Suzette's daughter is in first grade and Suzette's focusing on the upcoming class Halloween party. She's already put in for time off at work so she can be there as one of the parents helping out and she e-mailed that she really wants to bring brownies but she's never made them.
I'm going to share the easiest recipe I know (with an addition) but also share, as I did in my e-mail to Suzanne, that if you're making brownies from scratch for the first time and worried, there are many brownie mixes available in stores. If it's your first time fixing them from scratch and you're concerned about serving them to others, I strongly suggest that, in addition to the ingredients need for the recipe that follows, you buy a mix as a back up in case something goes wrong (for instance, burns).
For this recipe you need:
1 stick of butter
2 squares of UNSWEETENED chocolate
1 cup of sugar
1/2 teapsoon of vanilla
1/4 cup all-purpose flour
1/4 teaspoon salt
1 individual king-size M&Ms
Melt the stick of butter and 2 squares of UNSWEETENED chocolate in a saucepan. You need to stir repeatedly or it will burn. As soon as it's melted, turn off the burner and move to the saucepan to a cool burner. If you're nervous about burning, you can actually take it off the hot burner before it's competely melted. When 2/3s of the mixture is melted, you can take it off the heat and stir it repeatedly which will combine the hot sections with the cool and melt the rest. (Suzette says she has a tendency to burn everything on first try.) If you're in a panic, put the mixture in a microwaveable glass/plastic container and heat for thirty second bursts, stirring after each burst, until the mixture is melted.
Once the mixture is melted, stir in a cup of sugar, two eggs (crack them and drop in the mixture, you're not whipping these before they go in) and a 1/2 teaspoon of vanilla. I have a mixer but I never use it for it brownies. It's too much work to clean the bowl and attachments so I just stir by hand.
To this mixture, add 1/4 cup all-purpose flour and 1/4 teaspoon salt and continue to mix. Once upon a time, I'd add walnuts here but five of my eight children ended up anti-walnuts. (They'll eat them by themselves but don't care for them in brownies.) So instead I began adding M&Ms here to give the brownies a crunch. This is where you add the M&Ms and stir.
You're not using a big bag of M&Ms. This is the "King Size" indiviual item on the candy aisle with other candy bars, not hanging from a hook with the pound bag, et al. If you use the regular individual size, you'll need three of those. And check because sometimes there's a sale that will make the three individual servings cheaper than the one king size.
Pour the mixture into a floured 8-inch square pan and bake at 325 degrees for forty minutes. Take the pan out of the oven and allow to cool before cutting into squares.
There's another reason for the M&Ms, Suzette's fixing this for a school. Brownies are chocolate. M&Ms are chocolate. Anyone eating a brownie knows they are getting chocolate so you haven't added an ingredient that someone might be allergic to. No parent will say, "Those look great, I wish you hadn't put ___ in because my child can't have ___."
However, some people can't eat chocolate. It's not your job to provide an item that every child can eat. But if you're part of the planning stage, as Suzette is, your job does include being aware of food allergies, diabetes and other issues. There should be enough of a vareity in what is offered that every child can enjoy something. Like Suzette, I always signed up for my children's parties and enjoyed every one of them (well, almost every one . . .). There were two diabetic children in classes early on. For those, I always suggested sugar free candy or sweets. However, when Mike was in second grade, a classmate with diabetes had parents who had made the decision not to utilize sugar free sweets because they felt that could lead to an aquired taste that would lead to temptation when they (the parents) weren't around.
So, if you're part of the planning group, never think, "Oh, there's someone with diabetes, so make sure you've got sugar free sweets." Check with a parent of the child first to make sure that they do allow their child sugar free sweets.
Another note of caution. Supervision is important. When one of my daughters came down with strep, I had to bail on a class party and I've always seen that as a blessing. I wasn't there. Why? A dish of nuts was on the table. There was a child with a peanut allegery and another child thought it would be funny to sneak a peanut into the child's sandwich. The child ended up in the emergency room. If I had been there, I might have been like the other parents present and not noticed. So I'm glad I wasn't there. (I had a replacement so my not being there hadn't left them empty handed or I would feel guilty about that to this day.)
I wouldn't put out nuts. I wouldn't put out a fresh fruit if a child in the class was allergic to it. Once the kids start digging in, everything is at risk of getting mixed together or moved around.
