Saturday, July 28, 2007

Hominy Salad in the Kitchen

Labor Day usually means picnics and get togethers.

Or that's how it used to be. These days, it may just mean shopping. For those looking for an easy recipe Shondra e-mailed one she sampled on the 4th of July. She liked the taste but not the looks of it. That's because it contained yellow or white with a lot of green. She began substituting red bell pepper and likes the look better.

1 15.5 ounce can white or yellow hominy -- drained
1 red bell pepper chopped

1 small onion chopped
1 stalk of celery chopped
1/4 cup of olives chopped
1/4 cup of pickle relish
Dash of salt
Dash of pepper
1 cup of grated cheese
1/4 cup of olive oil

It is very important that you drain the hominy. It will be too salty otherwise and have too much of a gritty taste. You'll take all of the ingredients except the cheese and combine them in a bowl, cover it and chill in the fridge for at least 3 hours. Then top with cheese.

You can use green bell pepper but I agree the red looks better. You can use green and red bell pepper or green, red and yellow bell peppers. On olives, she uses black olives and sometimes also adds green ones.

This is a recipe that requires no cooking and is easy to toss together for a sidedish during the week. Since Shondra e-mailed it, we've had it during the week and I usually make it the night before and let it chill until dinner the next day.

I'm going to move on over to the YouTube debate and first let me agree with C.I. that the racist location for the 'debate' needs to be called out. Electing to hold the debate at an institution created to address a potential slave rebellion really isn't something Democrats ever need to do again.

C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" and my son Mike's "Dave Lindorff on impeachment, and me on Koo Koo" address the nonsense that is The Nation magazine rewriting what actually happened to make Obama look better than Clinton (David Corn at The Nation did not rewrite, he quotes the actual question and the remarks).

What I wanted to address was the alleged equality and the craven, disgusting non-bravery on display.

Anderson Cooper may be someone's cup of tea but I've never felt the need to be Grace in a Will & Grace scenario so he's never done anything for me. Anderson Cooper's sexuality was spoken of long before he went to CNN. If he's not gay, I think the world would be shocked. If he is gay, I think he's shameful for participating in a discussion or 'debate' where gay rights were pretty much trashed and all he could ever offer was indicating when time was up.

Here's the Corporatist Obama trying to explain his position on same-sex marriage:

Well, I think that it is important to pick up on something that was said earlier by both Dennis and by Bill, and that is that we've got to make sure that everybody is equal under the law. And the civil unions that I proposed would be equivalent in terms of making sure that all the rights that are conferred by the state are equal for same-sex couples as well as for heterosexual couples. Now, with respect to marriage, it’s my belief that it's up to the individual denominations to make a decision as to whether they want to recognize marriage or not. But in terms of, you know, the rights of people to transfer property, to have hospital visitation, all those critical civil rights that are conferred by our government, those should be equal.
Well, I think that it is important to pick up on something that was said earlier by both Dennis and by Bill, and that is that we've got to make sure that everybody is equal under the law. And the civil unions that I proposed would be equivalent in terms of making sure that all the rights that are conferred by the state are equal for same-sex couples as well as for heterosexual couples.
Now, with respect to marriage, it's my belief that it's up to the individual denominations to make a decision as to whether they want to recognize marriage or not. But in terms of, you know, the rights of people to transfer property, to have hospital visitation, all those critical civil rights that are conferred by our government, those should be equal.

Marriage is not just recognized by churches. As a woman who's been married for years, I'm fully aware the federal government recognizes it. It recognizes it when I file a joint-tax return or file on my own. It recognizes it in a variety of ways.

Obama wants to play like this is something being forced off on churches. It's not. The government recognizes marriage. He wasn't the only one being pathetic. John Edwards was pathetic as well. John Edwards and Elizabeth Edwards are close to pulling a GOP bait and switch. Those with long memories can remember all the Republican candidate wives over the years trotting out their "I am for abortion" while the husbands weren't. The wives don't matter in this instance, they aren't signing the legislation. Elizabeth Edwards has come out for gay marriage. Great on a personal level but it has nothing to do with the 2008 campaign. Her husband said in the debate he was against it and based that on religious reasons. That was cowardly.

