Declassified cables released last Friday provide irrefutable evidence that the current CIA director, Gina Haspel, played a direct role in the torture of detainees at a CIA black site in Thailand in 2002. The National Security Archive obtained the documents through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Haspel was chief of base at “Detention Site Green” (also known as “Cat’s Eye”) and either wrote or authorized the cables.
The publication of the damning cables was given short shrift by the corporate media. The New York Times and the Washington Post each published only one article on the story in their August 10 editions. Both newspapers placed the story on their inside pages and buried it thereafter.
Haspel, tapped by Trump earlier this year to succeed Mike Pompeo, who was promoted to secretary of state, served as acting director beginning last April 26 and became director on May 26. The Democrats supplied the necessary votes to assure her confirmation by the Senate following hearings in May. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearings on Haspel’s nomination provided a revealing exposure of the criminality of the US intelligence apparatus as well as the disintegration of bourgeois democratic processes in the United States.
The hearing was characterized by gushing tributes by both Democrats and Republicans for the work of an agency long ago dubbed “Murder, Inc.” for its crimes around the world, including the organization of political assassinations, the creation of terrorist armies and the orchestration of fascist-military coups.
West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, who after the hearing became the first Democrat to announce his support for the nomination, went so far as to tell Haspel that when speaking to constituents, “I brag about what you people do in the Clandestine Services.”
Whether it's Manchin, Burr or Warner, they should be ashamed. This is disgusting. They have betrayed us. They have betrayed the Constitution. This is appalling.
They should be questioned about this issue but, instead, the corporate press buries the story.
They're disgusting as well.
By the way, "Kat's Korner: Another classis release from The Cowboy Junkies" went up Sunday. I loved her review so I got the new album and it's really good.
This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Wednesday:
President Erdoğan: “We will continue to stand in solidarity with Iraq in the fight against all terrorist organizations, particularly DAESH.
We have reached an agreement to increase our efforts to completely clear the PKK from Iraq.”
A wee little man and a wee little man was he.
Nagapushpa Devendra (GLOBAL RESEARCH) notes:
Hundreds of Iraqis took to the streets, demanding actions to tackle corruption, to bolster the weak economy and to improve the provision of basic services. Since employment is their major demand, the protestors mostly targeted economic sites such as Umm Qasr port, Zubayr oil field and Shiba gas field in Basra. In a matter of days, the protest that resonated in Basra, quickly spread like a copious cloud to other provinces like Maysan, Karbala, Najaf, Babel, and Dhi Qar, taking the government by surprise.
This massive movement, with the potential to reshape Iraq was simmering with sulking water security that worsened after Turkey threatened to construct a dam, reducing the flow from the Tigris River into the Mosul Dam Lake. It was followed by Iran’s announcement in June that its massive new water project, which would divert the waters from west to the parched parts of east in the country, is at its edge of completion. In other words, it means diversion the waters of the little Zab and Sirwan rivers, both of which flow into Iraqi Kurdistan. The Middle East is already grappling with a crippling water shortage that shows few signs of abating. This year, rain too has failed them. Under these circumstances, the competition over shared water resources between these three countries is all set to intensify. Without an effective working mechanism, water conflict could potentially become a serious challenge to Iraq’s bilateral relationship with Iran and Turkey.
Instead of addressing the water disputes however, the Iraqi government has set its priority in resolving reports of frauds, vote rigging and political interference that took place during the 12 May elections. In the post-ISIS era, politics in Iraq has become livelihood of the Iraqi judiciary, bureaucrats, and the political elites who are thoroughly engaged in the manual recount of ballots. Few of them are also insisting on re-election and are willing to go at any such lengths to secure few of additional seats in the parliament. The political infighting among the Iraqi parties is not only delaying the formation of the new government but also has proven to be an impediment in the governance of the country. As a result, Iraqi’s trust in government and political parties has reached a historical low. It appears that they like the idea of democracy but loathe the reality.
Hayder's done nothing to address the water shortage. This is going to be a regular feature of Iraq unless it's addressed. And 'addressing' the issue is not cutting off crops -- which will cause problems this winter -- or allowing livestock to perish from lack of water.
He has no answers. The Iraqi people are under threat and Hayder has no answers. His only thought is how to attack the Iraqi people. Devendra notes:
Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has alternated between trying to suppress the protest by shutting the internet service and, more ominously had redeployed counterterrorism force who were given orders to arrest all demonstrators, and forcibly break the protest. Apparently, the Iraqi security force had beaten and fired on the protestors, killing and wounding more than 800.