There are a lot of food allergies and, if you're a parent responsible for helping plan the party, it's your job to know what those allergies are. Mike's allergic to strawberries. He wouldn't have to go to the emergency room, but he would break out in hives. (Actually, the doctor said he'd grow out of it and he may have by now. The memory of the hives is so great that he's always avoided fresh strawberries.) So, to use that as an example, if a parent brought strawberries, it's not enough that Mike didn't eat any. A child could get the juice on their hands or on napkins or whatever else and then touch Mike and we'd have hives. More likely, they'll touch a toy while they're eating it and the toy will be passed on.
So if there's an issue like that, it's better to cut out the item then to assume that it will only be picked up by those wanting to eat it and no one else will be effected. Because I had eight kids, I usually knew a number of the families in each class so I'd have a heads up to allegeries and food issues from previous parties. But I would always check with them as well as the parents of students I didn't know as well. Most schools keep a record of allergies and health issues but not everything gets noted. Sometimes, when you're filling out that information, there's not time to note everything and you may think, "Oh, ___ will never be served at school anyway." That's not always true when it comes to parties. So make sure you're aware of what is allowed and what isn't for each child. With my youngest in high school now, my school party days are over.
But here are a few things I learned over the years. (Sometimes learned the hard way.)
If a child tells you they can have something and you're thinking the parent had stated they couldn't, the parent probably did tell you their child couldn't have it. Kids like a lot of things that will hurt them.
The first diabetic child I ever encountered would swear to me, year after year from K through fifth grade, that he really was allowed sweets "just one." He wasn't. But all the other kids were grabbing them.
For that reason and others, try to make a point to eat something, in a public way, that has been specifically brought for one child or one segment of children. "He can only have the crackers, ha ha!" won't get said by any other kids, if you're eating the crackers (or whatever) yourself. You'd be surprised how many children are following what the other students are eating. Also, by eating something publicly, you may encourage other children to sample it.
No one leaves until they've helped clean up something. My second oldest daughter hated the fact that I helped out because it meant that she would have to pick up (because we'd be among the last to leave). Everyone needs to learn that their party means they take part in the clean up. If X arrives to pick up their child early (which usually happens on party days), give the a child a task to do, something as simple as throwing away their plate, if nothing else.
I never felt sorry for my second oldest daughter (though I did tire of her complaining about it) but I did feel sorry for the kids who were always the last to leave. There was always one group and I'm sure they are among the tidiest people in the country today. But it's not fair to them, or to the ones who are left with the impression that you eat, play and dash out, that one group always gets stuck with cleaning.
No matter how a parent may say "We've got to go!" they don't have to go at that minute. Short of health emergency, they don't have to go at that moment. There is enough time for a child to throw away their cup and plate. This was usually only a problem if one parent usually picked them on up but, on a party day, another parent showed up. A father who regularly picks up their child knows that it's rare that you walk in and immediately leave. If a parent shows up and is instructing their child to "Hurry up!" -- you can easily add, "Yes, throw away your plate and gather your things."
If every child helps with one small bit, the clean up required when only a few children are left is much less and it also teaches responsibility.
Your beautiful punch bowl, passed on down through your family, has no place at a children's party. That's true of any item. But I do remember a mother who had to excuse herself after the broken glass had been cleaned up to go have a cry. Never bring any container or dish that can't be lost or broken. I wouldn't suggest glass anything. But there is usually one parent, usually who's planning on being present for the entire party, who is sure that it won't break. The same applies to tablecoths and you should use plastic ones, not cloth.
If you're amazed by how much a child eats, keep that thought to yourself. You may think you can whisper it to another parent but some child will hear and it will get back. This is their party and you're not there to play Joan and Melissa Rivers, you're there to be sure that no fights break out and everyone has a chance to enjoy themselves.
The same goes for any personal detail about your own life. If you don't feel like announcing to the class that you're, for instance, getting a divorce, don't whisper it to another parent. Just as something will always get broken or lost, something will always be overheard.
Hopefully, at least one of the tips will help someone.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Friday, October 6, 2006. Chaos and violence continue in Iraq, war resister Darrell Anderson is headed home (he returned to the United States, turned himself in at Fort Knox on Tuesday, now he's headed home), World Can't Wait staged protests across the United States on Thursday, the Danish military suffers a fatality in Iraq, the US military notes a death toll on Iraqi police officers but continues to look the other way with regards to violence toward Iraqi women, and Bob Watada, father of war resisterer Ehren Watada, continues his second speaking tour to raise awareness on his son.