Obama was far worse. He tried to 'finesse' the issue by pretending that civil unions and marriage are the same. They aren't. This society values marriage and, at best, accepts civil unions. Anyone who doesn't grasp the difference is either lying or an idiot.

Two people having the right to enter marriage is either a right or it isn't. There's nothing there to finesse. You either support the right of ALL couples to marry or you don't. (If you haven't grasped it, I do favor the right of all couples to marry.)

Obama is such a coward and you need to contrast his answer above with him speaking of women in the military. (For the record, Anderson Cooper did put the question to him by first noting interracial marriage was once banned. Obama chose not to speak to that.)

Here's the question, "Senator Obama, should women register for Selective Service?" Here's the answer from the Corporatist:

You know, a while back we had a celebration in the Capitol for the Tuskegee Airmen, and it was extraordinarily powerful because it reminded us, there was a time when African-Americans weren't allowed to serve in combat.
And yet, when they did, not only did they perform brilliantly, but what also happened is they helped to change America, and they helped to underscore that we’re equal.
And I think that if women are registered for service -- not necessarily in combat roles, and I don't agree with the draft -- I think it will help to send a message to my two daughters that they've got obligations to this great country as well as boys do.

So women have "obligations" and that allows for military service but gays and lesbians don't have rights that allow for equality?

He's such a little hate monger of his own. He ties it up in drippy words when he's playing his motivation speaker bit on the campaign trail but all he's doing there is offering racist screeds on African-American fathers.

It's not a surprise that the Koo Koo Katrina vanden Heuvel crowd would fall for Obama. He is them, a fake and a phoney. Someone who will not change a damn thing or challenge a damn thing.

Mike Gravel got cut off when he raised the issue of Obama's funding. Obama is back by corporations and lobbyists and I'm sure that fact sends Koo Koo Katrina vanden Heuvel into a tizzy everytime it's noted but that is reality.

On Iraq. Gravel, Kucinich and Bill Richardson are being realistic. Others, including Obama, are just lying.

Obama needs to be asked about withdrawal. He specificially needs to be asked why in 2004 (and videos are all over the web of this) he was saying the US couldn't withdrawal.

His public position is a LIE. He presents that he was against the illegal war before it began. Where he lies today is in refusing to tell the American people that once the illegal war started, he was against withdrawal and has repeatedly spoken out against it.

Now that 70% of Americans favor withdrawal, he keeps harping on the fact that he was against the illegal war before it started and trying to lump himself in with 70% of Americans but he has spoken out against withdrawal.

He's a liar and the Koo Koo Katrina crowd can praise him and pretend he's somehow different than Hillary Clinton but he's no better than she is.

If you missed it, the two year senator (sworn in Jan. 2005) made a fool out of himself by agreeing he would meet, if elected as president, in his first year with various foreign leaders. Hillary Clinton rightly rejected the idea that she'd agree on the stage that night to first year meetings. Koo Koo Katrina vanden Heuvel rewrote what happened and tried to make it a conspiracy that Hillary Clinton answered second. Koo Koo Katrina thinks that gave Hillary an unfair leg up. Apparently Koo Koo Katrina feels that it's a "ladies first" in a debate and Hillary must answer all questions before anyone else, even if the question is given to Obama first. John Nichols and Ari Berman also rewrote reality. (Only David Corn got the facts right.)

It's a sign of how unqualified their Dream Date is that Air, John and Koo Koo Katrina have to rewrite the facts to defend him. They can't defend the position he took, apparently, so they alter the facts of what he was asked and fudge his answer.

He knows nothing about diplomacy and he came off looking like he was running for class president and not president of the United States.

What the debate left me with was wanting to hear more from Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich. I also want to hear more from Bill Richardson. He is saying the right things but I'm not really comfortable with him due to the Clinton era. People can change and maybe he has.

I am the least familiar with Bill Richardson. I think the coming months will allow him to articulate his positions more. At which point, I will decide I've misjudged him initially, he changed or he just knows how to make pleasing statements. Mike Gravel is someone I was already familiar with before he decided to run. I'm very comfortable with the idea of him as president and think the nation would be lucky to have him. Dennis Kucinich continues to have my full support because he continues to be a thinking adult.