The International Crisis Group sums up July's protests in Iraq as follows, "Security forces responded harshly, in some places shooting at protesters, and killing around 50." The protests are ongoing but what should stand out from that sentence is that ICG counts "around 50" protesters killed in July. The western press has run with 14 dead. There is a huge difference. The western press has run with 14 dead and they have been criticized for undercounting.
As July came to an end, ICG offered an overview of the protests which included:
Yet again this summer, residents of southern Iraq have taken to the streets to protest the government’s inability to provide clean water, a steady power supply or reliable employment. The protests started in Basra, which though it is home to most of the country’s oil fields suffers from persistent state neglect. Like a brushfire, the unrest spread to cities across the south, sometimes burning itself out or being extinguished by security forces, only to be rekindled in other locales, and eventually reaching Baghdad, where it smoulders today. The protests’ annual recurrence and present intensity suggest that the status quo – repeated, unfulfilled promises of reform by a politically bankrupt ruling elite – is shaky at best. If the state sticks to its firefighting approach, it is likely at best to ignite further rounds of protests; at worst, it risks being usurped by a new strongman. There is a much better third way forward: the new government, once it is seated, with the help of parliament and the full backing of the most senior religious authorities, should re-empower the judiciary and other independent oversight agencies to stamp out corruption – Iraq’s most dangerous foe.
[. . .]
The protests began in Basra on 8
July, near the West Qurna and Zubayr oil fields outside town, escalating
when police fired on demonstrators at West Qurna. That
the largest city in Iraq’s south – and some of its largest oil fields –
again became the epicentre of unrest is no coincidence. Many Basrawis
see international oil companies and their own leaders as getting rich
off their province’s oil, while little of that wealth trickles down to
benefit them. By threatening oil production and trade, they are pressing
the government to slice them a bigger piece of the pie through better
service delivery and job creation. One typical protest banner read:
“2,500,000 barrels per day; $70 per barrel; 2,500,000 x 70 = 0. Sorry,
Pythagoras: we’re in Basra”.
In some southern cities, such as
Hilla, the protesters even attacked the offices of the Sadr movement.
The Sadrists had risen to prominence in 2003-2004 with their nationalist
fervour and pitched battles with U.S. troops – as well as their
rhetorical broadsides against parties, like Badr and Daawa, that were
members of the U.S.-sponsored post-2003 governments. In
the years since the 2011 U.S. troop withdrawal, the Sadrists have
participated in and even led demonstrations similar to this summer’s.
This time, the movement’s leader, Muqtada al-Sadr, refrained from
encouraging his supporters to join the protests, his electoral alliance
having finished first in the May polls and joined efforts to form a
coalition government with the very same parties he had previously
denounced for their corruption. Yet in a nod to the strength of popular
sentiment, on 19 July, he called on the political parties to delay
government formation in order to address the protesters’ demands.
As in years past, demonstrators
also denounced Iran. To many Iraqis, Iran’s role in supporting Iraq’s
ruling elites makes Tehran an antagonist of their struggle for change.
This summer’s protests erupted after Iran cut off its electricity supply
to Iraq, prompting Iraqis to suggest that Iran was seeking to instigate
unrest. There are conflicting explanations of what triggered the move –
Iraq’s non-payment of electricity bills or Iran’s need to cope with
spiking domestic demand, its own protests amid scorching heat and/or the
weight of reimposed U.S. sanctions. But there is no evidence that Iran’s motive was sinister.
[. . .]
The government responded to the
protests with a heavier hand than in the past, while offering the usual
promises of reform. On 15 July, Abadi dispatched several “emergency
response” police divisions as well as Counter-Terrorism Service (CTS)
battalions to the south to protect government infrastructure and
political party offices. The
deployment of the CTS, which made its mark in the fight against ISIS,
fanned the flames; to the protesters, it implied that the government
looks at them as enemies or even terrorists. Police shot at protesters in various southern cities, killing fifteen (as of 21 July) and leaving hundreds wounded. Armed
groups linked to Shiite Islamist political parties, the paramilitary
Hashd al-Shaabi, also attacked protesters, to defend their political
order. In
Baghdad, where protesters have been gathering around Tahrir Square on
and off for several years, police for the first time used water cannons
to disperse them on 20 July.
To help suppress the protests,
the government took the unprecedented step of shutting down internet and
other telecommunications on 12 July; service has remained intermittent
since then. This
measure affected several industries, such as banks and airlines, and
reportedly could be costing the country $50 million per day.