Starting with war resister Darrell Anderson. In April of 2004, Anderson was injured by a roadside bomb in Iraq and awarded a Purple Heart. Returning to the US and learning he would be redeployed to Iraq, Anderson elected to self-check out of the military in January 2005 and move to Canada. Anderson spoke out publicly against the war while in Canada, attempted to win refugee status (something the Canadian government has refused all war resisters), met Gail Greer, married her in February 2006 but decided to return to the United States. On Saturday, he crossed the Peace Bridge back into the US and, on Tuesday, he turned himself in at Fort Knox. Jim Warren (Lexington Herald-Leader) reports that Jim Fennerty, Anderson's attorney, states Darrell Anderson "was released from Fort Knox this morning and is on his way home". AP reports that Anderson "is expected to be discharged without a court-martial".
While some resist war, US Secretary of State Condi Rice incites it. Rice was in Baghdad on Thursday where -- as Robin Wright (Washington Post), Philp Shenon (New York Times) and CBS and AP reported -- her plane had to circle the airport for approximately forty minutes due to mortar and rocket attacks. Not aimed at her, mind you, such is the state of Baghdad that Rice's unnannounced visit didn't effect what's become life as usual. From there, on Friday, Condi headed to the Kurdish region, which is oil rich, and, as AFP reports, made noises about sharing the wealth with Massud Barzani (regional president). She was so busy that the meeting in London among "world powers" had to be delayed two hours, Thomas Wagner (AP) reports which left "leaders little time to reach a consensus and making it unlikely." If the decision on sanctions has been delayed, a detour's been created in Bully Boy's march to war on Iran meaning, possibly, citizens around the world should pray that Condi has many more unexpected layovers. (Update on this by Sophie Walker of Reuters.)
As Wright (Washington Post) noted, Rice's visit began as the Kurdish parliamentarian Mohammed Ridah Sinkawi was assassinated. As Shenon (New York Times) noted, the visit with Iraqi president Jalal Talabani took place "in the dark" after "the lights went out . . . It was a reminder of the city's erratic -- and sometimes nonexistant -- electrical service." Along with electrical problems, Rice visit occurred as Xinhua reported that: "Toxic water in the Tigris river killed thousands of fish and birds in Iraq's Salahudin province . . . The provincial water directorate, which produces drinking water for people in this area, ordered all its projects to suspend working and wait for the tests' results". Three years after the illegal war began and they can't even keep the lights on the fortified Green Zone of Baghdad, nor can they address the issue of the Tigris which provides "drinking water supplies for millions of Iraqis."
Today, CNN reports Joseph Paterson ("commander in charge of police training in Iraq") announced that "Since September 2004 . . . about 4,000 [police] officers have been killed and 8,000 injured". And of course, as AFP reported earlier, between 800 and 1,200 police officers are being retrained after they were thought to be complicit in the mass kindappings from earlier this week. What the US military refuses to talk about is women in Iraq. Nabeel Ziriqi (Al Jazeera) reported earlier this week: "A recent spike in attacks on women has forced many in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul to retreat into their homes or resort to armed escort by relatives and tribal guards. In recent weeks, Mosul residents have witnessed an unprecedented rise in the number of female corpses found throughout the city. Alaa al-Badrani said her friend, a school principal, was kidnapped from her home in the Bakr district of the city by an armed gang."
Bahrain News Agency reports that a roadside bomb targeted "a US military patrol . . . passing by in Husaiba to the est of the Iraqi city of Ramadhi." No word on any casualities or fatalities. AFP reports mortar rounds wounded seven in Baghdad. Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) reports a "double bombing" that first "set the generator ablaze, then when firefighters and others rushed in, the second went off" resulting in one death and four injured.
KUNA reports that Denmark's 500 troops serving in Iraq are now 499 as a soldier, injured in an "armed confrontation" in southern Iraq, died as he was being transported to a hospital.
Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) reports seven corpses discovered "floating in the area of Suwayrah". AFP reports that Baghdad police discovered 35 corpses in the capital in the last 24 hours.
