Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Chicken with Peach-Avocado Salsa in the Kitchen

 Michelle e-mailed to note Taste of Home's recipe for Chicken with Peach-Avocado Salsa:


Ingredients

  • 1 medium peach, peeled and chopped
  • 1 medium ripe avocado, peeled and cubed
  • 1/2 cup chopped sweet red pepper
  • 3 tablespoons finely chopped red onion
  • 1 tablespoon minced fresh basil
  • 1 tablespoon lime juice
  • 1 teaspoon hot pepper sauce
  • 1/2 teaspoon grated lime zest
  • 3/4 teaspoon salt, divided
  • 1/2 teaspoon pepper, divided
  • 4 boneless skinless chicken breast halves (6 ounces each)  


Directions

For salsa, in a small bowl, combine peach, avocado, red pepper, onion, basil, lime juice, hot pepper sauce, lime zest, 1/4 teaspoon salt and 1/4 teaspoon pepper.     

Sprinkle chicken with remaining 1/2 tsp. salt and 1/4 tsp. pepper. On a lightly greased grill rack, grill chicken, covered, over medium heat 5 minutes. Turn; grill until a thermometer reads 165°, 7-9 minutes longer. Serve with salsa.     

That really sounds delicious.  I'm planning to try the recipe on Saturday. 

News?  Ja'han Jones (MS NOW) reports:

Donald Trump has inadvertently created a physical swamp that serves as a potent metaphor for his administration’s corruption and incompetence. 

The man who popularized the phrase “drain the swamp” as a vow to rid politics of corruption has failed to live up to his word. Meanwhile, his failed attempt to beautify the Reflecting Pool in Washington, D.C., has become the perfect epitome of the president’s ability to deliver funds to his friends at taxpayers’ expense. 

As my colleague Steve Benen wrote in April, Trump called the Reflecting Pool “dirty” and “filthy” en route to awarding one of his associates a no-bid contract to beautify it. But just days after the job was completed, at a cost of more than $14 million, algae is in full bloom throughout the pool, giving it the look of a Florida swamp. 

Experts warned The New York Times last month that an algae bloom was likely if the administration didn’t take proper steps to improve the pool’s pipe and filter system. And those concerns have been realized despite an expensive effort to mitigate the problem, as you can tell from a DC News Now report featuring angry D.C. visitors.


He is such a moron.  A huge moron.  

This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot" for Monday: 

Monday, June 15, 2026.  Chump's 'big' b-day bash is a whimper, even he knows it and takes to posting about Democrats in the early morning hours, Hegseth tries to lie to CBS NEWS, and much more. 




In the video above, Ben breaks down the deal with Iran and last night's ridiculous nonsense at the White House.  

The deal?  Not yet in place and nothing to brag about.  It's much weaker than what was in place, what Barack Obama had negotiated.  Jennifer Bowers Bahney (MEDIAITE) notes that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth appeared on CBS' FACE THE NATION yesterday to lie about it

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed on CBS News’s Face The Nation Sunday that the United States has controlled the Strait of Hormuz during the entire Iran war, despite the U.S. still having to negotiate for Iran to re-open the strait.

“You had 45 days of overwhelming combat, which Iran could not manage,” Hegseth said. “Their navy is gone, air force gone, air defenses. It led to a blockade, which was impenetrable for a couple of months. Now you have the underground Project Freedom, which allowed 25 million barrels of oil to transit the strait, to show that we control the strait. And then we did two more days of bombing, because they weren’t really coming to the table. So it’s been military pressure and strength from President Trump that has compelled Iran to this deal, which will be performance-based when it’s signed shortly.”

“Right, but we are not at that deal yet,” said moderator Margaret Brennan.  “We are not even at the memorandum. That’s what we are waiting on being signed today.”

Trump has claimed repeatedly that the U.S. and Iran would sign a Memorandum of Understanding Sunday to pave the way for future talks on Iran’s nuclear enrichment program. The M.O.U. also calls for a 60-day ceasefire and for Iran to immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

“So, tomorrow you will end the blockade?” Brennan asked.



But apart from extending the ceasefire and pledging to begin talks, the memorandum of understanding (MOU) supposed to be signed in the hours ahead does not actually address any of the key objectives laid out by the president, Hegseth and other U.S. officials for the war effort beyond re-opening the Strait of Hormuz. The two sides are set to continue negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program, while other stated objectives like seeking out regime change or ending Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities remain unachieved.

Adding to the issue for the White House is the fatigue many Americans and many especially in Washington are feeling as countless promises from top officials that the war will end in days or weeks have fallen by the wayside and the Iran War approaches the end of its fourth month as a conflict.

Reports indicate that the deal will not be signed at a signing ceremony, but rather over a digital meeting.

Other reports indicated Sunday that Iranian officials had not committed to signing the agreement. Iran’s foreign minister also insisted on Friday that dissolution of Iran’s nuclear material would have to occur within Iran’s borders.


Hegseth wasn't qualified for the job and it took JD Vance casting a vote for Hegeth to be carried across the line to the position of Secretary of Defense.  

David Wippman and Glenn C. Altschuler (THE HILL) review several of Chump's many unqualified nominees:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vaccine skeptic with no background in public health administration, now runs the nation’s health agencies. 

Kash Patel, who lacked any senior law enforcement experience and vowed to “shut down the FBI Hoover Building on day one,” heads the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The same pattern recurs throughout the executive branch. 

Trump chose Steve Witkoff, a golf buddy and real estate developer with no diplomatic experience, to manage a huge portfolio: negotiations with Russia, Iran and the Middle East. Even administration insiders were appalled to learn that Witkoff held high-level meetings with Russian officials by himself, sometimes relied on Kremlin translators, and apparently coached a senior Russian official on how best to manage Trump.