At the same time, both the
federal and local governments issued promises that they would make
personnel changes, improve service delivery and carry out reforms to
accommodate the protesters’ demands. For instance, Abadi announced he
would spend some 3.5 trillion Iraqi dinars (almost $3 billion) on
electricity, water and health projects in Basra, and inject 800 billion
dinars ($675 million) into the housing fund, enabling it to make 25,000
housing loans and, in the process, generate jobs. The oil minister announced he would create 10,000 more public sector jobs in the hydrocarbon industry.
The government’s harsh overall
response appears to reflect its own sense of insecurity and awareness of
its credibility deficit, if not outright lack of legitimacy. Arguably,
the repression and seemingly empty reform promises will merely stoke
the fires, perhaps turning this year’s unrest into something more
consequential than in the past.
Again, these are ongoing protests.
One day, the walls will eventually come down and the people will prevail in the face of all corrupt politicians and the media that covers their tracks. #IraqProtests #العراق_ينتفض_ضد_الفاسدين #العراق_احتجاجات #العراق_ينتفض #العراقيين_الى_أين #العراق
Since Iraqi Security Forces fired live bullets on protesters in #Basra today, I would like to remind the world about the bullets fired during internet shutdown. Public response: “With our souls, with our blood, we shall defend you, O’Iraq.” @UNIraq #IraqProtests #العراق_ينتفض
Yesterday, the US State Dept issued the following:
Readout
Office of the Spokesperson
Washington, DC
August 14, 2018
The below is attributable to Spokesperson Heather Nauert:
Secretary Pompeo spoke with Prime Minister of Iraq Haider al Abadi and Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani of the Kurdistan Regional Government. The Secretary expressed appreciation for the two leaders’ progress in resolving outstanding Baghdad-Erbil issues according to the Iraqi constitution’s framework for dialogue. In his conversations with each leader, the Secretary emphasized the importance of forming a moderate new Iraqi government, pursuant to the constitutional timeline, that is responsive to the expectations of the Iraqi people. The Secretary commended recent successful joint operations by Iraqi forces and Kurdish Peshmerga against ISIS. Finally, the Secretary underscored continuing U.S. support for a strong, sovereign, and prosperous Iraq as outlined in our bilateral Strategic Framework Agreement with Iraq.
Secretary Pompeo spoke with Prime Minister of Iraq Haider al Abadi and Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani of the Kurdistan Regional Government. The Secretary expressed appreciation for the two leaders’ progress in resolving outstanding Baghdad-Erbil issues according to the Iraqi constitution’s framework for dialogue. In his conversations with each leader, the Secretary emphasized the importance of forming a moderate new Iraqi government, pursuant to the constitutional timeline, that is responsive to the expectations of the Iraqi people. The Secretary commended recent successful joint operations by Iraqi forces and Kurdish Peshmerga against ISIS. Finally, the Secretary underscored continuing U.S. support for a strong, sovereign, and prosperous Iraq as outlined in our bilateral Strategic Framework Agreement with Iraq.
UPDATE: @SecPompeo "emphasized the importance of forming a moderate new Iraqi government, pursuant to the constitutional timeline, that is responsive to the expectations of the Iraqi people" in phone calls with #KRG @PMBarzani and #Iraq PM @HaiderAlAbadi
.@Kurdistan @PMBarzani and @StateDept @SecPompeo spoke in a phone call about some key issues of interest to US, Kurdistan and Iraq: the fight to defeat ISIS, government formation after the Iraqi elections, and protection of Yezidis and Christians who were victims of genocide
And . . .
The U.S. has become involved in three ongoing "failed state" wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. There is no purely military answer to any of them, writes CSIS’s Anthony Cordesman.
New content at THIRD:
- Truest statement of the week
- Truest statement of the week II
- A note to our readers
- Editorial: The basics
- TV: Another take on INSATIABLE
- David Brock is a public danger
- Why we call it CRAPAPEDIA (Ava and C.I.)
- Neoliberals, your old road is rapidly fading
- Read a book?
- Remember reality
- This edition's playlist
- Hirono Introduces Legislation to Protect Medicare ...
The following community sites -- plus NPR MUSIC, BLACK AGENDA REPORT and Cindy Sheehan -- updated:
I can't wait
45 seconds ago
The growing support for Socialism
11 minutes ago
Erykah Badu: Tiny Desk Concert
3 hours ago
Ranked voting
7 hours ago
We alwas have to pay
8 hours ago