This comes as the puppet of the occupation, Nouri al-Malki's little examined 4-part 'peace' plan continues to be hailed by an unquestioning press. One not hailing it is Firas Al-Atraqchi (Al-Ahram Weekly) who notes of the first plank -- 'security committees': "The committees would monitor whether police and the Iraqi army effectively pursue militia fighters after an attack. But the plan falls far short of any significant effort to curb violence because it does not address the disarming of militias, which Maliki had promised in late May, and focuses entirely on Baghdad. The rest of the country, it seems, can go to hell."
Meanwhile IRIN reports a slight improvement for the life of prisoners in Iraqi prisons just as AP reports that: "Guards at Guantanamo Bay bragged about beating detainees and described it as common practice, a U.S. Marine sergeant said in a sworn statement". (If you're confused as to the connection between Guantanamo and Iraq, on today's KPFA's Living Room, Kris Welch presented some recorded footage of Janis Karpinski explaining the efforts to "Gitmo-ize" Abu Ghraib.)
In legal news, AP reports that the trial of Pendleton Eight, accused of shooting an unarmed Iraqi dead after dragging from his Hamdaniya home, included testimony today from one of the eight, Melson J. Bacos, who testified "he saw two Marines fire at least 10 rounds into 52-year-old Hashim Ibrahim Awad". AP reports that Bacos, a medic, "pleaded guilty to kidnapping and conspiracy charges" in the death of Awad.
Reuters reports that Bacos tetified Lawrence Hutchins III had devised a plan for another Iraqi (one who had been in and out of Abu Ghraib) but, when unable to locate that man, they went after Hashim Ibrahim Awad who happened to live next door to the Iraqi Hutchins had intended they kidnap and kill.
Meanwhile, in London, AFP reports that an inquest into the death of ITN reporter Terry Lloyd heard testimony from Nicholas Walshe who stated Lloyd "was shot in the head by US troops as he was driven away from a gunfight". As the BBC noted, March 23, 2003, Terry Lloyd "has not been seen since he and three colleagues came under fire as [they] were on the road to the city of Basra." The Guardian of London reports that, in addition, a British solider testified "he saw a US tank open fire on the ITN team's vehicles" and that this was "the first public acknowledgement that British forces witnessed the events of March 22, 2003, in which Mr. Lloyd and his interpreter Huseein Osman died and his French cameraman Fred Nerac went missing near Basra in southern Iraq."
Frederic Nerac remains missing and Reporters Without Borders notes that "British defence ministry opened an investigation in June 2003 into their [Nerac and Hussein Osman] disappearance at the insistence of Nerac's wife Fabienne and press freedom organisations including Reporters Without Borders."
Will Dunham (Reuters) reports that "signs of wear and tear on the U.S. military" has resulted from Iraq and Afghanistan and that "Many troops are facing second and third long combat tours and less time between overseas deployments." Or none at all. A point Laurie Loving makes very clear on page 2 of The Nation's October 16, 2006 issue. Loving, a member of Military Families Speak Out, opens her letter with the following: "My son is in the 172nd Stryker Brigade (Army). It recently had its one-year deployment to Iraq extended while in the midst of deploying back to the United States. He is one of the 400 soldiers who had made it back to Fairbanks, Alaska. A few days later he was informed that he was going to be sent back to Iraq. His brigade has been sent to Baghdad to save the occupation."
In US congressional news, John Nolen (CBS) covers Republican Senator John Warner's reaction to this week's visit to Iraq: "In two or three months, if this thing hasn't come to fruition and if this level of violence is not under control . . . I think it's the responsibility of our government, internally to determine: Is there a change in course that we should take? And I wouldn't take off the table any option at this time." This as AFP reports on Republican Senator Chuck Hagel's trip to Vietnam which found him drawing some comparisons to Iraq and Vietnam and declaring "War should always be a last resort." Reporting on the other side of the aisle, Gregg K. Kakesako (Honolulu Star-Bulletin) notes that Democratic "U.S. House Reps. Neil Abercrombie and John Murtha say President Bush will have to mobilize all members of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve -- including 3,000 Hawaii citizen soldiers -- for an indefinite period. There are not enough active-duty military to handle the current level of violence in Iraq, the two Democrats said yesterday. That would affect Army National Guard units like Hawaii's 29th Brigade Combat Team, which currently is not supposed to be mobilized for six years since returning from Iraq this year."
In peace news, across the United States people participated in demonstrations, rallies and marches as part of the World Can't Wait actions. Whethere the turnout was ten people or in the hundreds, all demonstrations made a difference, had an impact and was made up of people willing to stand up. We're going to note some of the events, not all. Over 200 locations took part and what follows is a sample of some events reported by the press.