A member of Trump’s first administration described Witkoff as “a bumbling f—ing idiot” who “should not be doing this alone.” Two weeks ago, Russia made clear it was tired of Witkoff’s periodic visits and preferred a diplomatic process with knowledgeable working groups and regular meetings.

After forcing out a career prosecutor who found insufficient evidence to indict former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, Trump installed Lindsay Halligan — a 36-year-old insurance lawyer with no prosecutorial experience — as the interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Halligan quickly indicted Comey and James but made “fundamental misstatements of the law” in presenting the Comey case to the grand jury. A federal judge appointed by Trump ruled her appointment unlawful and dismissed both cases. When she refused to leave office, a second judge ordered her to stop “masquerading as the United States Attorney.”

Last June, Trump named Paul Ingrassia, a 30-year-old activist who graduated from law school in 2022 and was admitted to the New York bar in 2024, to lead the Office of Special Counsel — the agency charged with protecting government whistleblowers and enforcing restrictions on partisan political activity by government employees.  

By law, that position must go to someone “especially qualified.” Ingrassia’s apparent qualifications included serving as a far-right podcast host and a brief stint as White House liaison to the Justice Department, where he pushed to hire only candidates showing “exceptional loyalty” to Trump. After it emerged that Ingrassia had made a series of racist remarks and admitted to having a “Nazi streak,” Republican support evaporated and Ingrassia’s nomination was withdrawn. Trump then appointed him acting general counsel of the General Services Administration, an organization with more than 10,000 employees.

These are not isolated examples. Although he claims to appoint only “top, top people,” Trump has set modern records for withdrawn nominations, turnover among senior officials, and appointments of judges the American Bar Association deems unqualified. 


And then there's Miss Sassy, the original disappointment, JD Vance.  Amanda Marcotte (SALON) observes:

JD Vance is famously addicted to social media, to a degree that one wonders if he has any job duties as vice president at all. It’s almost certain that he’s well aware that the late Charlie Kirk has not become the movement martyr MAGA hoped for. On the contrary, the memory of the Turning Point USA founder has become a joke on social media. The cringeworthy efforts to deify Kirk are irresistible bait for online jokesters, who spent months turning his image and even an AI-generated song about him into fuel for irony-drenched memes mocking the deceased right-wing leader. Trying to shove Kirk on the public backfired for MAGA, causing most people to rebel with mockery.

But even though most Republicans have quietly moved on, Vance is still hoping to get enough juice out Kirk’s death to sell books. In early June, the Wall Street Journal published an excerpt from Vance’s latest memoir, “Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith,” which is officially released tomorrow. In it, Vance credits Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk — who is even more hated than her dead husband — for convincing his wife, Usha Vance, to have a fourth child. No, it’s not as a response to the embarrassingly intimate hug Erika Kirk and JD Vance shared at a TPUSA event last November, despite online gossip speculating otherwise. Instead, the vice president claims “Erika told Usha between sobs that she regretted having only two kids with Charlie,” and that’s what changed his wife’s mind.

It’s hard to oversell how nauseating the entire excerpt is, especially since it’s replete with Vance’s overbearing efforts to inject religious language into every beat of his story about his allegedly great friendship with Kirk. It’s hard to read sentences like, “Charlie taught me to love all parts of our Christian communion,” while imagining Vance’s voice, especially as his only gear as a public speaker is to use a snide tone, even when talking about his supposed higher aspirations. But these are granular annoyances. The real question is why did Vance choose a passage about Kirk, who is beyond old news, as a represenation of a book people are supposed to want to buy now?

The 41-year-old Vance makes great hay out of his relative youth on Capitol Hill, right up to bragging as often as possible about his pregnant wife. But this opening to his book tour has reflected how out-of-touch Vance actually is, not just with young people, but with Americans generally. He’s a fuddy-duddy, and he only makes it worse his habit of making bad jokes and then reacting petulantly when people don’t laugh at them. As Donald Trump’s vice president, Vance enjoys the presumption that he’s a shoo-in to be the next Republican nominee for president. But he’s so bad at politics that it increasingly seems he will get trounced in the primary, even as his potential challengers are also sorely lacking in charisma.

The book tour for “Communion” is already showcasing Vance’s incompetence as a politician. He sat for a telephone interview with USA Today last week that was clearly meant to read as “heartfelt,” but only makes him sound like a phony. He tries to cast his days of “blindly chasing ambition” behind himself, insisting now that his conversion to Catholicism has changed him into a man who tries to “focus on the good.” He swears to USA Today that he tries to “make wise decisions and moral decisions.”

Sadly for Vance, that interview was overshadowed by a New York Times story revealing how devoted Vance was to minimizing the relationship Trump had with deceased sex predator Jeffrey Epstein. The story, written by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, relies heavily on sources — possibly Vance himself — who are doing their level best to make him seem like the adult in the room, as the White House top staff convenes to cover for a boss who is cagey about his reasons for wanting to bury documents collected by the FBI on Epstein, who called himself “Don’s best friend.”

But while Vance is portrayed as wanting to release the files, it’s not for noble reasons, but in hopes that the illusion of transparency would prevent people from asking further questions about Trump and Epstein’s long and deep friendship. Vance also floated the idea of letting Epstein’s former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, out of prison for a day to sit in an interview with Tucker Carlson, having set the expectation that she would say Trump did nothing wrong. The fact that she would be contradicting credible sources, including another ex-girlfriend of Epstein’s who says Trump assaulted her, didn’t matter to Vance.



