precursor to even worse revelations about
Trump and his former friend.
Appearing on MSNBC
on Tuesday morning, former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade claimed the
photo, which has been described as “Epstein and a longtime Mar-a-Lago
member joking about selling a 'fully depreciated' woman to Donald Trump
for $22,500," is far more alarming than the actual birthday letter Trump
allegedly wrote to his pal Epstein, which was also revealed on on
Monday after being hinted at weeks ago.
McQuade was asked on “Morning Joe, “Where do you see this going from a legal perspective?”
“I
found this item even more troubling than the drawing because of what it
suggests,” she began. “Now, of course, it appears that it was created
by some member, It may be a completely fabricated joke, but, you know,
people make jokes based on some grain of truth because that's what makes
it funny.”
“So I think it raises a lot of
questions,” she continued. “I also think the drawing suggests, you know,
the drawing itself is sort of bawdy, but it suggests a close
relationship with Trump — if it's authentic — referring to Jeffrey
Epstein as his pal and that they have secrets together. So I think it
raises a lot of questions as to where it's going.”
Seems
a number of people believe where there's smoke, there's fire. Chump
himself created that viewpoint when, after insisting all the files would
be released, then went with there are no files and then made a deal
with Ghislaine Maxwell to shut her up -- about what we don't know -- in
exchange for sending her to Club Fed in Bryant, Texas. And then he made
it even worse with his lies about a birthday card. There's a lot of
sludge flowing down The Chump Denial.
Did someone say Jizzy Pants Maxwell? The convict and her cushy new home were noted by Rachel Maddow Monday night.
An
attorney for convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell told a CNN
panel that defendants like his client who cooperate with the government
typically do so in order to get something in return.
During
an appearance on CNN NewsNight, attorney Arthur Aidala told host Abby
Phillip that he couldn’t discuss the specifics of Maxwell being moved to
a lower-security prison after she met with Trump’s Deputy Attorney
General Todd Blanche in July.
But asked why
Maxwell was transferred to a “cushier prison” following the two-day
interview, Aidala said he could “talk in generalities.”
“When
anybody who’s represented by a lawyer who knows what they’re doing goes
in and meets with the government, there’s always a quid pro quo,” he
said. “You don’t just take your client in and say, ‘Let me talk to you
about something.’ They wanted information from—hypothetically, anytime
the government wants information from a citizen, the citizen says,
‘Well, I have a right to remain silent. If you want me to give up that
right, I need something in return.’”
So
a deal was made before a word was spoken? And somehow the White House
didn't feel the deal needed to be released to the American public or
even acknowledged? Who works for who? Can someone help me out with
that because I love the United States and was raised to believe that our
government works for us. Not the other way around. So when Chump
makes a deal with a convicted pedophile and sex trafficker and does so
as a public servant, he's not only on the clock, he's working for us and
we have the right to know what Maxwell gave and was required to give in
order for him to move her to a prison that she did not qualify for.
He's put her in a low level prison and she's a convicted sex offender.
People in Bryan have not just complained, they have actively protested
her being at Camp Fed and arguing that her presence is a threat to their
neighborhood.
They're right too. That's why sex offenders like Maxwell are not supposed to be in these prisons.
Donald
made a deal and fat boy works for us, not the other way around. It's
past time to remind him of that and Congress needs to demand that the
Justice Dept release every bit of paperwork they have on Maxwell's deal
that resulted in a prison transfer.
By the way, Propaganda Pig
Karoline Leavett briefly addressed the developments in the Epstein and
Maxwell scandal. Let me quote Ann's coverage of it:
Following Monday’s blockbuster Wall Street Journal story,
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was certain to face tough
questions about President Donald Trump’s connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
But it was perhaps something of a surprise that the first of those
queries came from a former reporter for Breitbart.
During
Tuesday afternoon’s White House briefing, Charlie Spiering — a former
correspondent for Breitbart who currently works for the Daily Mail —
grilled Leavitt with some pointed questions on Trump and Epstein.
“The
Epstein files are back in the news because a lot of Americans feel that
Jeffrey Epstein’s victims never got justice,” Spiering said. “Does the
President care about these victims? Do you think he can — does he want
to deliver more justice for them, and is he willing to meet with them?”
“The President cares about victims of all crimes,” Leavitt replied. “[Oink~ Oink~ Oink!!!]"
Spiering asked Leavitt a second time about the prospect of Trump meeting with Epstein victims.
“Will the president meet with the victims?” Speiring asked.
But Leavitt ignored the question and called on another reporter.
And then Propaganda Pig Karoline Leavitt trotted back off to her pigsty.