The Reno Gazette-Journal reports that an estimated 40 people turned out in Reno, carrying signs that read "Vote for change," "I believe in our Constitution, why doesn't Bush?," "Where is the plan?" and U.S. Out of Iraq." Adam Leech (Portsmouth Herald) reports that at least fifty turned out in Portsmouth, Maine and he quotes Vietnam vet Brian Vawter saying, "I think we're all pretty fed up with what's going on iwth the decline of our rights and the direction this country is going. People have a need to express themselves directly because their view isn't being expressed by either partly in Washington right now." Sam Shawver (Marietta Times) reports that ten people turned out in Marietta, Ohio and quotes two: James Gawthrop stating, "I just learned about worldcantwait.net a few days ago, but my hands were shaking over the 'torture bill' Congress passed last Thursday. Now the Bush administration can detain anybody suspected of being a terrorist indefinitely. They can use secret evidence to hold you. They can even use torture"; and Janie Poe who wore a CODEPINK t-shirt to the demonstration stating, "I've been talking with many young people, and I'm impressed. Listen to young people. They're very concerned about their future, and they're very informed." [Poe urged people to support Amnesty USA and speak out against torture.] In the previous, that's a hundred people who stood up (more if press estimates are off).
In Florida, John Simpson (Bradenton Herald) reports that 150 people turned out in Sarasota to demonstrate and quotes Naomi Nye: "People are fed up. The tide is definitely turning." Simpson also notes 82-year-old Sara Dick who stated, "We're in even more danger (now). In some areas, there are more rights, but we're always slipping and sliding backwards." Christian Hill (The Olympian) reports that an estimated 300 people gathered in Olympia, Washington and quotes college student Brandon Franz stating, "The people of America are supposed to have the voice in what's done, not the ruling elite" and Kirsten Anderson who states, "I'm doing this for my grandchildren. I'm a little old to have it be for me, and it's the ones comping up that I care about. It's their country, too, especially now." Summer Banks (Yale Daily News) reports that an estimated 60 people participated near campus and notes one was "[l]ocal resident and self-proclaimed Republican housewife Monica McGovern" who stated, "I am calling for Bush to step down or for Congress to impeach him. I would like to see him indicted for war crimes." Beth Freed (Dallas Morning News) reports that an estimated forty people participated in Lewisville, Texas resulting in "slowed southbound traffic on Interstate 35E . . . . Many commuters honked in support of the peace demonstrators outside the office of U.S. Rep. Michael Burgess, while others slowed to express their disagreement" and quotes Nikki Henderson stating, "We as Americans should not tolerate decisions like last week's legislation. It allows Bush to interpret the Geneva Conventions on his own."
Big or small turnouts, people stood up. They stopped their normal day to speak out.
Louis Medina (The Bakersfield California) reports an estimated seventy-five activists were particiapting by the end of the events and quotes college student Araceli Aguilar stating, "I came here to protest the Bush administration. I don't agree with what they're doing. I don't agree with the war, which they said is over, yet we still have our troops there and they're dying." Melissa Nix (The Free Lance Star) reports that, in Fredericksburg, Virginia, an estimated two dozen students of the University of Mary Washington participated and quotes college student Jason Walsh who held 268 pages listing the names of American troops who had died in Iraq, "That's a small book. It's a waste, because no one's going to read it. No one cares about these soldiers except their families." OregonLive reports that a little less than 400 people participated in Portland's march. In Santa Fe, New Mexico, Lubna Takruri (AP) reports that "dozens" turned out and the mayor, David Coss, spoke to the group.
A mayor, students, retired people, those who work in the home, those who work outside it (and those working outside frequently also work inside), a wide range of people took part. Patrick Flanigan (Rochester Democrat and Chronicle) reports that an estimated "150 people gathered in downtown Rochester [New York] on Thursday to protest President Bush's handling of the war on terror and the mounting death toll in Iraq" and quotes Donna Mummery: "Our country is about to embark on a very dangerous course. By taking to the streets on a work day, you are saying enough is enough." Also in New York, Alice Hunt (Poughkeepsie Journal) reports that activists gathered in New Paltz and quotes Josh Schulman stating, "Our first step is to initiate that dialogue and permeat the mass media with the message Bush does not speak for many Americans." While in NYC, Chelsea Cooley (Washington Square News) reports: "Hundreds of protesters packed the streets yesterday, marching 33 blocks from the United Nations building at First Avenue and 47th Street to Union Square, chanting their message: 'Drive out the Bush regime!'"