On  THE TIMES article that put Epstein back into the news cycler, Maureen Dowd notes it in her latest column:


In an article in The Times based on reporting for their upcoming book, “Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump,” Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan conjured a story that sounds like a farcical fable. It limns a group of stupid, craven, power-hungry people who inflame a panic about pedophilia among the elites, propelling Trump forward, before it all goes sideways and comes back to bite them.

Many in the White House, including the president and Pam Bondi, “had either grossly underestimat The authors reveal the stunning scene where Trump advisers met clandestinely one July day last year to figure out how to get control over the Epstein story.

JD Vance, Susie Wiles, Todd Blanche, Steven Cheung, Karoline Leavitt and others gathered, blasphemously, in the Situation Room — a place designed to steer combat operations, not political rescue missions. Bondi and Kash Patel joined via speaker phone.

Talk about a situation! The vice president was panicky, the authors wrote. He seemed to subscribe to “the darkest theories about Epstein and a cabal of predators hidden within the country’s ruling class.” He had been pushing for the release of all the files.

“Vance had also floated to colleagues an extraordinary P.R. gambit — that the White House enlist Tucker Carlson to interview Epstein’s longtime girlfriend and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell in prison,” Haberman and Swan wrote. “It might help the president if Maxwell was willing to state that Trump had not been part of any wrongdoing with Epstein.”

Even as Trump used the government to exact petty revenge, Epstein was posthumously getting revenge on Trump for trying to shake him off and claim they weren’t that close and that he was “not a fan.”

“Behind the scenes,” Haberman and Swan wrote, “the Epstein crisis was paralyzing the Trump administration to a far greater extent than the public knew.” (After their article ran, 19 Epstein survivors came out against Blanche’s nomination to be attorney general over his participation in the secret meeting.)

In the Situation Room, someone mentioned an uncorroborated accusation about Trump and a girl in Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring named Jen, who told another victim that she had sex with Trump and that he had a predilection for nipples, aggressively sucking and flicking hers. (This was surprising since Trump’s previous comments had him focused on grabbing another part of women’s anatomy.)


Epstein -- and Chump's long connection to him -- is not going away.   

The calls for people to appear before the Committee only increases.  Hugo C. Chiasson and Elise A. Spenner (HARVARD CRIMSON) report:


Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) called Wednesday for former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers to testify before the House Oversight Committee about his relationship with convicted child sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Garcia, the ranking Democrat on the panel, told MSNow after a lengthy session with Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates on Wednesday that he believed Summers was “someone that needs to be in front of the Oversight Committee and that we need to hear from directly.”

Summers faced public and professional backlash after a November release of documents revealed that he maintained an intimate, longstanding relationship with Epstein. Shortly after, the Department of Justice launched an investigation into Epstein’s relationship with Summers and other high-profile figures.

His name surfaced again during Gates’ Wednesday interview. Midway through Gates’ testimony, Garcia stepped out to tell reporters that Gates had cited Summers as someone involved in meetings or other activities with Epstein.

“Mr. Summers is someone that we as a committee have not had the chance to speak with, that we would like to speak with,” Garcia said at the time. “It seems that his name continues to come up.”

Summers declined to comment, through a spokesperson, on whether he had been formally asked to testify.



The House Oversight Committee formally requested Friday that Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz testify about his ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein, marking the latest step in the panel’s widening investigation into Epstein and his associates.

In a letter to Dershowitz, Rep. James R. Comer (R-Ky.), who chairs the committee, asked him to appear on July 9 for an in-person, videotaped transcribed interview in Washington, D.C.

The committee wrote that it believes Dershowitz has information that would assist its investigation because of his role as Epstein’s attorney, public reporting, documents released by the Department of Justice, and records obtained by the committee.


Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan (NEW YORK TIMES) Wednesday report on the Situation Room meetings of Todd Blanche, Pam Bondi, Susie Wiles, JD Vance and other members of the administration to plot on how to deceive the American people about Epstein and specifically Chump's closeness to Epstein continues to garner attention.  Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen (AXIOS) report:


Top White House officials believe New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan obtained audio recordings of Situation Room meetings for their forthcoming book, "Regime Change."

Why it matters: Such a taped leak would be a shocking breach of one of the most secure settings on Earth. Independent recording devices in the Situation Room are forbidden.

  • "We're afraid some of our most sensitive conversations were being recorded," an administration source told us. "And we have no idea which ones."

Verbatim accounts of several Situation Room meetings were included in excerpts about the Iran war and the Epstein files that The Times posted ahead of the book's June 23 publication. The authors conducted more than 1,000 interviews for "Regime Change," which covers Trump's second term.

  • Tellingly, White House officials haven't disputed verbatim dialogue from the top-secret Sit Room talks, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying about Bibi's regime-change scenarios for Iran: "In other words, it's bullshit."

If Chump's 'big' birthday felt hollow to you, apparently it did to Chump as well.  This morning, Tommy Christopher (MEDIAITE) reports:

President Donald Trump blurted a dead-of-night attack on “The Dumocrats” just hours after his Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) birthday bash on the White House lawn.

After being delayed by some nasty weather, the Trump-backed “Freedom 250” organization’s UFC fight at the White House to celebrate Flag Day/Trump’s birthday finally got underway.

The event lasted until well after 1 a.m., with Trump taking to the stage to congratulate the winner of the final bout, Justin Gaethje, at 1:15 after he defeated Ilia Topuria in the final event to take the UFC lightweight title

But Trump was still up at 4 a.m., posting on Truth Social — but not about the fight, his birthday, or the Bicentennnial-plus-50.



Mad ravings from the mind of a lunatic.  


Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:


Adani hired President Trump’s personal lawyer and reportedly offered to invest $10 billion in the United States to persuade the DOJ to drop its case

“DOJ’s actions doubly undermine global efforts to combat bribery: they appear to reduce accountability for the crime of bribery while also suggesting that quid-pro-quos can successfully undermine the enforcement of our laws.”

Text of Letter (PDF)

Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) pressed Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche for answers following the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to drop its criminal case against billionaire Gautam Adani after he hired President Trump’s personal lawyer and reportedly offered a quid-pro-quo deal to invest $10 billion in the United States in return.

“Mr. Adani appeared to engage in transparent influence-peddling to avoid accountability,” wrote the senators.

In its 2024 indictment, the DOJ alleged that Adani knowingly participated in a scheme to bribe Indian government officials and mislead investors to secure billions of dollars in investments—including at least $175 million from U.S. investors, per the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Adani hired a new legal team led by Robert J. Giuffra Jr., one of President Trump’s personal attorneys. In April, Mr. Giuffra reportedly met with prosecutors at DOJ headquarters to try and convince them to drop the charges. As part of his pitch to prosecutors, Mr. Giuffra reportedly included a highly unusual offer that the tycoon would invest $10 billion in the U.S. economy if prosecutors dropped the charges against him. While prosecutors reportedly “told Mr. Giuffra that the $10 billion investment would play no role in the resolution of the criminal case,” the offer reportedly “received a favorable response from at least one senior Justice Department official at the meeting.”

The DOJ then sought to dismiss the charges against him without any substantive rationale beyond the decision to not “devote further resources” to the case. This dismissal would prevent the DOJ from bringing the same charges against him again in the future.

“The DOJ’s decision gives the appearance that Mr. Adani – with the help of one of the President’s personal lawyers – bought his way to criminal immunity, trading the promise of an investment in the United States for immunity from an alleged multi-billion dollar bribery scheme,” wrote Senator Warren.

Within weeks of the DOJ's move to drop criminal charges, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sought to settle its parallel civil case against Adani for $6 million without an admission of wrongdoing, while the Treasury Department settled allegations of sanction violation with an Adani subsidiary.

The senators note that the DOJ's abandonment of the Adani case fits a pattern of favorable treatment for Trump’s allies, pointing to pardons granted to major Trump donors and the DOJ’s decision to decline to prosecute over 6,000 white-collar crime cases in the first six months of this administration, a 59% increase from the last three administrations.

“This refusal to prosecute those accused of white-collar crimes allows guilty parties to get off scot-free, keeping their ill-gotten wealth earned by cheating hard-working Americans,” wrote the senators.

“The reports of Mr. Adani’s offer to the DOJ last month appear to represent an egregious quid-pro-quo offer and a blatant attempt by a wealthy individual to buy his way to leniency – and the DOJ’s decision to seek to drop all criminal charges against him weeks later gives the appearance that the DOJ is an equal partner in corrupt behavior,” concluded the senators.

Senators Warren and Blumenthal asked the DOJ to explain how the DOJ came to the decision to seek to drop the charges against Adani; if Adani, or his representatives, made an offer, implicitly or explicitly, to invest $10 billion in the United States if the DOJ dropped its prosecution of him; and if anyone from the White House communicated with the DOJ regarding Adani’s case by June 25, 2026.

Senator Warren has led the fight to root out corruption and hold the Trump administration accountable:

  • In June 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), along with Representatives Jason Crow (D-Colo.) and Mike Levin (D-Calif.), pressed White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles following reports that the White House interfered to deliver a lucrative Department of Defense (DoD) contract to Vulcan Elements, a key Trump Jr.-linked company.
  • In May 2026, Senator Elizabeth Warren pressed the Acting Director-Designate for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), David Venturella, on his decades-long revolving door career between ICE and the private prison industry and his reported use of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) personnel and resources for personal or political favors.
  • In May 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) introduced the Banning Lobbying And Safeguarding Trust (BLAST) Act, a bipartisan bill to impose a lifetime ban on lobbying by former members of Congress.
  • In February 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Andy Kim (D-N.J.), along with Representatives Pat Ryan (D-N.Y.) and Deborah Ross (D-N.C.) pressed the Inspectors General (IGs) of 16 key agencies to open investigations into senior Trump officials who were recently lobbyists or “shadow lobbyists” and may be using their roles to benefit their former employers and clients.
  • In January 2026, Senators Warren (D-Mass.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Andy Kim (D-N.J.), pressed Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on potential conflicts of interest surrounding the awarding of multiple lucrative Department of Defense (DoD) contracts and loans to companies associated with President Donald Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr.
  • In December 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Representative Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) pressed the Trump administration to follow through on promises to limit defense companies' stock buybacks and incentivize them to increase research and development spending.
  • In December 2025, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) called for then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to recuse herself from the Department of Justice (DOJ)’s review of any Warner Bros. merger due to potential conflicts of interest related to her former employer, lobbying firm Ballard Partners.
  • In September 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, wrote to Donald Korb, nominee for Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), ahead of Korb’s confirmation hearing, pressing him on his stark conflicts of interest and urging him to make ethics commitments to mitigate these conflicts.
  • In July 2025, Senators Warren (D-Mass.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) wrote to former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin seeking an explanation and further information on his recent decision to start a strategic advisory firm. Austin had publicly promised Senator Warren during his 2021 confirmation process that he would not become a lobbyist after his government service ended.
  • In July 2023, United States Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Personnel, and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), and United States Representatives Jason Crow (D-Colo.) and Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.) introduced the Retired Officers Conflict of Interest Act – a bill that would require public reporting on retired service members working on behalf of foreign governments and creating civil penalties if they break the law.
  • In December 2020, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) and Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) reintroduced the Anti-Corruption & Public Integrity Act to strengthen ethics laws and crack down on government officials’ conflicts of interest across the government.