Joe Biden is a cringe and a grimace everytime he speaks. John Edwards needs to figure out why it's okay to discriminate based on some alleged Biblical teaching. I'm in Church every Sunday and he's not winning over this believer with his arguments. Hillary Clinton is the known evil to me and Barack Obama is the unknown evil. What he's got to offer is frightening and even more frightening is the crowd that's lined up to shield him from every blow he's brought upon himself.

Chris Dodd could increase his favorables or his negatives in either direction because he remains a cypher to me.

I hope I didn't forget anyone.

If there's someone you are for and you feel insulted, tell yourself, "Well I'm smarter than Trina." If you're strongly for someone because of their positions it may mean we have a difference of opinion or you see something I don't. But if you're for someone due to some cult of personality, I do disagree with you and would to your face. This isn't a popularity contest, it's about getting an adult into the White House.

Thank you to everyone who wrote about last week's post. I'm really glad to know there is so much support for war resisters. They are taking courageous stands and they are helping to end the illegal war. Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" from Friday:

Friday, July 27, 2007. Chaos and violence continue, the US military announces another death, Cindy Sheehan debates a moron, Operation Happy Talk continues.

Starting with war resisters. From
September 2nd through September 26th, Agustin Aguayo was absent without leave. Aguayo self-checked out when facing a second deployment to Iraq and while his case was moving through the civilian courts. Aguayo was denied CO status by a military that doesn't know their own regulations. John A. Rogowsky Jr. is another, among many others, who have been wrongly denied CO status. From "Selective Service System: Fast Facts:" "Beliefs which qualify a registrant for CO status may be religious in nature, but don't have to be." Despite that basic reality, Aguayo, Rogowsky and others have been told that they're not religious enough, that their religion is not recognized, when religion really is NOT required for CO status. In Aguayo's case, the military refused to recognize that time in Iraq deepened Aguayo's faith (already present when he enlisted).
Speaking with Don Bustany on
KPFK's Middle East in Focus Wednesday, Aguayo shared his story.and noted that when he arrived in Iraq in February of 2004, the medics were gathered for a speech that was in conflict in with the printed training material. They were told that they were medics and they were combat troops and that, "'You medics,' speaking to us, 'has to make it clear, has to make it clear in the minds of your infantry man that they must finish their job because if they don't then there will be more work for you'." As Aguayo looked around he saw acceptance and an eagerness to get back to the routine but "I could not accept that I was being told those things."
He also spoke of the eagerness to blame Iraqis for any problems as opposed to questioning the illegal war or the Bully Boy who sent them there. Aguayo began to realize, "I was a particiant, a supporter, of all the missions that took place." Today Aguayo is sharing his story publicly.
Mialka Bonadonna (LAist) reports he will be speaking tonight (Friday) in Los Angeles, 7:00 pm at 3303 Wilshire Blvd., 2nd floor.

There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Jared Hood and James Burmeister, Eli Israel, Joshua Key,
Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Joshua Key, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Jeremy Hinzman, Stephen Funk, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko, Brandon Hughey, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Care, Kyle Huwer, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, forty-one US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.

Information on war resistance within the military can be found at
The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline, Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. Tom Joad maintains a list of known war resisters.

From reality to Operation Happy Talk. The push-back is on and Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno has enlisted.
Ned Parker (Los Angeles Times) writes of the press briefing Odierno gave yesterday where he issued the talking points that US military deaths were falling. Parker rightly notes that seven deaths were announced after the press briefing and the one of the deaths announced on Thursday dated back to Sunday. The US military was delaying announcing deaths. Reality is that in terms of what has been annouced, the deaths were 67 on Thursday and that July is not yet over but July 2007 is already the deadliest July for US service members since the start of the illegal war. July 2006: 43 US service members were killed in Iraq. In July 2005 and July 2004, 54 US service members were killed in Iraq. In July 2003, 48 US service members were killed in Iraq.