In
the meantime, everyone continues attempting to figure out Speaker of
the Closet Mike Johnon's recent remarks that Chump was a snitch to the
FBI on Epstein. Chris Stirewalt (THE HILL) offers:
Writing
about the Jeffrey Epstein saga has the feeling of using an air horn. It
calls a great deal of attention to oneself, produces unpredictable and
intense results in its audience and really should be saved for moments
when it’s absolutely necessary — scaring off a charging bear, preventing
a maritime disaster, being Pitbull, etc.
Then
you read something like this: “[Speaker Mike Johnson] went on to say,
‘[President Trump] was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff
down.’” And you find yourself pulling open the junk drawer in the
kitchen and rummaging for that air horn you bought as a stocking stuffer
last Christmas.
When the Speaker then
clarified that he was only “reiterating what the victims’ attorney said”
— the part about how Trump had cooperated with investigators during the
first Epstein prosecution but not the part about how the president had
done an “about-face” — then you’ve got to push that little red button.
It
would be one thing if the Speaker had a reputation as a liar, but even
his fiercest enemies would have to acknowledge that Johnson is known to
be a very honest man. Or if Johnson were stupid, it might be reasonable
to think that he didn’t know how police informants work. But Johnson, a
lawyer and law professor, has proven to be a lot smarter than most in
Washington. He keeps passing bill after bill despite having a majority
thinner than the ones that ate his three immediate Republican
predecessors alive.
The most
obvious and unpleasant explanation for why Johnson would say that Donald
Trump was undercover for the FBI trying to bring down an international
ring of pedophiles is that somebody told him it was true. The list of
people who might tell Johnson something like that and whom Johnson would
believe well enough to repeat the claim is very, very short. Maybe even
just one name long, signed with a flourish…
The
obvious part of why it’s not pleasant to write (or read) about the
Epstein case is the luridness of all of it. That, of course, is also the
largest part of why this story, more than any of the other similarly
ripe scandals of the second Trump term, has persisted. The wild
buckraking the president and his family are doing is no less active or
ethically profane than it was when the Qataris gave him a jumbo jet and
his family was holding soirees for foreign cryptocurrency patrons this
spring. But sex sells, and the more taboo and shameful the better.
And
on THE DAILY BEAST podcast, Michael Wolfe offered his take and how it
might have something to do with money laundering that Chump did for
Russia.
Let's note this press release from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:
Donald Korb spent his career
transitioning between the IRS and law firms, where he defended some of
the biggest corporations being investigated by the IRS
Warren on proposed ethics
commitments for Korb: “By making these commitments, you would increase
Americans’ trust in your ability to serve the public interest—rather
than the special interests of mega-corporations seeking tax breaks.”
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren
(D-Mass.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, wrote to Donald
Korb, nominee for Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
ahead of Korb’s confirmation hearing, pressing him on his stark
conflicts of interest and urging him to make ethics commitments to
mitigate these conflicts.
“I have been raising the alarm for years about this insidious
revolving door at the Department of the Treasury and the IRS, which
threatens the important work of the agencies,” wrote Senator Warren.
“I am concerned that, if confirmed, you would enter this role with
significant conflicts of interest that could cloud your judgment or
raise questions about the integrity of IRS decisions in which you are
involved.”
Throughout Mr. Korb’s career, he has transitioned between roles at
the IRS—including serving as Chief Counsel under President George W.
Bush—and positions as a lawyer and lobbyist for large, tax-dodging
corporations. Mr. Korb began his career at the IRS, where he worked from
1973 to 1986. Mr. Korb later became a lobbyist, until he was nominated
to be IRS Chief Counsel in 2003 by President Bush. After leaving office,
he joined the firm Sullivan & Cromwell, where he headed the tax
controversy department, defending some of the country’s wealthiest
corporations being investigated by the IRS, as well as continuing to
lobby for wealthy firms.
“As IRS Chief Counsel under President Trump, you would be responsible
for advising the IRS on disputes with these former clients and would
advise the IRS and Treasury on tax regulations that will affect your
former clients, absent appropriate recusal measures,” wrote Senator Warren.
Senator Warren is requesting that Mr. Korb, should he be confirmed:
Recuse himself for four years from all specific-party matters
involving his former clients and employers and all particular matters
that are likely to directly and predictably affect their financial
interests;
Refrain from seeking employment or board membership with, or another
form of compensation from, a company that has been engaged in a dispute
or other interaction with the IRS regarding which he provided legal
advice for at least four years after leaving office; and
Agree not to serve as a lobbyist or informal “shadow lobbyist” for at least four years after leaving office.
Senator Warren noted that the prior IRS Chief Counsel Marjorie
Rollinson made these commitments as part of her confirmation process,
alongside other Biden Administration nominees.
“By making these commitments, you would increase Americans’ trust in
your ability to serve the public interest—rather than the special
interests of mega-corporations seeking tax breaks—during your time at
the IRS,” concluded the senator.