###




The following sites updated:






Saturday, June 13, 2026

Carly Simon to release a new album August 14th


Carly Simon howls like the wind on "Howl," the lead single to her upcoming album, Comes in Waves. The song's lyrics are a letter to a friend whose lover has just left them. With a big, catchy chorus, Simon advises the friend to get it out of their system: "Howl like the wind/Roar like the river/Wail like the rain/Cry, shout, and shiver," all leading to the ultimate catharsis, "Call love a liar." The song is gentle and powerful, and it portends more good songs for the rest of the album, which will be Simon's first in nearly two decades when it comes out on Aug. 14.
"‘Howl' lives in that space between betrayal and forgiveness, where anger has to be voiced before it can be released," Simon said in a statement. "It's about letting the frustration out, so it doesn't sit and simmer. The song begins in anger, but it moves toward forgiveness and speaks to any situation where trust has been broken."
Simon, who was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in 2022, wrote and recorded "Howl" and the rest of Comes in Waves at her studio in Martha's Vineyard. The record contains nine new original songs and a couple of songs the artist, 82, wrote earlier in her life and decided to revisit. She plucked the album title from "Slowly," another song on the album about resetting oneself, which her label says is the theme that runs through the record. The musicians on the album include John Forté (the Refugee Camp All-Stars member who died in January) and Simon's children, son Ben Taylor and daughter Sally Taylor; Sally created the album art.


Huge news.  I cannot wait for it to be released.  


 

Ilana Kaplan (PEOPLE) adds:


Simon also teamed up with legendary producer Paul Samwell-Smith to revisit and rework "Share The End," a song he originally produced for Simon's landmark 1971 album Anticipation and to help oversee the LP. She also worked with longtime collaborator, producer and engineer Frank Filipetti.

Per a press release, Simon's forthcoming album "does not attempt to recreate the past."

"Instead, it continues the conversation Simon has been having with her audience for decades, one grounded in truth, vulnerability, and a refusal to simplify emotion. It is a reminder of an artist still fully engaged with her craft, still asking questions, and still finding new ways to articulate what it means to live, to love, and to let go," it reads. 



This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot" for Friday:


Friday, June 12, 2026.  Chump tries to prevent his name from being taken off The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, THE NEW YORK TIMES' Wednesday report on the administration's meetings to launch a cover up of the Epstein crimes continues to garner attention, Ghislaine Maxwell creates a crisis at her prison when her sweater goes missing, and much more. 

Gregory Bovino, newly weaned from Chump's breasts, wants to be president in 2028 and is willing to tell any lies to get elected.  But his campaign suffered a hit and it's only come out this week.  Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) reports:


Former Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino's nascent 2028 presidential campaign suffered a blow when Jacob Engels, a controversial figure tasked with launching the candidate's online presence, was arrested at a budget motel and charged with felony methamphetamine possession.
According to reporting from The Bulwark's Will Sommers, Engels — a former protégé of Roger Stone and associate of far-right activist Laura Loomer — had taken the lead in promoting Bovino's candidacy before his arrest in River Falls, Wisconsin, on May 20.
Bovino, the polarizing face of the Trump administration's aggressive immigration enforcement operations, had pitched himself as a presidential candidate on X, writing: "If running for President is what it takes to actually get it done, then all options are on the table."


Though Bovino is lost to Chump now, Chump will apparently always have Speaker of the Closet Mike Johnson to defend him.  Sarah Ewall-Wice (DAILY BEAST) notes:


House Speaker Mike Johnson fumed after Republicans failed to approve a short-term extension of a key spy authority provision, known as FISA, in a blow to President Trump.

The president posted on Truth Social on Wednesday, calling the extension “very important to our Military, and keeping the American People safe,“ but the vote failed dramatically on Thursday.
The bill did not even get a simple majority, let alone the necessary two-thirds majority, failing 198 to 218. 19 Republicans joined 199 Democrats to vote against the bill. Only seven Democrats voted for it. 15 members did not vote.

Democrats in both the House and Senate have balked at the president’s naming Bill Pulte, who has zero national security or intelligence experience, as his acting Director of National Intelligence, upending talks on a bipartisan Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) extension.
Johnson fumed to reporters after the attempt to pass the extension failed in epic fashion in the House.


He's a lame duck -- one (as Elaine noted last night) out of his first 100 days.  Chump's going to have to learn to work with Congress if he wants to get anything done from now on.  Stop attacking them.  Stop insulting them.  Start listening to them.  But he's not able to listen.






No, I don't see much of a chance of that happening.  I just see him continue to bully and bluster and throw his tantrums. 


He threw one yesterday.  Over The Kennedy Center.  Julia Jacobs (NEW YORK TIMES) reports:

Lawyers for President Trump and the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on Thursday filed an appeal of an order to remove the president’s name from the institution.

The notice of appeal was filed as a legal deadline loomed for taking Mr. Trump’s name off the building’s marble facade. It also challenged a federal judge’s decision to temporarily block the president’s plan to close the center for two years of renovations.

Earlier on Thursday, the center’s board, which is composed almost entirely of Mr. Trump’s allies, voted to appeal the ruling, according to two people with direct knowledge of the meeting.

Finding that the board did not have the power to unilaterally change the name of the arts center, Judge Christopher R. Cooper of Federal District Court in Washington had ruled that Mr. Trump’s name must be taken down by Friday.


















The ranking Democratic member of the House Oversight Committee is calling for Vice President JD Vance to testify under oath about his involvement in the White House’s Jeffrey Epstein cover-up.

