Jonathan Burleigh (WSWS) reports on a story I was not aware of at all before reading his report:
Opposition continues to grow to the decision by University of California officials to fire roughly 80 striking grad students at UC Santa Cruz, who have refused to submit grades until their demands for a cost-of-living increase is granted. Last week the strike spread to graduate students at UC Davis (UCD) and UC Santa Barbara (UCSB), with students in at least one department at UC Berkeley announcing a sympathy strike. There are major protests and grad student assemblies being held today in Santa Cruz, Davis, Santa Barbara, Los Angeles, Berkeley, San Diego and other UC campuses.
Last Friday, UC President Janet Napolitano, the former US Secretary of Homeland Security under President Obama, and other UC officials terminated the students, making it clear that their major crime was defying the labor agreement signed by the United Auto Workers last year, which enforces poverty wages and a no-strike clause.
The graduate students’ chief demand is a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), ranging from about $1,400 to $1,800 per month depending on the campus, to cover the skyrocketing cost of rent in California. The majority of graduate students at multiple UC campuses spend over 50 percent of their salary on rent.
As support grows on and off the campuses, the unions and the Democratic Party are working hard to contain the strike and prevent it from spreading off campus and triggering a broader movement of the working class.
The UAW has publicly stated it will not defend the strikers for any activity not covered by the contract. After the firings, the UAW filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board. The complaint, however, is not over the unjust and vindictive firing of the grad students. Instead it complains that the administration had agreed to negotiate with the grad students who were acting outside of the legally sanctioned labor-management relationship.
The UAW and other unions are complicit in the strikebreaking action of Napolitano, which is backed by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, billionaire Richard Blum (husband of Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein), and the rest of the Democratic Party-appointed UC Board of Regents.
Go read the report and share it with your friends. This is an important story.
Also, go read Ava and C.I.'s "TV: The future is out there" which deals with a lot. I'll even spoonfeed you -- in their section on Chris Matthews, they note a Washington Post columnist and they're talking about Richard Cohen -- a former Washington Post columnist. They wrote that Sunday but the rest of the edition wasn't finished until today. After it went up, Ty had to go in and add a note that Chris Matthews has left MSNBC.
This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Monday:
Monday, March 2 ,2020. Two depart the race for the Democratic Party's
presidential nomination and a prime minister-designate in Iraq announces
he's out.
And then there were . . . how many? As the race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination continues, it continues with two less candidates. Saturday, Tom Steyer dropped out after coming in third in the South Carolina primary. Yesterday, Pete Buttigieg dropped out.
Though Tom ran a campaign on issues, you'd never know it to watch the laments that followed. With regards to Tom, immediately various 'leaders' spoke up to inform the country how Tom could now best use his own money. Pete ran a campaign devoted to assisting the corporations. The post-Pete drivel was all about how he'd proven so much and he'd inspired so many and this was the first in a long line of campaigns to come.
Really? Well let's hope in future campaigns that he does better than 8.2% of the voters.
It goes without saying that it was the Neera crowd lamenting Pete. The White-White crowd. Realizing how far she'd gone, one White former actress felt the need to Tweet a photo of one of her adopted children. No word on whether, like last time, she Googled her name and "black child" to find the photo this time.
Some tried to insist that Pete would make a great Secretary of Veterans Affairs. This group wasn't a group of veterans or a group representing veterans. As we noted here throughout his campaign, Pete didn't register with veterans. That's because he never spoke of veterans issues. Also, it's because he's really not a veteran. He's a cut-in-line guy who avoided the boot camps and other requirements by who he knew. He wanted a title and, when he could be given one, he signed up. Real veterans don't tend to respect the Toy Soldiers.
Pete hurt his case further by never knowing what a veterans issue was. US House Rep Tulsi Gabbard and US House Rep Seth Moulton both had the respect of their fellow veterans. Whether that would translate into votes or not, other veterans did look at the two and know that they were fighting for all veterans. And Tulsi and Seth actually saw combat.
All Pete had was the laughable 'Vote Vets' -- a hideous and partisan front group that might be in trouble with the FEC. No candidate had less experience than Pete. But Steve Bullock dropped out without getting the easy praise. Kamala Harris was not treated like a hero when she dropped out. He never happened but the press is still trying to make him happen.
Tomorrow is Super Tuesday. NPR provides a run down of what that means. The following Tweet goes to what it means for most Americans.
And then there were . . . how many? As the race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination continues, it continues with two less candidates. Saturday, Tom Steyer dropped out after coming in third in the South Carolina primary. Yesterday, Pete Buttigieg dropped out.
Though Tom ran a campaign on issues, you'd never know it to watch the laments that followed. With regards to Tom, immediately various 'leaders' spoke up to inform the country how Tom could now best use his own money. Pete ran a campaign devoted to assisting the corporations. The post-Pete drivel was all about how he'd proven so much and he'd inspired so many and this was the first in a long line of campaigns to come.