Last week, Odierno enlisted in the push-back in a vareity of ways at a press briefing with reporters at the US Pentagon via video-link. In terms of downgrading expectations for the September report to the US Congress by the military, he declared that the report that was needed would come in November and clarified, "
What I was saying is -- again, my remarks were, in 45 days I will have a better idea if the trends are continuing, and that's September. Obviously, we have an assessment we will conduct in September that will provide -- that General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker will provide. I was not looking at extending that time frame when they have to report back. What I imagine we'll have to do is do assessments that follow that initial assessment in September, and that's -- I'm assuming we'll continue to do assessments while we're here." Yesterday, Odierno stressed "trends" as well but forgot to include 7 deaths he should have known about in his remarks.

In addition, at the same press briefing, he attempted to yet again sell the non-proven link between resistance fighters in Iraq and the Iranian government. When pressed by reporters for evidence, Odierno's confident remarks of such a link were replaced with his statements that, "
We don't see any evidence -- significant evidence". And a third way he enlisted was in calling into question the right of an open debate in a free society when he took to suggesting that discussions in the media and in the US Congress about US forces withdrawing from Iraq, was 'emboldening' al Qaeda. Again, when pressed, Odierno had to back off from his original remarks and admit he had "no specific intelligence" on any such emboldening.

Operation Happy Talk is not confined to the US military brass and the US administration.
Andrew Grice (Independent of London) reports that the UK Air Chief Marshal Jock Stirrup (I did not make that name up) has declared, "We are very close to being able to hand over Basra in my judgement. Just when we will reach that point is at the moment uncertain but I am fairly confident it'll be in the second half of the year." Basra is one base, the Basra Palace (and it's also the last of four provinces the British military currently controls -- the other three were already turned over) Grice interprets Jock Stirrup's remarks to mean control of Basra could be handed off before the year's end; however, it could come much sooner. After all, British troops, the Soldiers of the Queen's Royal Hussars, proved they could hustle when they pulled out of the Maysan province with less than 24 hours notice after their base their repeatedly was attacked back in August. As Haidar Hani (AP) reported then that following the British hitting the road in 'stripped down mode': "Looters ravaged a former British base Friday . . . taking everything from doors and window frames to corrugated roofing and metal pipes". Iraqi authorites noted then that the British had only given them 24 hours notice that the departure was coming. As with that base, the Basra Palace has been under rocket and mortar attacks repeatedly. In addition, IRIN reports that approximately "150 doctors in Basra, Iraq's second largest city about 600km south of Baghdad, began a three-day strike on 23 July, demanding the government protect them and their families." This was to call attention to the lack of security and this comes as over "618 medical employees" have been killed since the start of the illegal war.

Turning to realities that US administration prefers we don't know.
Noam N. Levey and Alexandra Zavis (Los Angeles Times) report that the White House "has stopped reporting to Congress a key quality-of-life indicator in Baghdad: how long the power stays on." This is an agreed upon 'benchmark' by the US administration and Congress -- and one even Iraqis could agree to even though they were consulted when it was time to draw on benchmarks. When you can't meet the benchmark, this administration stops reporting it.
This approach is an affront to democracy and one of many the current administration has repeatedly shown not only to people in the US but to people around the world. Today,
Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez (Democracy Now!) hosted a debate on the issue of impeachment. All sides were represented, with Cindy Sheehan representing the pro-impeachment and Dan Gerstein representing the lunatic fringe. Gerstein is a Democratic Party Hack and not even a good one. His full credentials were not listed on the program and that's probably due to the fact that if he'd had to sit through even a partial litany of his many losses, he would have walked off on air.

Gerstein doesn't want impeachment. He doesn't think anything that's been done rises to the level of impeachment. He thinks the way to 'fix' is to vote Democrats into power in 2008 (he might want to check out his consulting p.r. faxes because I'm seeing something about him being in favor of Democrats "all things being equal"). To impeach the Bully Boy and/or Cheney would be a distraction that would harm the Democrats chances to regain the White House in 2008.

Gerstein's been more wrong than right when gazing into his crystal ball and that may say it all but for those who've forgotten his nasty snit-fits when his boy Joe Lieberman lost the primary to Ned Lamont, try google-ing.