Appearing on MS NOW with host Ana Cabrera, a fuming Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) cited an explosive report in the New York Times on Wednesday that Vance headed meetings held in the White House Situation Room to deal with fallout from the Epstein files. According to Garcia, Vance, along with White House chief of staff Susie Wiles — who has also been in attendance at the secretive meetings — both need to be hauled before the committee headed by Rep. James Comer (R-KY).
“Well, look, obviously, [acting AG] Todd Blanche is near the top of the list [for testimony],” Garcia told Cabrera. “But there has been now new bombshell reporting where we have learned, as you know, that JD Vance, the vice president, has been holding meetings in the Situation Room, which is used for national security purpose just to discuss Epstein and looking at ways to exonerate President Donald Trump, coming up with a strategy on how they're going to use Ghislaine Maxwell to clear Trump's name.”

“And the vice president, for the very first time, is now implicated in part of this cover-up,” he accused. “He's meeting with Susie Wiles, he's meeting with [FBI Director] Kash Patel, he's meeting with Todd Blanche, he's meeting with [former Attorney General] Pam Bondi. And so it is now important that we, at some point, this committee has to talk to the vice president. We have to talk to Susie Wiles.”



Garcia added of former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who recently spoke with the Committee behind closed doors, “She said she wasn’t involved, she didn’t know what was going on. That’s also clearly not true. She was involved in some of these meetings, sometimes by telephone and is also a central figure in this reporting.”


THE NEW YORK TIMES revealed a cover up.  The top of the federal government conspiring to kill the story because Chump didn't like it.  Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) notes MS NOW's Sam Stein speaking on MORNING JOE: 

But really, I think the most interesting and most troubling element of this, well, there's a lot of troubling elements of this, is Todd Blanche. Todd Blanche, at the time, is the deputy AG, okay? He is ostensibly part of the Justice Department and therefore should have some sort of separation from the White House. And yet he's sitting in the Situation Room throughout this, plotting ways to shield the president of the United States from public scrutiny and legal scrutiny.


US House Rep Melanie Stansbury posted to THREADS:  "This is Trump’s Watergate. Today, the @nytimes released a truly stunning report on the Epstein cover-up by the White House. Collusion, breaking the law, evading subpoenas—it’s all in there." Ruth has noted:

Why was the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, and the FBI Director in meetings conspiring on how to avoid releasing material that would incriminate the president?  His attorney?  Fine.  But it is not the Attorney General's job to protect the image of the president.  This was an attempted cover up.  And it is one that continues because acting Attorney General Blanche refuses to release the rest of The Epstein Files despite being ordered to do so by a law that Congress passed and that Mr. Chump signed.  

We are in Watergate territory right now.  The cover up is always worse than the original crime.


People are outraged learning what was happening in the Situation Room, where Blanche and others met and conspired to deceive the American people -- to lie to them, to trick them.  All to protect Chump.  Laura Esposito (DAILY BEAST) notes


“All of this effort to protect Trump... Because he’s guilty. He did it. Over and over again. With Epstein. It’s a conspiracy to cover up Trump’s sexual assault crimes against minor girls,” political commentator Tom Joseph wrote on X on Wednesday.
Bill Kristol, director of Defending Democracy, also weighed in, taking specific aim at Blanche, the president’s former personal attorney whom Trump recently promoted to attorney general.

“One point very much worth noting: Todd Blanche was a central participant in the Epstein coverup,” Kristol wrote on X, alongside a link to the Times story. “As Deputy Attorney general, he was acting in Trump’s interest--not in the interest of the survivors, not in the interest of the law or of the truth.”
Behind closed doors, the Epstein crisis—which ultimately led many MAGA devotees to turn on the administration—had left Trump’s inner circle in full-blown panic mode, according to the report, an excerpt from Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan’s forthcoming book Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump.
The excerpt also detailed infighting among former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, Bondi, Patel, and Wiles as the administration struggled to contain a frustrated Trump, whom Epstein once described as his “closest friend.”

“Try as they might, Republicans will not succeed at sweeping this scandal under the rug,” Occupy Democrats wrote on X in response to the report. “The Epstein child-trafficking operation is the defining element of Trump’s life. He can delay and obfuscate, but eventually Democrats will retake power and the floodgates will be opened wide.”



A group of Jeffrey Epstein survivors came out in opposition to Todd Blanche’s nomination as President Donald Trump’s permanent attorney general, citing his participation in secret White House meetings on how to contain the political fallout from the Epstein files.

In a new statement obtained by CNN, 19 women responded to The New York Times’s reporting that Blanche and other senior officials participated in Situation Room meetings to discuss how to respond to growing pressure for more transparency as the issue became a public relations crisis for the administration.
“We are deeply disturbed to learn that so many senior members of the administration gathered in the Situation Room to discuss the release of the Epstein files as a reputational problem, rather than an opportunity to pursue investigative leads and try to figure out what actually happened,” the survivors of Epstein’s abuse said in the joint statement. “These revelations confirm our worst fears about the administration prioritizing political expediency over justice for survivors and truth for the American people.”

The survivors raised specific concerns about Blanche, who played a key role in overseeing the release of the Epstein files after Congress passed a law mandating it, who has now been nominated by President Donald Trump to permanently serve as the nation’s top law enforcement officer.

“We are especially concerned that Todd Blanche, the person nominated for the highest law enforcement position in the country, was at that table. Blanche has consistently minimized legitimate concerns about how the files have been handled, including problematic redactions and the exposure of survivors’ personal information. Blanche failed to deliver transparency, and he has gravely failed survivors. This is failing upward, plain and simple,” they wrote.
“We deserve better. We deserve truth, transparency, and accountability. We deserve to be taken seriously when we come forward. And we deserve an attorney general who will use the full power of that office to pursue justice, protect others, and ensure that what happened to us never happens again,” the women continued.