Really? Well let's hope in future campaigns that he does better than 8.2% of the voters.
It goes without saying that it was the Neera crowd lamenting Pete. The White-White crowd. Realizing how far she'd gone, one White former actress felt the need to Tweet a photo of one of her adopted children. No word on whether, like last time, she Googled her name and "black child" to find the photo this time.
Some tried to insist that Pete would make a great Secretary of Veterans Affairs. This group wasn't a group of veterans or a group representing veterans. As we noted here throughout his campaign, Pete didn't register with veterans. That's because he never spoke of veterans issues. Also, it's because he's really not a veteran. He's a cut-in-line guy who avoided the boot camps and other requirements by who he knew. He wanted a title and, when he could be given one, he signed up. Real veterans don't tend to respect the Toy Soldiers.
Pete hurt his case further by never knowing what a veterans issue was. US House Rep Tulsi Gabbard and US House Rep Seth Moulton both had the respect of their fellow veterans. Whether that would translate into votes or not, other veterans did look at the two and know that they were fighting for all veterans. And Tulsi and Seth actually saw combat.
All Pete had was the laughable 'Vote Vets' -- a hideous and partisan front group that might be in trouble with the FEC. No candidate had less experience than Pete. But Steve Bullock dropped out without getting the easy praise. Kamala Harris was not treated like a hero when she dropped out. He never happened but the press is still trying to make him happen.
Tomorrow is Super Tuesday. NPR provides a run down of what that means. The following Tweet goes to what it means for most Americans.
This single 45-second video explains the difference between @BernieSanders and @JoeBiden. In a 5-day period, Republicans tried to cut Social Security. You’ll see which side Bernie and Joe were on.
Take 45 second to watch it — and retweet.
David SirotaIn Iraq, Mohammed Tawfiq Allawi will no longer attempt to become prime minister. Ghassan Adnan and Isabel Coles (WALL STREET JOURNAL) report, "Iraq’s prime minister-designate withdrew his candidacy for the position on Sunday, saying he faced obstruction from some political factions over reforms, deepening political turmoil in the country as it faces a growing coronavirus challenge."
#BREAKING: Iraqi Prime Minister designate Mohammed Tawfiq Allawi announces his withdrawal after failing to secure parliamentary support for his cabinet selection.
Abbas Kadhim offers this take.
#Iraq
Prime Minister Candidate Mohammad Tawfik Allawi withdrew his nomination after the passing of his constitutional 30-day deadline to secure a CoR vote of confidence. (1)
Mr. Allawi blamed the “corrupt partisan politicians” for his inability to form a government. That is true in part.
But, on the other hand, he submitted a partial cabinet whose members are completely unsatisfactory. (2)
#Iraq
Some of Mr. Allawi’s proposed ministers are accused of acts which, if true, should disqualify them from office and call his judgment into question. Others are too old and/or not in touch with #Iraq for a long time. (3)
Mr. Allawi made several mistakes, other than the bad selection. He accused MPs of conspiring to bring him down, calling those who didn’t support him corrupt & essentially dishonorable. (4)
This development will bring #Iraq’s President Dr. @BarhamSalih back to the drawing board to nominate another candidate in the next 15 days, as PM @AdilAbdAlMahdi’s govt. continues its caretaker role for up to 45 days, or more if no new PM is confirmed. (5)
THE DAILY SABAH notes:
Allawi's withdrawal a month after having been selected plunges the country into further uncertainty at a critical time, as the country weathers troubled times, including ongoing anti-government protests and the constant threat of being ensnared by festering U.S.-Iranian tension. Allawi's departure leaves President Barham Saleh with 15 days to propose a new candidate, whom he could name unilaterally without consulting parliament. According to political sources, the president intends to propose intelligence chief Mustafa al-Kazimi.
This is not the first time that it's been rumored Saleh will back al-Kazimi. Back in December, AFP reported Saleh was considering al-Kazimi "who is seen to have US backing."
And the protests continue.
Teachers in #Babylon march in protests to underscore the peacefulness of the #Iraqi revolution, a day after #Allawi announced withdrawing his candidacy for prime minister amid public rejection
#BaghdadPost #IraqProtests #saveIraqipeople | #يسقط_محمد_علاوي #يسقط_مقتدى_الصدر
#Iraqi protesters in Al-Tahrir square, #Baghdad, chant "the people want the fall of the regime" after #Allawi withdrew his candidacy for prime minister
#BaghdadPost #IraqProtests #saveIraqipeople | #يسقط_محمد_علاوي #يسقط_مقتدى_الصدر
Telegram Channel: t.me/TheBaghdadPost…