The reality, as Cindy Sheehan pointed out, is that impeachment hasn't been a problem in terms of the White House. Gerstein is wrong, Sheehan is right. Gerstein tried to use the 1998 Congressional election (not a White House election) as an example. After the 2002 Congressional election demonstrated that no patterns were holding, no tea leafs could be read, Gerstein might try sticking to reality and leaving his fantasy land where he knows the outcome. (If he truly did, he might be a player and not a Lieberman lackey.)

From the broadcast:

CINDY SHEEHAN: Well, also in Article II, yeah, Clause 4, it says for treason and bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors. I believe that -- and there's, you know, legal proof out there that when he commuted Scooter Libby's sentence, he committed treason, because Scooter Libby was convicted of obstructing justice in the cover-up of the Bush administration outing Valerie Plame. And I believe that the American people will be behind this. The Democrats aren't trying to end the war. They just gave George Bush $120 billion more to wage it. And he has said the troops aren't coming home while he's president. So I think we need to look at it as human-based and not political. John Conyers told me in a meeting previously to the one we had on Monday that winning the presidency in '08 was more important to him than ending the war in Iraq. When are our leaders going to -- I guarantee there's 150,000 mothers in this country, who it's more important to them to end the war in Iraq and get their children home safely than who's president in '08. And I think, historically, when this impeachment has been tried, like I said before, the party who tried it, even though it hasn't been successful, has -- it has galvanized the base of that party to say, "Wow, our leaders are courageous. Our leaders have integrity. Our leaders are leading us from a moral base, not from political expediency."

It was hilarious to see the Sterile Gerstein LIE and we'll use the word even though he will take offense but that is reality. A liar, for instance, is someone who attacks Cindy Sheehan as an attention hog (or whatever the term he used) only a short time ago but pretends to have the upmost respect for her during the debate today. The Peace Mom cleaned his clock.
In today's violence,
CNN reports that 17 Iraqis -- count includes 2 women -- were killed by the US military and the Iraqi military today in Karbala with hospital officials reporting at least twenty-five wounded ("including women and children") had been brought to the hospital. To no one's surprise the US military is claiming "Not true!" The US military asserts, in the same press release -- keep that in mind, that "No Iraqi civilians were present in the area while the strike was performed" -- the strike involved "aeiral fires" -- and that this was "a raid in a neighborhood in Karbala." One of those, no doubt, ghost town neighborhoods in Karbala? By their own admission, the raid took place in a neighborhood. The raid took place during the sleeping hours. The raid involved air strikes as well as shooting on the ground. And there is the matter of the bodies of the dead and the wounded.

Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a man was killed in a Baghdad bombing when the car he was driving was stopped by assailants who put "explosives into his car" and then attempted to use the man and his car in an attack on a police check point (two police officers were wounded), a Baghdad mortar attack that left four wounded, two people wounded when "U.S. troops bombed Al Husseiniya district" in Baghdad, an Al Muqdadiyah roadside bombing claimed 1 life with five others wounded, a Kirkuk rocket attack that claimed 2 lives, and a Karbala roadside bombing targeting Brig. Gen. Raed Shakir Hamed that left 3 of his bodyguards killed while he survived. Reuters notes a Mahmudiya mortar attack that claimed the life of 1 woman and left a child and an adult wounded, that a Samarra roadside bombing that claimed the lives of 7 police officers so . . .Shootings?

Reuters notes the Samarra police decided to open fire and 3 innocent civilians were killed (open fire after the bombing). Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports Saidiyah and Adeeb Abdul Salam were shot dead in a Baghdad home invasion, a person shot dead in Buhruz and attorney Hussam Al Nahi was shot dead in Basra. Reuters notes an Iraqi soldier shot dead in Kirkuk.Corpses?Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 7 corpses discovered in Baghdad, two corpses delivered to Al Muqdadiyah hospital, 1 corpse discovered in Baquba. KUNA reports the corpses of five women were discovered in Mosul today and that the women had been kidnapped yesterday while returning from work.

Today, the
US military announced: "One Task Force Lightning Soldier died as a result of injuries sustained from an explosion near his vehicle while conducting operations in Diyala province, Thursday." The death brings ICCC's current total to 3646 US service members killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war with 67 killed for the month thus far.