And the survivors do deserve better.  Blanche has gone before Congress and repeatedly lied  He's never told Congress that, as Deputy Attorney General he participated in plotting a cover up.  He's pretended to care about the survivors but he doesn't care bout them.  He's not bringing them up in the cover up meetings, he's not noting how they were harmed.  He's just plotting for ways to trick the public and to kill the Epstein story.  


Democrats on the House Oversight Committee issued the following yesterday:


WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, demanded Chairman James Comer immediately arrange interviews of Vice President JD Vance, acting-Attorney General Todd Blanche, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel, Donald Trump’s Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and other senior Trump Administration officials following explosive new reporting from The New York Times revealing secret Situation Room meetings to orchestrate the White House’s cover-up of the Epstein files in order to protect President Trump. Vance reportedly presided over a meeting in the Situation Room to coordinate the handling of the Epstein files.

“We have been fighting the White House cover-up for months—and now we know Vice President Vance is leading Epstein meetings from the Situation Room. Vance gathered Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche, Kash Patel, Susie Wiles, and the rest of Trump’s inner circle to figure out how to kill the Epstein story to protect the President, even debating a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell. Chairman Comer needs to bring the Vice President and the other top Administration officials before our Committee immediately,” said Ranking Member Robert Garcia.

In the letter to Chairman Comer, Ranking Member Garcia requested to bring the following Administration officials before the Committee:

  • J.D. Vance, Vice President of the United States;

  • Susie Wiles, White House Chief of Staff;

  • Tyler Budowich, White House Deputy Chief of Staff;

  • James Blair, White House Deputy Chief of Staff;

  • Karoline Leavitt, Press Secretary;

  • Steven Cheung, Communications Director;

  • Kash Patel, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);

  • Dan Bongino, former Deputy Director of the FBI; and

  • Stanley Woodward, Jr., Associate Attorney General

According to reports, Vice President Vance presided over a meeting in the Situation Room about how to manage and kill the Epstein story, joined by Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, then-Attorney General Pam Bondi, then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, FBI Director Kash Patel, and other senior officials.

###




Anna Skinner (NEWSWEEK) notes of the NYT report five items that stand out to her (we're excerting three):

3. Officials allegedly discussed transparency moves they knew wouldn’t produce new files
One reported strategy involved petitioning courts to unseal grand jury records, even though officials acknowledged the request was unlikely to succeed and the materials would likely remain sealed. Even if unsealed, officials believed the records would offer little in the way of meaningful new information.

Why it matters: Critics will argue this suggests some officials were focused more on managing public anger than uncovering new information.

4. The White House was terrified of losing the MAGA base—not Democrats
The crisis emerged after DOJ and FBI findings undercut years of expectations about a secret Epstein “client list.” According to the Times report, the administration’s biggest fear was backlash from its own supporters and influencers, not Democrats.

Why it matters: Modern Trump-era scandals usually involve attacks from opponents. This was a rare case where pressure came from inside Trump’s coalition.

5. Officials reportedly considered using Ghislaine Maxwell as a way to defend Trump
Among the most eyebrow-raising accounts in the report is one detailing officials’ discussions of having imprisoned Epstein associate Maxwell interviewed in a manner that could help rebut allegations involving Trump.

Why it matters: Maxwell is one of the most infamous figures connected to the Epstein case, and the idea that her testimony might be used in political damage control would inevitably attract scrutiny.


No one brought up -- in the cover up sessions -- the women Maxwell harmed or the crime she committed when it was wondered if a pardon could be granted to her.  No, the only thing the elves wanted to talk about was how Chump might face backlash for pardoning Maxwell.


She's in the news, by the way.  Kelly Coffey-Behrens (THE BLAST) reports:


Ghislaine Maxwell is reportedly at the center of another eyebrow-raising prison controversy, and this time, it allegedly brought daily life inside her Texas federal prison camp to a halt. According to a new report, Jeffrey Epstein’s former associate unintentionally triggered hours of lockdown chaos at the Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas, after reporting a personal item missing. The bizarre incident has only fueled new accusations that Ghislaine Maxwell is receiving preferential treatment behind bars.

Sources told the Daily Mail that the minimum-security prison camp was placed on lockdown in February after Maxwell alerted authorities that one of her belongings had disappeared. Hundreds of inmates were reportedly sent back to their dorms and kept there for several hours while prison staff searched the compound.
The situation allegedly began after Maxwell reported a zip-up fleece she purchased through the prison commissary had gone missing, claiming her ID badge and important papers were inside the pockets. However, the lockdown reportedly ended after another inmate came forward and explained there had been a misunderstanding.

“Max was saying she had her ID badge and important papers in the pockets. But nobody had stolen anything. This lady had picked it up to give it back to her,” a source claimed.

Despite the explanation, inmates reportedly remained confined for hours. “It was all an innocent mistake, but they still kept everyone locked down for four or five hours for their investigation,” the source added. “They do this a couple of times a month for a fight, a medical emergency, or a random count – but never for a lost sweater.”



Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) told CNN's Kaitlan Collins that President Donald Trump is a traitor for refusing to release the Epstein files to protect his associates.

Greene said Trump called her a traitor for urging transparency, but she countered, arguing those covering up the files — including the President — are the real traitors.
"He told me on the phone that his friends would get hurt, and that's why he's against releasing the Epstein files," explained Greene.

She criticized Trump for campaigning as a drain the swamp candidate while allegedly working to suppress documents.