In one of the largest reported turnouts, Emma Graves Fitzsimmons, Brendan McCarthy and Rudy Bush (Chicago Tribune) report that an estimated 1,500 people turned out in Chicago and quotes college student Rebecca Miller on skipping class to attend, "It's just one class. I can always make up the homework. This is more important." and Thyandrea Adams who shut down her business to be present, "I told them not to come into work today. This is a day that's important. It was worth it to show support from our community." In Seattle, Mike Barber (Seattle Post-Intelligencer) reports "several hundreds" turned out and Barber quotes Patricia Thompson who brought "her 82-year-old father" because, "He is horrified at the mess they made of Iraq. Weapons of mass destruction was a snow job. We never finished in Afghanistan. It's an absolute shambles of incompetency and profiteering."
In San Francisco, Dennis Bernstein and Nora Barrows Friedman covered the event for
KPFA's Flashpoints on Thursday (broadcast archived -- if you can listen online, you can hear it for free), Charles Slay (San Francisco Indybay Media) has created a photo essay, and John Koopman, Patrick Hoge and Marisa Lagos (San Francisco Chronicle) report on the "hundres" (it was well over a thousand) and notes 17-year-old Jessica Cussins, among the many who left campuses to attend, stating, "I felt that this was more useful. I wanted to be part of it. I think what we're doing (in Iraq) is wrong." Alice Walker is quoted stating: "I just want the children to know that some of the elders are with them, and that we're very happy they are speaking out and saving their own lives by resisting the Bush regime." [You can also check out Mike's "Blue Angels buzzing rally and power cut (San Francisco)" which relays Jess reporting via cellphone.]
Ehren Watada was not in Salem, Oregon yesterday but he was remembered. Tim King (Salem-News) reports that among those participating in their local World Can't Wait demonstrations ("between 75 and 100") was Reed Elder who urged that everyone check out Ehren Watada's website and that other "soldiers who also don't agree withe the direction of the nation" should be speaking out.
Bob Watada, Ehren's father, is now on his second speaking tour to raise awareness of his son who is the first US officer to publicly refuse to serve in the illegal war. Some of the upcoming events include:
Sat 10/7 2:00-4:00 pm Welcome Reception for Bob Watada
JACCC Garden Room, 244 S. San Pedro St., Los Angeles
Contact: NCRR 213-680-3484, email: email@example.com.
Sun 10/8 2:00-5:00 pm Forum with Bob Watada
Nat'l Center for the Preservation of Democracy, 111 N. Central Ave., Los Angeles.
Contact Ellen Endo 213-629-2231 or Mo 323-371-4502
Sun 10/8 6:00-8:00 pm An Evening of Discussion and Learning hosted by Rev. Phyllis Tyler
11326 CherryLee Dr., El Monte (Rev. Tyler is Senior Pastor of Sage Granada Park United Methodist Church in Alhambra) Co-sponsored by NCRR and the National Japanese American United Methodist Church Caucus
Contact: NCRR 213-680-3484 email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Mon 10/9 7:00pm Veterans for Peace (Chapter 112) and Citizens for Peaceful Resolution
E.P. Foster Library, Topping Rm. 651, E. Main St., Ventura
Contact: Michael Cervantes 805-486-2884 email: email@example.com
Wed 10/100 7:00-9:45 pm CSULB Asian American and Chicano & Latino Studies Classes
Dr. John Tsuchida and Dr. Juan Benitez
1250 Bellflower Bl, Long Beach
Thurs 10/12 6:00 pm Whittier Area Coalition for Peace & Justice, Mark Twain Club Potluck
($3 donations) Bob speaks at 7:00 pm. First Friends Church of Whittier, 12305 E. Philadelphia St., Whittier
Contact: Robin McLaren 562-943-4051 email: firstname.lastname@example.org
A full schedule, in PDF form, can be found here. More information on Ehren Watada can be found at ThankYouLt.org. and information on all known war resisters can be found at Courage to Resist.
the third estate sunday review
mikey likes it
nora barrows friedman
world cant wait
kris welchliving room