Chump filed a lawsuit against THE WALL STREET JOURNAL last year when they reported on the birthday letter he wrote (and drew) to Jeffrey Epstein.  It is Chump's signature.  As he continues attempting to sue them, the paper has responded.  Thomas Kika notes:

The Wall Street Journal is arguing that one detail matches its reporting about President Donald Trump's connection to Jeffrey Epstein.

 
In a new legal filing, lawyers for Dow Jones, the company that owns the Wall Street Journal, argued that Trump "cannot" dispute that a signature appearing on a typewritten note and a sketch of a naked woman sent to Epstein resembles his own.
[. . .]

The defense lawyers are telling the court to throw out Trump's lawsuit because "the article is true." After the Journal reviewed the letter and sketch with Trump's signature, Epstein's estate released the "Birthday Book" to the House Oversight Committee in September.
"The article is true because the description of the letter 'bearing Trump's name' in the article is an entirely accurate description of the letter as it appears in the Birthday Book," the filing read.

"The article states that the Journal 'reviewed' the letter before publication and described its contents in detail (which exactly match the contents of the letter released by Congress)," the legal filing argued, adding that Trump doesn't even dispute the resemblance of his signature to the one in the birthday book "because he cannot."


Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:


Largest pharmacy benefit manager in the U.S. may be sending affiliated pharmacies inflated payments, elbowing out competitors 

“[T]axpayers deserve to know that (government funds) are being used for their intended purpose, not for potential self-dealing by DHA contractors.”

Text of Letter (PDF)

Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), wrote to Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Keith Bass, urging him to follow through on commitments he made to release data that would allow Congress to evaluate whether Express Scripts, the largest pharmacy benefit manager in the United States and military pharmacy contractor, may be sending inflated payments to its own pharmacies and under-reimbursing competing pharmacies.

“[T]axpayers deserve to know that [government funds] are being used for their intended purpose, not for potential self-dealing by [Defense Health Agency] contractors,” said Senator Warren.

The Defense Health Agency (DHA) spends billions of dollars to provide TRICARE pharmacy benefits — as part of the military health care system — to 9.6 million service members, retirees, and family members. Since 2009, DHA has awarded Express Scripts an exclusive TRICARE pharmacy contract, which involves running the military’s retail pharmacy network and mail order program.

But Express Scripts also owns mail order and specialty pharmacies that participate in the TRICARE network. Reporting has revealed that Express Scripts appears to be charging the military $484 more, on average, to dispense generic drugs through Express Scripts’ own mail-order pharmacies than through competing pharmacies.

“[This] creates a clear conflict of interest,” said Senator Warren. As a result of onerous contract terms offered by Express Scripts, more than 13,000 retail pharmacies have left the TRICARE network since 2022, leaving hundreds of thousands of military families without an in-network pharmacy.

In a recent hearing, Senator Warren pressed Assistant Secretary Bass to commit to conducting annual audits of TRICARE’s pharmacy contract and providing Congress with the difference in reimbursement rates, fees, and other price concessions for Express Scripts-owned pharmacies and their competitors in the network. Bass agreed, but with no particular timeline in place.

“You gave me your commitment that you would do so. I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and request that you provide my office with all relevant and pertinent data in accordance with these commitments by June 22, 2026,” concluded Senator Warren.

Senator Warren has led the fight for affordable health care and fair practices for military families:

  • In May 2026, at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) pushed DHA head Keith Bass to commit to an annual audit of Express Scripts’ contract and releasing both pharmacy reimbursement data and the results of audits to Congress. Bass agreed to do so following Senator Warren’s questioning.
  • In October 2025, at a hearing of the Senate Special Committee on Aging, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) asked Mark Cuban, founder of Cost Plus Drugs, and Dr. Jeanne Lambrew, Director of Health Care Reform and Senior Fellow at The Century Foundation, about the potential for greater transparency in the pharmaceutical industry to lower costs for taxpayers and military families. Cuban agreed with Senator Warren that requiring Express Scripts to report the difference in reimbursement rates between affiliated and unaffiliated pharmacies would save money and help smaller independent pharmacies stay in business.
  • In March 2025, at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) questioned Lieutenant General Dr. Douglas J. Robb of the U.S. Air Force about price gouging in the military’s prescription drug system. Lieutenant General Robb agreed that this taxpayer overcharging is “unfair” and said that Express Scripts needs to “follow what is the business policy and what is the contractual law.”
  • In June 2024, Senators Warren (D-Mass.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), U.S. Representative Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), and 20 other lawmakers wrote to the then Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and Director of the Defense Health Agency, raising concerns over Express Scripts’ exclusive contract to administer TRICARE’s pharmacy program, the healthcare system for the military, retirees, and their families.
  • In August 2020, Senator Warren (D-Mass.) and then-Senator Bob Casey (D-Pa.) requested information from five of the largest mail-order pharmacies and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) about any delays or other problems with mail-order deliveries of medications as a result of operational changes at the United States Postal Services (USPS) by Postmaster General Louis DeJoy. Reports indicated that President Trump and Postmaster General DeJoy's sabotage of the USPS is resulting in significant delays for every type of mail - including life-sustaining prescription drugs for seniors, veterans, and millions of other patients.

###



And with this from THE BLACK COMMENTATOR:


BlackCommentator.com                    

           

June                     11, 2026 Issue 1089

         
           
              

The                       Black Commentator

             

 Issue                           #1089

             

             

 is                           now Online

              June 11, 2026
           

           
           

Read                         issue 1089

                       

Our email address                 is BlackCommentator@gmail.com

           

Our voicemail                 number is 856.823.1739




updated: